Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
Ceteris paribus
FOP
Land
Natural resources
Labor
all human effort
Capital
tangible facilities
Entrepreneurship
Risk taker, management
Manages the FOP
Command economies
Pros, cons of command economies
Market economies
pros, cons of market economies
Microeconomics
Subject that studies the behavior of individuals and firms in making decisions regarding the allocation of limited resources to satisfy unlimited wants and needs.
Economic vs free goods
Opportunity costs, and importance
the value of the next-best alternative when a decision is made
PPC Assumptions
1. Resources are fixed \n 2. All resources are fully employed \n 3. Only two things can be produced. (of similar production to be realistic) \n 4. Technology is fixed. \n 5. Unrealistic
PPC looka at capacity to produce not price
PPC
points on curve is potential output
Increasing cost PPC
Opportunity cost increases
PPC curve increases
increases in Q or Quality of FOP
Potential output increase
homo economics
'Economic man', economic decisions are always made rationally. Rational people maximize utility (being the most useful), for wealth and own interest.
Reallocation
Moving resources of one to another production
Redistribution
Changing the levels of output/income
Price mechanisms
Signilling
High price
signals to consumers to consumer less
To producers to produce more-higher profits
Rationing
More scarce
demand exceeds supply
Higher price, conserved
Incentive
Prices incentive certain behaviors
high wage = work
High price = join market, produce
PPC - effect of Capital goods (investment)
Marginal utility
Satisfaction or usefulness obtained from acquiring one more unit of a product. Utility is subjective (meaurement of satisfaction). Helps determines prices.
Efficiency
Output produced by fewest resources
Circular flow of income model
mixed economy more gov intervention
Planned economy, no private sector -gov controls resource and product sector
fractional reserve banking
a banking system that keeps only a fraction of funds on hand and lends out the remainder
Rational consumer choice assumptions
utility maximization, Perfect information (all info on choices),
Behavioral econ ctritizes this
Cognitive biases
systematic influences in thinking
Limits to rationality
Bounded rationality - Limits in ability to process all information, thus consumers seek a satisfactory outcome instead of the best
Bounded self-control: People are self contorled only within limits
Bounded selfishness: selfish within limits
Imperfect information
Nudges
when have limited finances do
Choice architecture
framing to influence choice
Illusion of free choice
Pros of behavioral econ
Create more socially responsible outcomes
Cons of behavioral econ
Like a gov regulation but disguised as choice
Unexpected outcomes Electricity neighbours comparison People who spent lower, will spend more
Not in individuals benefit
Growth maximiztion for firms why?
satisficing
A decision-making strategy where one chooses the first option that meets the minimum requirements, rather than seeking the optimal solution.
For firm: Instead of maximizing one objective achieve satisfactory result from multiple
Critiques of rational behavior
Dual proccess theories
Demand
Law of diminishing marginal utility
the principle that consumers experience diminishing additional satisfaction as they consume more of a good or service during a given period of time
Veblen goods
Shifts of demand
Income
Preference
Substitute goods
Complementary goods
Number of consumers
Supply
Shifts of supply
Costs of FOP
Quality/efficiency of FOP
Tech advancements
Price of goods
competing for same resources
Joint supply - products that result from use of other resources
Producer price expectations
Rising prices, may withhold supply from market
Number of firms
Government intervention
Subsidies
encourage production
Indirect taxation
decrease supply
Taxes paid of G&S
Allocative Efficiency
Consumer and producer surplus
When consumers pay price below willing and able to pay
When producers sell at price above willing and able
MSC,MB, MC
MSC: the cost that society pays as a result of the production of additional units or utilization of a good or service
Demand is MB because as each extra unit consumed, benefit decreases. So the curve shows how customers only willing to pay if price falls.
Supply is MC because extra unit produced, cost increases. So price must increase to cover the costs (curve shows price willing to accept to produce additional unit)
PED
elastic vs inelastic
More responsive to price changes
Less responsive
Elasticity along Demand curve
Higher price, more elastic
Lower price, less elastic - price so low no one cares
PED Determinents
Time period
More time = more elastic
Have more time to respond
SPLAT
sub
proportion
Luxury
Addiction
Time
YED
The eagle curve
YED on the economy/industries
YED on recessions
PES
PES and graph intersecitons
PES determinents
Length of time
more time higher PES
Mobility of FOP
Ease of shifting FOP
Spare/unused capacity of firms
More capacity higher PES
Ability to store stocks
Quicker to react
Rate of input cost increases
Higher rate - lower PES
Don’t want the costs, harder to get FOP
PES of primary vs manufactured and PES vs price flunctuations
Agri has unstable revs
so gov will support
Why govs intervene + Methods
Tax revenue
low ped good
Support for firms
Smaller firms to be able to compete with larger
Encourage the production of certain good
Protect domestic firms
tariffs, import quotas
Trade protection measures
Support low-income households
Meet basic needs
Decourage production of certain good
tax
Influence consumption levels
Demerit merit goods
With subsidies, direct provision of goods, nudges, taxes
Command and control methods
compulsary education
Correct market failure
Not allocative efficient
Promote equity
Fairness
Helps redistribute income
Price ceilings - consequences, how it looks
Lower P
Lower Qs
Lower Rev
Higher Qd
Disequilibrium
Shortage
Not enough resources allocated
Dealing/effects with/of shortages? - rations
Non-Price rationing
Divide up resources
no longer use price
Underground markets
Buying/selling that isn’t recorded
illegal
Those willing to pay more
Price ceiling welfare impacts
MB>MC
Consumers gaining more benefit than cost of society to produce
Consumers partially gain and lose
Those buying lower price win
Cannot then lose
Producers are worse off
How gov reduce shortage
Demand left
Reduce price for substitute goods, using subsidies
Or rationing good
Shift s curve right
Subsidies, less tax
Direct provision
Buffer stock
Calculating surplus, and loss of trapezium
Sum of Vertical parallel lines
Price floors
Why price floors
Protect resource markets
Protect product markets
Minimum wages
Price floors and surplus
Gov must buy off
Dispose surplus through
Exports
Storing
Or just pay them the money but don’t produce good
Consequneces of price floor
Firm inefficiency
No incentive to reduce costs
Overallocation
Welfare impacts
Consumers: a
Producers gain from S above to Qs, below Pf
F is not welfare loss bcs it’s gained through this
Gov must buy the excess supply from Qs to Qd rectangle
Welfare loss = rectangle-f
Other countries
Worse off for them bcs selling at lower price so may lower market price in world
Taxation
Increase prices
Why govs impose tax
Consequences of taxation
Underallocation'
Tax burden
shared by consumers and producers
Subsidies
Why subsidies
Impacts of susbidies
Producer surplus gained is bcs of the subsidy they get
Producer rev = Pp x Qsb
Consumer surplus gained bcs of lower price
Calculating
just add on the surplus
Producer: ((Pp - S1 int) x Qsb)/2
Consumer: ((D int-Pc) x qsb)/2
Foreign producers cannot compete with lower price
Command and control regulations - limitations
an approach to protecting the environment that sets strict legal limits and threatens punishment for violations of those limits
No incentive to improve quality beyond standard
Not applicable for all firms
smaller firms cannot handle
Large firms can lobby
Sacrifice quality/effectiveness
Not the most efficient in reducing environemental impacts
Taxes better
Comand and control pros
Used when strong compliance is needed
solutions to problems are well-known
Perfect comp Characteristics (HL)
Monopoly (HL)
Monopolistic competition (HL)
Oligopoly (HL)
homo or hetero
Competition and market power (HL)
Theory of firm (HL)
Firms acts in interest of maximizing profits
Calculating costs of firms (HL)
Perfect competition price and revenue graph (HL)
No influence on price
So must accept the market
Non-Perfect competitiion revenue graph (HL)
MR. DARP
explicit vs implicit costs (HL)
MC vs AC (HL)
Long run AC curve - short vs long (HL)
Long run = normal profit in PC and MPC
Economies of scale (HL)
the property whereby long-run average total cost falls as the quantity of output increases / FOP increases
Profit (HL)
Short run only can have abnormal profit in Mon Comp and Perfect comp
Profit max output (HL)
For non-perfect, need to go up to D
Normal profit meaning (HL)
Common pool resources
Sustainability
The use of resources in a way that does not result in fewer or lower quality of resources for future generations
Renewable vs non
Market failure
The failure to allocate resources efficiently
MPB and MPC meaning
Negative production externalities
Welfare loss in negative production externalities
Only need to know about the welfare loss
It is a loss of social benefits due to overproduction of the good caused by the externality.
Policies to correct negative production externalities (market-based)
indirect/piguevian taxes
Carbon taxes
Taxes on emissions
Firms are incentivized to switch to greener sources
Tradable permits
Permits to pollute issued to firms
over particular time period
Traded in market
Firms can sell the permits unused
Incentivizes to switch
MSC decrease
Pros and cons of market-based policies to correct NPE
Tradable permits
need to determine cap
cap too high, no effect
too low, hardships for firms
How to distribute fairly
Big firms won’t feel cost of permits
requires strong gov to uphold
Taxes
politically difficult
How will it affect consumers
low income cannot pay a higher price
Large firms can just pay tax
Identifying which pollutant is harmful and how to value the harm
Countries
Disadvantaging themselves against other countries
Output will decrease
If other country doesn’t use
Malaysian haze, indo
Gov regulation to correct NPE
Pros, Cons of gov reg on NPE
Collective self-governance
Education on NPE