1/118
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Bio - Hormones/Cognitive processes
Buchanan and Lovallo (2001)
Bio - Genetics
Caspi Et Al (2002)
Bio - Technology in research/Neurotransmission
Antonova Et Al (2011)
Antonova Et Al (2011): Aim
Test effect of Scopolamine (stress hormone) on Hippocampal activity in the creation of spatial memory
Antonova Et Al (2011): Method
20 male adults, double-blind procedure
Injected with Scopolamine or placebo and were put in fMRI while playing spatial memory testing VR game to navigate an arena to go to a pole, they did the opposite treatment 3-4 weeks later
Antonova Et Al (2011): Results
Scopolamine showed lowered Hippocampus activity
Antonova Et Al (2011): Conclusion
Acetylcholine plays a key role in the encoding of spatial memories in humans, as well as in rats.
Bio - Localization of brain function/Cog - Thinking and Decision Making
Bechara Et Al (1994)
Bechara Et Al (1994): Aim
Study of how much vmPFC damage affects decision-making
Bechara Et Al (1994): Method
Using groups with vmPFC damage and without, the 2 groups had to gamble money on 4 card decks (2 high-prize & risk, 2 low-prize & risk); the groups had to see which was more advantageous
Bechara Et Al (1994): Results
Non-damage group was more strategic and saw the pattern earlier; those with damage failed to see patterns and acted on impulse
Bechara Et Al (1994): Conclusion
Suggests vmPFC contributes to our ability to use system 2 processing; if damaged, you may not be able to think past impulses & consequences
Bio - Neuroplasticity
Draganski Et Al (2004)
Draganski Et Al (2004): Aim
To investigate whether structural changes in the brain would occur in response to practicing a simple juggling routine
Draganski Et Al (2004): Method
Experiment, mixed design, self-selected sample of volunteers with no prior experience of juggling
Draganski Et Al (2004): Results
- No difference in brain structure between both groups before the experiment
- After 3 months of practice, the jugglers had significantly more grey matter int he mid-temporal area of the cortex in both hemispheres. (these areas are known to be responsible for coordination of movement)
- After 6 months, (3 months of non-practice) the differences decreased. However, the jugglers still had more grey matter in these areas than at the first brain scan.
Draganski Et Al (2004): Conclusion
Grey matter grows in the brain in response to environmental demands (learning) and shrinks in the absence of stimulation (lack of practice); showing that there is cause-and-effect relationship between learning and brain structure.
Buchanan and Lovallo (2001): Aim
To explore the effects the release of cortisol (stress hormone) on memories of emotional information
Buchanan and Lovallo (2001): Method
Participants were first screened for psychiatric and neurological conditions and were given 20mg of cortisol or a placebo, shown a range of images, either pleasant (food) or unpleasant (weapons) scenes, participants were then asked to rank the images based on emotional arousal, and the participant's memory of the images were then tested again one week later
Buchanan and Lovallo (2001): Results
Both groups remembered the emotionally arousing images better that then neutral images
· Cortisol group remembered more emotionally arousing images than the control group.
· The strongest effect was found in cued memory - giving the participants a category title in order for them to recall images (i.e. food, sports etc)
Buchanan and Lovallo (2001): Conclusion
Study suggests that the amygdala's interaction with the hypothalamus causing the release of cortisol may result in consolidation of memory
Bio - Pheromones
Cornwell Et Al (2004)
Cornwell Et Al (2004): Aim
See if androstadienone would affect what types of faces females found attractive in men
Cornwell Et Al (2004): Methods
112 women at 12-26 years old in University of St. Andrews in Scotland were shown in a series of faces that ranged in masculinity, ranked faces based on attractiveness and desirability for short/long-term relationships; they also smelled vials that contained live different chemicals, one of these being androstadienone
Cornwell Et Al (2004): Results
There was a correlation (0.37) between females who showed a preference for masculine faces for a long-term relationship and a for a preference for the smell of androstadienone
Cornwell Et Al (2004): Conclusion
Androstadienone is a possible human pheromone and it might signal high quality genes
Cornwell Et Al (2004): Evaluation
Pros: Many participants, researcher triangulation
Cons: Not generalizable, not proven that human can smell pheromones
Caspi Et Al (2002): Aim
Ongoing study of 1037 children of Dunedin, NZ where they analyzed health, well-being, development, etc.
Caspi Et Al (2002): Method
Took every child in Dunedin, followed them for life and studied their genes, blood, successes, failures, etc.
Caspi Et Al (2002): Results
MAOA-L gene holders who were abused likely became antisocial adults; behavior is a product of how genes interact with the environment we live in
Caspi Et Al (2002): Conclusion
MAOA-L gene holders who were abused likely became antisocial adults, behavior is a product of how genes interact with the environment we live in
Bio - Genetic Similarities
Grove Et Al (1990)
Grove Et Al (1990): Aim
Investigate the extent to which anti-social behavior can be attribute to genetics
Grove Et Al (1990): Method
32 sets of identical twins went through interviews, tests, and questionnaires
Grove Et Al (1990): Results
28% of adults and 41% of children inherited anti-social behavior
Grove Et Al (1990): Conclusion
Though genes can influence anti-social behavior, environment is still an influence
Cog - Models of Memory
Peterson and Peterson (MSM), Robbins Et Al (WMM), Klingberg Et Al (WMM, HL)
Multi-Store Model of Memory
Atkinson and Shiffin's 1968 model to explain how memories are formed
Working Memory Model
The information we hold and manipulate in our conscious attention, developed by Baddeley and Hitch
Peterson & Peterson (1959): Aim
To determine the duration of short-term memory
Peterson & Peterson (1959): Method
Participants were given a random trigram to remember, asked to count backwards in 3s from a random number to stop them from rehearsing the information so it would stay in the STS, then they had to remember the trigram
Peterson & Peterson (1959): Results
After about 6 seconds, accuracy was at 50%, but dropped to almost 0% after 18 seconds
Peterson & Peterson (1959): Conclusion
This study supports the claim of the Multi-Store Model that STS has a duration of about 20 seconds
Robbins Et Al (1996): Aim
See if memory recall would be affected by processing different types of interfering information
Robbins Et Al (1996): Method
20 male chess players from Cambridge memorized chess piece spots for 20 seconds, then had to replicate the arrangement (Four Controls)
C1: Had to repeat "The" repeatedly (Phonological Loop)
C2: Press numbers on a keyboard (Visuospatial Sketchpad)
C3: Call a sequence at random with the beat (Central Executive)
C4: No added task (Control)
Robbins Et Al (1996): Results
- Phonological loop had little to no effect (16/25)
- Performed worse in VS and CE (4/25)
Robbins Et Al (1996): Conclusion
There are different slave systems that process different information in the STS
Klingberg Et Al (2005): Aim
Test the effects of computer game training on working memory and attention problems
Klingberg Et Al (2005): Method
42 ADHD kids assigned to either condition: Computer game for improving working memory that got harder (Treatment), same game but no difficulty (Control) for 40 mins a day for 5 days a week; They were tested after 5 weeks of treatment and again after three months
Klingberg Et Al (2005): Results
Results showed that the kids in the treatment group had a significant improvement in their working memory capacity; parents also reported reduced symptoms of inattention & hyperactivity
Klingberg Et Al (2005): Conclusion
This is one example of positive effects of technology on the reliability of cognitive processes, in this case working memory capacity and attention
Cog - Schema
Stone Et Al (2010), Bransford and Johnson (1974)
Stone Et Al (2010): Aim
Investigate effect of schema on sports & race on information comprehension
Stone Et Al (2010): Method
College-aged participants were asked to listen to a basketball game and make judgements; They then were given an image of the player they were listening about (One black, one white) to make judgements
Stone Et Al (2010): Results
Black: More athletic, played better
White: Better intelligence, played with hustle
Stone Et Al (2010): Conclusion
Schema theory shows that activating a particular social schema can influence processing of new information; Stereotypes lead to confirmation bias, further reinforcing the stereotype and may affect behaviors
Bransford & Johnson (1974): Aim
Lab experiment, investigate how schemas help us to store new info in our memory
Bransford & Johnson (1974): Method
Participants are grouped into 3 grand are read a paragraph describing a # of steps to a procedure.
G1 is told the paragraph is about laundry prior to reading.
G2 is told the paragraph is about laundry after reading.
G3 is not told anything.
All are told to recall as many details as possible.
Bransford & Johnson (1974): Results
G1 had the best memory
Bransford & Johnson (1974): Conclusion
Schemas help encode new information to organize and interpret, memory involves actively interpreting what you hear based on existing knowledge
Bransford & Johnson (1974): Ethics
The study is easy to replicate with high reliability, making it well-controlled, but as individual schemas affect how one views surroundings, the paragraph is deliberately ambiguous and has a low sample and generalizability
Cog - Thinking and Decision Making/Cognitive Bias
Strack and Mussweiler (1997)
Strack and Mussweiler (1997): Aim
To test the influence of anchoring bias on decision making
Strack and Mussweiler (1997): Method
60 male and female German university students, half were asked if Gandhi was older or younger than 9 years old when he died, the other half were asked if he was older or younger than 140 years old; Then, they were asked how old they think he was when he died
Strack and Mussweiler (1997): Results
Participants in the high anchor condition had the average guess of 67 years old, lower anchor had 50 years old
Strack and Mussweiler (1997): Conclusion
Study demonstrates the anchoring effect, numerical information given to participants before making a judgement can include cue their later judgements, it also shows it can hav an effect even if the numbers are implausible
Cog - Reconstructive Memory
Loftus and Palmer (1995), Sparrow Et Al (2011)
Loftus & Palmer (1995): Aim
See if false memories of autobiographical events could be made through power of suggestion
Loftus & Palmer (1995): Method
Subjects' relatives were asked to recount 3 childhood memories, including if they've been lost in a mall; Subjects got a questionnaire in the mail asking about 4 memories and write on it as much as possible, and were interviewed 2x in 4 weeks and rated their confidence of their memory from 1-10
Loftus & Palmer (1995): Results
25% participants 'recalled' the false memory as true, but less confident
Loftus & Palmer (1995): Conclusion
This suggests strong evidence for the role of power of suggestion in making false memories
Sparrow Et Al (2011): Aim
See if the use of external storage systems has a negative impact on memory
Sparrow Et Al (2011): Method
Participants were asked to remember 40 trivia items, half were told it would be saved, half were told to remember, half were not told about memory test
Sparrow Et Al (2011): Results
No effect of being told to remember/not, significant effect in saved vs erased conditions, if people thought they could look it up later, they had a worse memory
Sparrow Et Al (2011): Conclusion
The expectation of access to information, such as is experienced with having continual access to internet search engines, has a negative effect on recall; There is no need to encode the information if it possible to just look it up later
Cog - Cognitive Bias
Stone Et Al (2010), Cohen Et Al (1981)
Cohen Et Al (1981): Aim
Lab experiment, seeing how activating stereotypes influences memory
Cohen Et Al (1981): Method
Researchers made videos with actors having dinner for the woman's birthday. Half were told she was a waitress, half were told she was a librarian. The woman had equal amounts recorded what participants recalled
Cohen Et Al (1981): Results
Those who had waitress remembered beer, music, guitar; those who had librarian remembered salad, art, piano
Cohen Et Al (1981): Conclusion
If we have a "Schema activated", we process new info as it relates to existing schema as it's easier to remember
Cohen Et Al (1981): Ethics
Controlled as it takes place in a lab, but lacks ecological validity with the artificial environment; Good generalizability as it's not limited to a group and has a simple method
Cog - Influence of Emotion on other Cognitive processes
Buchanan and Lovallo, Brown and Kulik
Brown and Kulik (1977): Aim
To investigate the determinants of flashbulb memories about assassinations, highly newsworthy events, and personally significant events
Brown and Kulik (1977): Method
A questionnaire was administered to 80 participants (40 African Americans and 40 Caucasian Americans)
Asked recall circumstances where they'd learned of shocking events, 9 based on assassinations or attempts on well-known personalities and the 10th on a self-selected event of personal relevance involving unexpected shock
Brown and Kulik (1977): Results
The researchers found that 90% of the participants recalled a significant amount of detail about the day when these events occurred; 75% of black participants had flashbulb memories of the murder of Martin Luther King, compared to 33% of white participants.
Brown and Kulik (1977): Conclusion
Concluded that FBM is more likely for unexpected, personally relevant events, possibly caused by physiological emotional arousal
Socio - Social Identity Theory/Stereotypes
Park and Rothbart (1982), Stone Et Al (2010)
Park & Rothbart (1982): Aim
Investigate in-group favoritism and out-group homogeneity effects
Park & Rothbart (1982): Method
Members of 3 sororities were asked how they viewed their sorority (and others) on 10 factors on a 9-Point scale (higher #, more sorority thinks they're similar...)
Park & Rothbart (1982): Results
Members ranked their own sorority favorably, others as more homogenic
Park & Rothbart (1982): Conclusion
Being part of a group makes individuals want to boost self-esteem and think their group favorably
Park & Rothbart (1982): Ethics
Low generalizability, field study, not controlled
Socio - Social Cognitive Theory
Bandura Et Al (1961)
Bandura Et Al (1961): Aim
To investigate if aggression is learned through observation and imitation
Bandura Et Al (1961): Method
72 kids in 3 groups (12 boys, 12 girls), model showed (non) agressionn for 10 mins.
G1: Watched either a female/male model behave aggressively to a 'Bobo Doll'
G2: Children watched non-aggressive models who quietly played with a toy set and ignored the Bobo Doll
G3: Control, not exposed to any model
The children were then placed in a room containing (non) aggressive toys for 20 minutes and observed
Bandura Et Al (1961): Results
G1 more agressive (especially if male model), boys were more agressive, girls more verbal
Bandura Et Al (1961): Conclusion
Agression and socila behavior can be learnt by observation, sex roles influence limited behaviors
Socio - Culture/Cultural Dimension
Levine Et Al (1994)
Levine Et Al (1994): Aim
See how helpful people from different cultures/populations are in non-emergency solutions
Levine Et Al (1994): Method
36 U.S. cities measured correlations between population density and behavior, in a field, researchers pretended to drop a pen, postcard, or crossing the street