1/5
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
publlished
1656
main arguments
uses bible as only source, the same source witchfinders use to justify their acts.
states that these acts against witches cannot be condoned by bible
was compelled to write it because of wrongful convictions and stupidity of familiars
cites scot’s 1584 directly
what were the three main sections?
difined witches according to the bible as catholic magicians
argues that catholics misinterpreted the original scripture and that catholics were the first to kill for religion
criticised the king’s daemonologie and other pro-witch hunt pamphlets
anti_ sentiment
anti-Catholic
How does this increase skepticism
steep decline in hunts after this
still believed in witches but highlights discrepancy between bible definition and 13th century inrerp. UNDERMINED belief
No change?
wenham still guilty in 1712
illiterate
1604 act not repealed until 1734