1/77
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What did Lenin and the Bolsheviks want to create when they seized power?
a communist society in which people are equal, and there is no poverty, goods are produced by machines rather than manual labour, and there is no repression because there is no state
What was Karl Marx’s view of class struggle, as outlined in what book
The Communist Manifesto (1848)
Slave society (Conflict between freemen and slaves) → leads to the appearance of a new stage in history
Feudal society (Conflict between landed aristocracy and growing bourgeoisie) → leads to the appearance of a new stage in history
Capitalist society (Conflict between the bourgeoisie and proletariat) → leads to the appearance of a new stage in history
Socialism: The Dictatorship of the Proletariat → gradual transition towards the final stage of history
Communism (Stateless and classless)
Why was Marx’s theories an issue for the Bolsheviks? Who tried to solve it?
Marx explained the development of history, but not how to move from one stage of history to another
Socialism needed capitalism to be achieved first, but Russia was economically and socially backward
Russia’s revolutionaries needed to push Russia towards capitalism so that it could be overthrown in a revolution
Lenin’s contributions to Marxism provided solutions to these problems
The Social Democratic Party split into two separate factions at the Second Congress in 1903
The party should comprise a small number of dedicated, highly disciplined revolutionaries
Centralised and hierarchical government
The purpose was to educate the working class about socialist ideals and lead to revolution
Mensheviks led by Martov
The party should be broad-based and take in a wide membership
A democratic structure that allows party members to argue against the ideas of the leadership
Improve the conditions of the working class before the revolution
More “Marxist” than the Bolsheviks, arguing it would take a long time for Russians to develop class consciousness
In 1905, a revolution broke out across Russia, and Lenin spent the next 12 years in exile. what happened to the party?
infiltrated by the Okhrana and internal divisions
why did Lenin believe that the outbreak of war in 1914 offered an opportunity for revolution
Once patriotic fervour had subsided, the working class should take up arms against Russian officers and capitalists
Despite critics saying that Lenin was not a Marxist, and used it as a cover for power, Lenin was a firm believer in the most fundamental principles of Marx, that a workers' movement must be revolutionary
Lenin’s contributions to Marxism provided some practicality to the theory. This can be defined as Marxist-Leninism. What were his three major works that influenced communist (bolshevik) ideology
What Is To Be Done? (1902)
Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism (1916)
The State and Revolution (1917)
Lenin’s modifications of Marxism were fused with the reality of the situation of Russia in 1917, including
Russia’s backwardness would make anti-capitalist revolution easier, as the bourgeoisie was less developed
Russia’s proletariat was small but concentrated and very powerful
Russia’s proletariat could not build socialism in Russia, but it sparked revolutions in more advanced Western Europe, which was ready for socialism
These socialist nations would come to Russia’s aid
Russia would not be classless, but more democratic than the Tsarist regime
A coercive apparatus would be needed because of internal enemies and external powers
A mixture of democracy and coercion was the defining element of the dictatorship of the proletariat
Elyse Topalian quote about Lenin
“It was a purely practical approach. It was his style to deal only in immediate practical issues. Lenin left only one issue, rather vague - how to govern in the aftermath of the revolution when the time came”
On 1 August 1914, Germany declared war on Russia, sparking patriotic fervour throughout the country despite the civil unrest that had plagued the country. How did Russia perform in the war?
Russia’s army was poorly led, poorly trained and enormously under-supplied
Russia was an 18th-century nation attempting to fight a 20th-century army
Within weeks, Russia suffered two massive defeats at the Battle of Tannenberg and the Masurian Lakes
By 1916-1917, Russia was beset with war-weariness, disillusionment and an ever-widening strike movement, mass desertions and army mutinies
The February Revolution of 1917 was spontaneous, as Richard Charques describes in The Twilight of Imperial Russia
“Without leadership and almost without conscious aim…the Russian revolution…sprang not so much from the will of the people but as from the mere decomposition and collapse of the tsar’s government”
The February Revolution began on International Women’s Day, 23 February, as mass demonstrations took place in Petrograd against fuel and food shortages. What happened as a result?
Strikes spread across the city, with hundreds of thousands of participants
Cabinet asks the tsar to form a new Duma, but Nicholas refuses
The government loses control of the city on 27 February as soldiers and police join demonstrators
The Tsar abdicated on 2 March 1917, ending the 300-year Romanov Dynasty and marking the beginning of the Provisional Government v Soviets
While the February Revolution was “leaderless and spontaneous”, the October Revolution in 1917 was
“a carefully planned coup d’etat”
The Bolshevik Party had nothing to do with the events of the February Revolution
Lenin was in Switzerland, Trotsky in New York, Stalin and others in Siberia
The abdication of the tsar on 2 March left a political vacuum, which was contested over between
the Provisional Government and the Soviets
The Soviets’ first decision was Order Number One, while the Provisional Government
placing Russia’s armed forces under its control
led by Prince Lvov, decided to continue its war against Germany
In early 1917, the Bolshevik party was a minor feature of Russian life until Lenin returned
How did Lenin return to Russia and what did he call for once he returned?
The German Government allowed Lenin to enter Russia in a sealed train, and arriving in Petrograd in April, he called for opposition to the Provisional Government, “All power to the Soviets”, and an immediate end to the war
What was issues was the Provisional Government facing
peasants seizing land and attacking landowners, increasing desertions from the army
In July, Alexander Kerensky became the leader of the Provisional Government, and was genuinely popular as he was also a member of the Soviet
However,
However, his decision to continue the war led to disaster as a key offensive against Germany failed, leading to the sailors at Kronstadt revolting
This was blamed on the Bolsheviks, and many were arrested as Lenin fled to Finland
Kerensky appointed General Kornilov as Commander in Chief, who led a coup against the Provisional Government in August 1917
What was the outcome of this?
This failed as soldiers, sailors, and workers mobilised to defend Petrograd, led by the Bolsheviks and their Red Guard Militias
Riding a wave of popularity, the Bolsheviks gained control of the Petrograd Soviet, among others, with Trotsky as its President
How did Lenin play a pivotal role in 1917, culminating in Bolshevik seizure of power
Ordered party members to end all cooperation with the Provisional Government on his return to Petrograd in April 1917
Lenin outlined the basis of future Bolshevik policy in The April Theses
Lenin’s insistence on total opposition, “All power to the Soviets”, disassociated the Bolsheviks completely from the string of failures that beset the Provisional Government in 1917
Allowed the party to establish a clear identity
Lenin’s use of simple sloganeering and populist positions transformed the Bolsheviks from a minor to a major force in months
“All power to the Soviets” → Appealed to workers and soldiers who saw their interests better represented than in the Provisional Government
“Peace, land and bread” → Major concerns of peasants
Lenin promised the peasants would acquire land, regardless of whether this clashed with Marxism
Russians wanted peace and bread, although Lenin never specified the cost
Why was the aftermath of the Kornilov coup was the only opportunity for the Bolsheviks to take power
Gained control of the Soviets, with Trotsky as the President of the Petrograd Soviet
Bolshevik efforts against the Kornilov coup made them true defenders of the revolution
The Provisional Government was demoralised after the failure of the July Offensive and Kornilov’s actions
What were reasons against seizure of power, and what was the final decision
Lenin had to convince the Bolsheviks of revolution, “History will never forgive us”, with Zinoviev and Kamenev still in opposition from fear of civil war
Lenin accepted Trotsky’s argument that the seizure of power be delayed until the meeting of the Second Congress of All-Russian Soviets on 25 October
This would present Bolshevik actions as in the name of all the Soviets, rather than the Bolshevik desire for power
What was Trotsky’s role in the October coup 1917
Trotsky successfully persuaded Lenin to postpone the coup until the Second Congress of All-Russian Soviets, announcing the overthrow of the Provisional Government at the Smolny Institute
The Soviets formed a Military Revolutionary Committee, which controlled the capital’s arms and military manpower, and in turn, which Trotsky controlled
Trotsky ordered Red Guards to enter the Winter Palace and arrest members of the Provisional Government
Trotsky directed Red Guard units and sympathetic soldiers to take control of key city locations such as railways and bridges
On 25 October, members of the Congress of Soviets condemned Bolshevik actions, and many walked out in protest into “the dustbin of history” as Trotsky ridiculed
what happened as a result?
Lenin announced the formation of a Bolshevik government, calling for peace with Germany and land for peasants
Although the coup was almost bloodless in Petrograd, the Bolsheviks had a harder time in Moscow
Adam Ulam
Christopher Hill
Robert V Daniel
“(Lenin) now dominated his Party morally and intellectually. Bolshevism without him was unimaginable”
“Hence Lenin’s own continual insistence on the necessity of both firm government and good relations with the mass of the peasantry”
“With…no intention before the fact, they had the city in the palms of their hands”
The Bolsheviks announced on 25 October at the All-Russian Congress of Soviets that they had seized power
What were the consequences of this?
Most Russians supported the idea of Soviet power, rather than Bolshevik power
They expected a coalition socialist government to emerge after the fall of the Provisional Government, with even some Bolsheviks believing so
The other socialist parties protested at what happened, arguing that the Bolsheviks did not represent the Russian people
Many walked out in protest, leaving the Bolsheviks and the left-wing Socialist Revolutionaries, making the Bolsheviks a majority in the congress
Lenin declared that a new Bolshevik government had been formed, called the Council of People’s Commissars or the SOVNARKOM
Who were the key figures
Lenin → Chairman
Trotsky → Commissar of Foreign Affairs (till February 1918), then Commissar of War
Rykov → Commissar of Internal Affairs
Kollontai → Commissar of Social Welfare
Lunacharsky → Commissar of Popular Enlightenment
Stalin → Commissar of Nationalities
The Bolshevik regime’s weaknesses at the end of 1917
Lack of coercive power
Lacked police, law enforcement bodies and a fully constituted army
While it had garrison support in towns it controlled, most of the country was not under its direct control
Many Soviets were controlled by non-Bolsheviks, while Bolshevik-controlled Soviets were often a ‘law unto themselves’
Lacked a government bureaucracy as civil servants went on strike, and the state bank refused to cooperate, making force necessary
The economy was a disaster, with food shortages and anarchy in the countryside
The war with Germany was still ongoing
The party performed badly in the Constituent Assembly elections
Why was the Bolshevik regime popular in the early motnhs of the regime
Early Bolshevik measures emphasised local control, such as worker control of factories and recognition of peasant land seizures
However, this view needs to be qualified by two key factors
The initial weaknesses of the regime gave Lenin no choice but to pass measures of a populist nature
This was accompanied by the creation of an authoritarian, coercive apparatus
SOVNARKOM did not gain sanction from the Soviets for its early measures, ruling by decree
Main decrees from 1917 to 1918
Lenin’s first measure was the Peace Decree
Lenin was prepared to pay any price to end the war with Germany, as this was the main failure of the Provisional Government
The Russian Commander-in-Chief, Dukhonin, refused to offer an immediate armistice and was replaced by Bolshevik lawyer Krylenko
Lenin’s second measure was the Land Decree
Peasants were given the right to seize the land of the gentry, and there was to be no compensation, as the land belonged to the entire people
Although private land ownership was a capitalist notion and the antithesis of a socialist revolution, they were forced to accede to the situation in Russia
They had little control over the peasants, and to oppose them would have brought down the new regime
A series of measures was passed in favour of the workers
Maximum of eight-hour working days
Unemployment pay, old age pensions and sickness benefits
Workers’ control of factories and railways
A series of measures were passed to break the power and wealth of the church
Church lands were confiscated, and civil marriages were introduced
In 1918, church and state were formally separated
A series of measures were passed to make men and women equal
The 1918 Marriage Code gave women legal equality with their husbands
Divorce was made easier, and abortion was legalised in 1920
The Zhenontdel, Women’s Department, was set up in 1921
A series of measures were passed to democratise the army
Army officers had to be elected
Officers were under the control of the army soviets and soldiers’ committees
Ranks were abolished, and there was an end to uniforms and saluting
In Lenin’s State and Revolution, he expressed his belief that the regime would be popular, but also the necessity of a strong coercive apparatus to consolidate power.
This led to the creation of what and for what purpose
The creation of the Extraordinary Commission against the Counter-Revolution, Sabotage and Speculation → CHEKA (1917)
Successor to the tsarist okhrana, led by Felix Dzerzhinsky, who was ruthless and incorruptible
The aim was to enforce conformity, fear and an atmosphere of intimidation, dealing with over 50,000 opponents in its first year
During the Civil War, the Cheka’s activities were known as the Red Terror, where freed from any restraints began boiling officers, serving them in half with saws, crucifying priests and skinning prisoners
The old legal system was replaced with revolutionary justice, arbitrary and violent
This saw what happen?
Targets of the new system were burzhui, members of the bourgeoisie class or anyone who was a perceived enemy of the people
Targeting the rich was popular with the peasants, and everyone was addressed as comrade
The Russian people had been promised a constituent assembly since March, and elections in November went badly for the Bolsheviks, gaining 24% of the vote
What was Bolshevik response?
The assembly met for one day before being shut down by SOVNARKOM troops
Lenin argued his government represented a higher stage of democracy, making the assembly unnecessary
What measures were put into place, destroying political opposition to SOVNARKOM
Closed down opposition newspapers, first targeting centre and right party publications and later other socialist publications
By December 1917, the Kadet Party, Mensheviks and right-wing Socialist Revolutionaries had been banned and members imprisoned
R H B Lockhart
Adam Ulam
“The Bolsheviks have established a rule of force and oppression unequalled in the history of any autocracy…(they) have restored the barbarous methods of torture.”
“The peasant, if not converted to Bolshevism, was at least pacified by the land decree. The spectre of Civil War was still not imminent”
Why was the crucial issue facing Lenin’s new government was the conclusion of the war with Germany
The country was desperate, with an economy in chaos and millions starving
The Bolsheviks' hold on power in late 1917 was not permanent, as general exhaustion prevented counter-revolutionary movements
Lenin insisted on peace with Germany at any price, but was met with opposition
What were their reasons and the final outcome?
Bukharin believed that Russia should launch a revolution in Germany, which would spread across Europe and end Russia’s isolation
Trotsky believed that Germany was in a weak state and surrender would benefit them, proposing a “no war, no peace” strategy
However, when the Germans moved on Petrograd, Lenin demanded that peace negotiations be pursued in earnest
Formal peace talks began on 22 December at Brest-Litovsk between Max Hoffmann, representing the German and Austrian Foreign Ministers, and the Bolshevik representative Adolf Ioffe
who replaced Ioffe and what were the repercussions?
Ioffe was replaced by Trotsky, who tried to slow down negotiations
German threat to resume hostilities against Lenin’s new regime forced the Bolsheviks to accept German terms, no matter how annexationist
A Party Central Committee meeting voted against this strategy and backed Trotsky’s “no war, no peace” line
When the Russians stopped their talks with the Germans, the attack resumed, and the Bolsheviks were forced to sue for peace
When was the Treaty of Brest Litovsk signed
3 March 1918
What were the main terms of the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk
Territorial provisions
Georgia, Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Finland and Ukraine received their independence, but were a German zone of influence
Russia lost 62 million people
Economic losses
Lost 32% of arable land, 26% of railways, 33% of factories and 75% of iron and coal mines
A later treaty in Berlin (August 1918) stated Russia had to pay a 6 million mark indemnity
Martin McCauley
“The communists could soothe their pride with the hope that, come the socialist revolution in Germany, the treaty would be torn up”
The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk had no long-term significance, as the German defeat in November 1918 made the provisions of the treaty null and void
What officially nullified this?
In the 1922 Treaty of Rapallo, Germany and the Soviet Union agreed to declare the Brest-Litovsk Treaty nullified mutually
The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk had significant short-term impact
On a political level, it removed one major concern for the Bolshevik government, the German threat, but created major consternation in Russia
Major arguments within the Bolshevik party over the treaty, but following Lenin’s entreaties, the party succumbed to reality and agreed to the terms
Destroyed relations between the Socialist Revolutionaries and the Bolsheviks
They voted against the ratification of the treaty and left SOVNARKOM, maintaining romantic revolutionary notions of war
The German ambassador to the Russian capital, Moscow, Count von Mirbach, was murdered by Bliumkin, a left Socialist Revolutionary
A left Socialist Revolutionary revolt saw Felix Dzerzinsky arrested, and a commander tried to declare war against Germany
The Bolsheviks changed their name to the All-Russian Communist Party
The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk was also a stimulus to the civil war, which was ultimately inevitable due to the widespread resistance of the Bolsheviks
Which groups were opposing the Bolsheviks and what were their motivations?
The left Socialist Revolutionaries, who tried to revolt, and banned parties, including the Kadets and the right Socialist Revolutionaries
Many were angered by the Bolshevik dissolution of the Constituent Assembly
Counter-revolutionary forces were gathering to remove the Bolsheviks for the sake of Russian territorial integrity, acting as a final catalyst
While the treaty was strategic for an impoverished and broken Russia, it led to disaster for Russia’s former western allies, leading to Allied intervention against the Bolsheviks
How did this occur?
The purpose of Allied intervention in Russia in 1918 was to bring Russia back into the war, but Allied troops remained on Russian territory long after
This duplicity is evidenced by allied forces assisting the Bolsheviks’ “white” enemies in the Civil War
Adam Ulam
“It would have been entirely logical - for the western capitalists to conclude a peace with the German capitalists and to join in the congenial task of destroying the Bolsheviks”
An uneasy peace prevailed in Russia for several months following the Bolshevik seizure of power in November 1917.
Why was this the case and when did this end?
Lenin and Trotsky knew that counter-revolutionary forces would take action soon, and by mid-1918, Russia was in the midst of a full-scale civil war
The war comprised three factions, denoted by colour
The “Reds” comprised the Bolsheviks and their supporters
The Workers and Peasants Red Army was reorganised by Trotsky in early 1918
Comprised of sailors from the Kronstadt base, former Red Guards, volunteer workers, peasants and officers from the Tsarist army
The Reds aimed to survive the civil war
The anti-Bolshevik “Whites” comprised a wide range of forces to destroy Bolshevism
Comprised of various competing groups such as members of opposing political groups (i.e., Socialist Revolutionaries), monarchists/rightists (who supported the Tsar), liberals (who supported military rule) and nationalist separatist groups
Each group was led by a particular general, including Kolchak, Yudenich, Kornilov, Denikin and Wrangel, which was a major weakness
The Whites also had foreign backing, including the Czech Legion and allied intervention
The third significant participant was the “Greens”
Predominantly peasant armies, who were concerned with protecting their local areas from Red and White forces
Comprised of both sides, and fought against both
By the end of the war, the Greens were fighting as an irregular Red force
Ranged in size from bandit gangs to well-coordinated guerrilla armies
Nestor Makhno was the most well-known Green leader, who had to escape to Romania to avoid Red persecution after the war
By mid-1918, White forces outnumbered the Reds, controlled most of Russia’s territory, had significantly greater military expertise and the prospect of Allied aid
Yet by 1919, the White cause had effectively collapsed
Reasons for allied victory
Issues of geography and unified organisation
The Whites were spread out too widely, making communication and coordination of different armies difficult because of distance, geography and climate
The Reds controlled a smaller area that contained most of Russia’s industry, railways and people, ensuring a constant supply of recruits, war materials and making communication and coordination easier
The Reds were united under a single cause and a tight, single command structure, whereas the Whites were divided by personal and political rivalries
White forces suffered from corruption and ill-discipline, having inferior leadership to Trotsky and Red commanders
The importance of fighting for a cause
Reds presented themselves as ‘the lesser evil’, and peasants knew that Whites meant a certain loss of their land, and nationalist groups knew that the Whites offered no chance of autonomy or independence
War Communism was detested by peasants, but ensured the survival of industrial areas under Red control and kept Red armies fed
Even workers did not support War Communism, but knew Red victory was needed to maintain gains made in 1917
The role of Trotsky
Transformed militias into an effective fighting force, with tight structure, ranks, saluting and uniforms
Former tsarist officers were used to provide training, organisation and leadership, with their families taken hostage to ensure loyalty
Political Commissars were appointed to watch officers' behaviour
Army committees, formed after the revolution, were replaced with a hierarchy
Strict discipline was enforced, including flogging and capital punishment
Trotsky was always on trains, inspiring men on the spot
The role of propaganda
While foreign intervention gave the Whites access to supplies, it made valuable Red propaganda
Arguing that they were fighting as defenders of ‘mother Russia’ against foreigners (not a socialist but a popular notion)
Through propaganda, Reds convinced the populace that White victory would mean a return to bosses, landlords and old-style army
Offered a prospect of a new society
What is war communism
a series of extreme policies that Lenin introduced from mid-1918 to deal with the disastrous economic and military situation that the Bolsheviks were facing
Involved the imposition of state control over economic production, distribution and grain output, and the use of widespread terror to achieve this goal
Reasons for war communism
By mid-1918, the only issue for the Bolsheviks was survival
Military defeat was a possibility as White forces emerged from three sides, with Allied intervention arriving
The prime goal was to maintain the Red Army on the field and the factories producing war equipment
The Bolsheviks’ industrial policies, after the October Revolution, although popular, had led to economic collapse
Workers were incapable of running the factories
Land policies had resulted in plummeting food production
Peasants were unconcerned with the cities, as they had little to offer in exchange for grain
Peasant households had broken up to increase claims of land, which returned to subsistence farming
Lenin believed that the only solution was for the state to take control of the economy, reorganise factories and force peasants to give up their grain for the cities
War communism comprised the following elements
All industries were nationalised and brought under state control
The Bolsheviks ended inept and corrupt workers committees and placed managers, often previous bosses, now called “specialists”
Workers could not leave their jobs without permission, as an internal passport system was introduced
Strict rules regarding labour discipline were introduced
The market economy was stopped, as the state would decide on the production and distribution
A class-based rationing system was introduced, with soldiers and workers receiving the most, while burzhui (former bourgeoisie) received the least
Rationing was chaotic, and a black market developed
In 1919, the party tried to put an end to the use of money by flooding the market with useless banknotes
Resulted in hyperinflation and the appearance of a barter system
The land was socialised, with peasants ordered to work for the state and produce requisitioned by food detachments, sent to prevent hoarding
Led to widespread violence between the Red forces (Cheka) and the peasants
Impact of war communism
From a Bolshevik perspective, War Communism was a success
The army and towns were kept fed and were able to win the Civil War
The ideology of War Communism, with its policies of state control, direction and the apparent end to private property, aligned with the goals of the Party
However, from an economic, social and humanitarian perspective, War Communism was disastrous for the country
Peasants chose to destroy their grain and livestock rather than give it up, refusing to sow future crops, gorging on food and killing livestock
This led to even more extreme brutality from the Food Detachments and the Cheka
Lenin insisted that any opposition be met with the most serious demands, executing hundreds of richer peasants known as kulaks
People could be arrested for behaving or appearing as bourgeois
Millions died from starvation, execution or imprisonment in labour camps
Class warfare was encouraged by the party and welcomed by many Russians
What did this look like
Former houses of aristocrats and the middle class were divided amongst the poor
The proletariat humiliated their class enemies, leading to state-approved violence in the streets
Civil War + War Communism
David Christian
Robert Service
Gordon Greenwood
“Did the job of supplying towns and armies with just enough food and supplies to keep providing war material and to keep fighting. In this sense, it was a success”
“What took everyone aback was his organisational capacity and ruthlessness as he transformed the Red Army into a fighting force”
“The outcome was the disastrous famine of 1921, rendered worse by the general drought which immediately preceded it…Some five million are estimated to have died from starvation”
The Bolsheviks had emerged victorious from the Civil War, and the country was in a disastrous state
While War Communism had played a key role in Communist victory, it had alienated peasants, wrecked the economy and created ongoing opposition to Communist rule
This can be seen in
the Kronstadt Naval Base revolt in 1921, which had been suppressed by Trotsky’s Red Army
In 1917, these sailors had been avid supporters of the Bolsheviks, despite most sailors being peasants who were aware of peasant suffering under War Communism
Lenin decided to reverse policy with the introduction of the New Economic Policy
This allowed
a return to capitalism, the operation of the free market and a degree of private ownership to revive the Russian economy
While this allowed for economic liberalisation, Lenin had no intention of easing the authoritarian nature of the Communist regime, in the face of two major revolts, such as…
Peasant revolt in the Tambov region on the river Volga
Led by Alexander Antonov, they refused to hand over grain and prevented grain convoys from being sent to Moscow
The Communists did not have many troops in this area, and Lenin did not want to incite a general peasant revolt
Lasted almost an entire year
Kronstadt revolt
The crews of the Battleships Sevastopol and Petropavlovsk called a meeting about government repression of strikes in the city
Angered by government actions, the sailors passed a resolution containing 15 demands of the Communist government, including
Free elections to the Soviets
An equalisation of wages
The right of peasants to dispose of grain as they saw fit
An end of roadblock detachments and the right to bring food into the city
Freedom of speech, of the press and assembly
Trotsky saw this as a major threat, and the response was brutal
Under Tukachevsky, Red Army troops made their way across the ice, followed by Cheka units to ensure no desertions/retreats
15,000 were killed in the suppression of the revolt, leaders were shot without trial, and the remainder were sent to labour camps
While Kronstadt was a catalyst, Lenin was aware that the situation in 1921 was being compared to the revolutions of 1905 and 1917
Why was this?
Russia was experiencing one of the most severe famines of the century, with up to 5 million dead, and emergency aid was being accepted from the US
Between 1914 and 1920, the birth rate in Petrograd dropped 50%, and the death rate increased 4x, with diseases such as cholera and typhus rife
The economic collapse of Russia was catastrophic
In 1921, industrial output was 16% of its 1912 level
Mining was 29%, oil 36% and grain 48%
When did Lenin push for NEP and what was it described as
Lenin reluctantly pushed for NEP at the 10th Party Congress in 1921, as capitalism was the antithesis of the party's values
Congress made it clear that NEP was a ‘tactical retreat’, as Zinoviev said, a short-term necessity
Main elements of NEP
Grain requisitioning ended, and peasants would hand over a proportion of their output
This later became a cash sum, and surpluses could be sold on the open market for profit
Small businesses were allowed to operate, such as workshops and cafes
Permissible to hire labour
Ensured goods were available for peasants to buy
The state retained ownership and control of major industries, including banks, transport and electrification of the country
Private trade was allowed, an end to rationing and a return to a cash economy
The short-term impacts of NEP
There was enough food, shops and restaurants had reopened, and the country had returned to normalcy
Within three years, industrial output was up to 200%
Individuals were allowed to operate in the real area
NEPmen, a new class, appeared who sought to buy up surplus goods and sell them in the markets
NEPmen were controlling almost three-quarters of industrial trade
This was accompanied by all the evils of capitalism
Corruption was common, and NEPmen were constantly doing deals
Crime and prostitution increased
Why was NEP a problem?
it did not offer an answer to Russia’s long-term development
In ideological terms, Russia was in the socialist stage of development that preceded communism
Marx’s vision of communism was based on abundance, which is why they needed Russia to modernise and industrialise
The problem for NEP was that it was not creating the necessary capital that was essential for industrial development
The Bolsheviks had evaded this problem with the belief that revolutions would spread across Western Europe, which would in turn assist Russia with capital
This was not the case, with a few failed attempts at revolution in Germany and Hungary
As an isolated socialist state, Russia needed to modernise alone and defend itself
David Christian (NEP)
“Building socialism in Russia meant undertaking rapid economic growth without help from abroad, with the continual threat of foreign intervention, and in a hostile peasant environment”
Trotsky had flagged the dilemma Russia was facing at the 12th Party Congress in 1923, which became known as the scissors crisis
The prices of urban-produced industrial products were increasing (due to poor production techniques, lack of economies of scale) while the prices of rural agricultural goods were falling (due to increased peasant productivity after the end of War Communism)
Peasants were limiting/hoarding their output due to high-priced and low-quality consumer goods coming from the cities
After two years of NEP, Trotsky understood that industrial growth was behind the recovery in agriculture
As peasants made up the majority of the population, sources of capital would have to be found in the rural sector for industrial development
As peasants limited their output, Russia’s main source of capital was depleting
Martin McCauley (NEP)
“At first the peasants paid a tax in kind, but with the stabilisation of the currency in 1923, this could be paid in money - Soviet Russia was back to a money economy”