1/18
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Functional Techniques
measures the activity inside a tissue or region, or an organ.
monitors the changes in blood flow, metabolism, an area’s chemcials components
Temporal resolution (functional)
how fast functional techniques pick up on changes
PET
Positron Emmison Tomography (colourful)
injects a radio active tracer like glucose into blood stream where it goes to most active brain regions. get someone to perform a task during and get the patterns of activity. this shows which area uses more glucose (more active)
then reconstructed into computer generated images that are colour coded
can be combined with CT or MRI to make it more clear
fMRI (bold)
function MRI
the use of an MRI machine, while detecting which areas have the most oxygen (BOLD) blood oxygen dependent signal. areas with more oxygenated blood are higher activity
can show networks of activity in the brain but its not a direct measurement. were inferring based off of BOLD
dfMRI
two people are put into an MRI machine so you can study peoples interactions while in MRI machine
Temporal resolution for PET
it will captsure slow movment of metabolism but not fast activities
Spatial Res for PET
Moderate
Invassiveness of PET
Yes, because there is an injection of a radioactive tracer, and if you repeat it you risk too much radiaiton exposure
What are PETs better for studying
Metabolic changes
receptor binding
disease processes (oncology)
Temporal Resolution for fMRI
high she fast af (1-3 per scan) so fast tis good at mapping rapid changes in dynamic activity
Spatial Resolution for fMRI
High it can differentiate different area of the brain well (localizing them)
Invassiveness of MRI
Non invassive no radiation
fMRIs are Better at
mapping brain activity, function networks, and cognitive tasks
FNIRS
Functional near infrared Spectroscopy
uses an infared light to move through skin, skull and cortex, the reflection of this light is used to measure activity
FNIRS (pros and cons)
fast, non invasive, has compact apparatus
cons: only measures surface cortical regions, and has a lower spatial resolution
Speed accruacy trade off
Interpretation of brain imaging
to interpret brain imaging, you have a control and experimental condition. comparing the two show the difference image.
you then layer the difference images from multiple people to get an average/mean difference image
also just becuase an area of the brain is active doesn’t mean we know what they’re thinking about / whats causing the activation so techniques are correlational. this object related to the activation of hippocampus area, no conclusion
the dead salmon example
a dead salmon was put in an mri machine and when they presented a task to the fish, brain activity lit up, but since its literally dead it means false activity can occur. (random noise in MRI time series)
so we need to control for it by using multiple comaprisons
MEG
Magnetoencephalography
measures magnetic field giving off by neurons using SQUIDS
so it measures fast, has good spatial resolution (not for deep dtrucutres as much)
non invasive
no imaging