Immigration

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/10

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

11 Terms

1
New cards

(3) Principles of 1951 Refugee Convention, 1957 Protocol on Refugee Status

  1. Non-refoulement: cannot forcibly deport refugees when they face serious threat of persecution

  2. Non-discrimination

  3. Non-penalization: cannot criminalize refugees who do not fulfil entry procedures, etc.

2
New cards

Refugee vs Asylum:

  • Refugee: status given to you and recognized by state

  • Asylum seeker: status not yet recognized

3
New cards

What does the Spanish case tell us about the principle of non-refoulement?

The ECHR agrees with the deportation of those who do not fulfil entry requirements (thus non-penalization principle is not applied consistently

4
New cards

Jamaa v Italy

Italy forced return of asylum seekers in international waters

ECtHR Ruling: Italy is responsible for HR violations when intercepting vessels containing asylum seekers in international waters as they have effective control over persons

5
New cards

Zadvydas v Davis

  • Question: can US hold asylum seekers indefinitely?

  • US Supreme Court Ruling: administrative detention of asylum seekers: limit of 6 months. longer is unconstitutional (refering to 5th amendment: due process)

6
New cards

Hamdan v Rumsfield

  • Hamdan, worker for Osama bin Laden, taken to Guantánamo

  • to be tried by a military commission set up by Bush administration, not authorized by Congress

  • US Supreme Court Ruling: unlawful → separation of powers

  • Established that Guantanamo Bay “unlawful enemy combatants” are entitled to have detention reviewed (habeas corpus)

7
New cards

Hawaii v Trump

Hawaii v Trump

  • Hawaii sues Trump for immigration policies (banning certain nations)

  • Trump cites Korematsu precedent

  • US Supreme Court ruling:

    • Upholds Trump’s policies due to security concerns

    • Repudiates precedent

8
New cards

2 Camps on Immigration:

  1. Open Border Utopian Theorists

  2. Realists (Dystopian)

9
New cards
  1. Open Border Utopian Theorists 

  • Pro-Immigrants → diversity, economic mobility

  • Joseph Carens 

  • proof: US, Canada 

  • Uses John Rawls’ veil of ignorance → opt for max happiness for all, favour disadvantaged

    • according to veil, we must open up borders for immigration 

10
New cards
  1. Realists (Dystopian): 

  • Anti-Immigrants 

  • Samuel Huntington

  • Globalization causes contact between civilizations with different world views 

  • Migration leads to more clashes 

  • Recently gaining more traction

11
New cards

Critiques of Samuel Huntington’s Realist POV

Critics:

  • Non-constructive → theory can produce conflicts itself

Response:

  • Not sugarcoating