Public Goods, Voting Theorems, and Decision-Making in Economics

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/33

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

These flashcards cover key concepts related to public goods, voting theory, decision-making, and risk in economics.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

34 Terms

1
New cards

Vertical Summation

For public goods, adds the worth of one unit to find the aggregate demand curve.

2
New cards

Horizontal Summation

For private goods, adds the quantity desired for a set price of a good to get the aggregate demand curve.

3
New cards

Free rider problem

Occurs when individuals benefit from resources or services without paying for them.

4
New cards

Median Voter Theorem

A project passes if the median voter's valuation is greater than the cost to that voter.

5
New cards

Arrow's General Possibility Theorem

Proves that a fair voting system is impossible under reasonable conditions.

6
New cards

Cycling

Outcome of a vote depends on the order of the choices.

7
New cards

Partial Public Goods

When some people can be excluded but not others.

8
New cards

Hidden action problem

A morale hazard where one party cannot observe the actions of another.

9
New cards

Hidden information problem

An adverse selection where one party cannot observe the quality of goods on the other side.

10
New cards

Signal

An indicator by producers of good-quality goods, such as a warranty.

11
New cards

Separating Equilibrium

When a signal forms two different equilibriums for two differently signaled things.

12
New cards

Pooling Equilibrium

When all parties make the same signal decision, with no signal present.

13
New cards

Sheepskin Effect

How a completed degree is more desirable than the same amount of education.

14
New cards

Information Asymmetries

Where one party has more information than the other party in a market.

15
New cards

Risk Aversion

The extent to which a person experiences disutility from risk.

16
New cards

Risk adverse

They lose utility from risk; depicted as a concave function.

17
New cards

Risk neutral

They neither gain nor lose utility from risk; depicted as a linear function.

18
New cards

Risk loving

They gain utility from taking risks; depicted as a convex function.

19
New cards

Risk Premium

The compensation required for someone to experience risk.

20
New cards

Adverse Selection

A pre-transaction risk caused by information asymmetry.

21
New cards

Moral Hazard

A post-transaction risk arising from information asymmetry.

22
New cards

Regulatory Capture

When government regulators align with the goals of private businesses.

23
New cards

Principal-agent Problem

A problem when a principal cannot monitor the efforts of the agent.

24
New cards

Reference Dependence

Outcomes are judged relative to a reference point.

25
New cards

Probability weighting

Distorts objective probabilities, overweighting small probabilities and underweighting larger ones.

26
New cards

Break Even Effect

Losers become more likely to take on risk to break even.

27
New cards

Endowment Effect

People demand more to give up an item than they would pay to get it.

28
New cards

Expected Value

The calculated value of outcomes adjusted by their probabilities.

29
New cards

Expected Utility

The sum of outcomes weighted by their probabilities.

30
New cards

Expected Utility Theory

The principle that people prefer options with the greatest expected utility.

31
New cards

St. Petersburg Paradox

An expected value paradox where infinite scenarios yield an expected value of infinity.

32
New cards

Alias Paradox

Proves the certainty effect, preferring certain outcomes over highly probable better outcomes.

33
New cards

Certainty effect

Overvaluing certain outcomes compared to uncertain ones.

34
New cards

Reflection effect

Risk preferences change based on how outcomes are perceived as gains or losses.