1/26
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Mixed actor model
Does not ignore state governments and sovereignty but argues that international politics is becoming shaped more by states and transitional groups
Sovereignty
The power of the state is highest
Balance of power
When states have similar power they cannot dominate each other which should lead to general equilibrium, more powerful and less powerful states cannot interact with each other peacefully
How does global governance challenged the balance of power theory?
More powerful states are able to peacefully work with smaller less powerful states, ex. US relations with Canada
First wave of globalization
1450: Columbian exchange, age of discovery
Second wave of globalization
1850-1945: major expansion of European empires
Third wave of globalization
1960-present: rise of microchips and satellites, a shift in power from west to east, and the rise of China
Fourth wave of globalization
In progress: new digital technology and emerging economic countries (Brazil, India, China)
Hard power
Military power
Soft power
Diplomatic power
Security dilemma
When one country takes action to protect itself (ex. building up nukes), it is seen as a threat to other countries and will lead to counter military activities, making the original country less secure than when it started
Dilemma of intention
We don't know why countries are increasing their military power, is it just in case or are they prepping for something
Dilemma of response
Should we react by building up our military or try to have diplomatic relations
Realist view of justice
Justice is irrelevant, national interest is more powerful than ethical considerations
World system theory
Refers to the division of labor globally, divides the world into core, semi-periphery, and periphery nations, core nations exploit the other nations
Core nations
Richest, most powerful, most developed, ex.U.S, Canada
Semi-periphery nations
Less developed, not dominant in global politics, between core and peripheral nations, ex. Brazil, India
Periphery nations
Least developed, weak governments, supply unskilled labor and resources, ex.Chile, Sudan
Modernization theory
Development is a purely internal factor, developing nations are still at a stage where they have not reached modernization but they will at some point
Realist theory
Skeptical of globalization, believe it mostly benefits the core nations, economic interdependence leaves all economies vulnerable, self-help
Liberal theory
Positive view of globalization, free-market, freer flow of ideas, liberal democracies, cooperation
Marxist theory
Globalization is hierarchical, corporations are too powerful in global governance (and in general)
Feminist theory
Globalization increases gender inequality especially in poorer countries where women who own small business must compete with multinational corporations
Postcolonial theory
Globalization is connected to western imperialism, western countries subvert indigenous cultures and support consumerism
Materialist theory
Globalization increases “worldwide connectivity which is open to empirical and historical methods of enquiry”
Constructivist theory
Globalization has no meaning, it is what we make of it, it is neither positive or negative
Ideological theory
"Political and economic project and ideology advanced by the most powerful states to fashion a world order according to their interests”