1/87
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
equivalence principle
Being in free fall is equivalent to being in 0 gravity space
Being in accelerating frame feels like gravity and can't be distinguished
understanding free falling satellites
All satellites in orbit around Earth are in free fall
Combo of speed at given moment in time and acceleration makes them move in circle
SPACETIME and gravity
Space and time are part of spacetime
3 dimensions of space, 1 dimension of time
Motions of objects as function of time
Objects are moving through spacetime
light's path bends due to gravity
Einstein realized this should happen
Bending of light predicted by Einstein is twice that predicted by Newton
Gravity is curvature in spacetime, not force
motion of mercury
Mercury has eccentric orbit (0.21) and orientation of major axis changes slightly over time
Partly expected due to gravitational preturbations from jupiter and saturn
Offset of 40 arcseconds no one could explain, maybe planet close to Sun (vulcan)
Einstein predicted offset of 43 arcseconds per century
deflection of starlight
Eddington read paper by Einstein
Looked for effect during eclipse in South Africa and Brazil in 1919
Einstein's predictions were true to 20% precision
gravitational lensing
Can cause objects to appear in different position, look brighter, or both
spacetime and GRAVITY
Stronger gravity = slower pace of time
We live in low-gravity environment
surface gravity on surface of neutron stars
100 lbs on Earth is 300 trillion pounds on Neutron star
Escape velocity is half of speed of light
limits of fighting gravity
Earth held up by fact that it's hard to squeeze rocks
Sun held up by pressure from lots of nuclear explosions
White dwarfs held up by fact that it's hard to squeeze electrons
Neutron stars held up by fact that it's hard to squeeze neutrons
No known force can fight black holes
event horizon of black hole
Schwarzchild calculated radius from which light can't escape a point mass in general relativity (Schwarzchild radius/event horizon)
Radius proportional to mass of black hole
falling into black hole
Current physical theories allow us to calculate how things behave up to singularity
Observer falling into black hole sees rest of universe blueshift as he approaches event horizon
If he sends signals once per second, they appear to take longer and longer to outside observers
For massive black holes, spaghettification happens inside black hole as tidal forces are shallower at surface
surface gravity of black holes
More massive black holes have smaller surface gravity
Radius of event horizon grows with mass, but gravity grows with radius
Billion solar mass black hole has 1500 times more gravity than Earth
evidence for black holes
We see motion around black holes, accretion on black holes, and gravitational waves
accretion onto black holes
Gas that falls into black hole gets accelerated to very high speeds
If a little energy escapes as light, it's more efficient engine to make light than star
Luminosities of super massive black holes near centers of most large galaxies can reach 1 trillion solar luminosities
mapping milky way galaxy
Hard to map Milky Way Galaxy because we live inside it
milky way galaxy has disk
Herschels were first astronomers to state Milky Way is shaped as disk
Sun is never in middle because there was the same number of stars in every direction
That's not true, it's only because of interstellar dust dimming stars
harlow shapley and milky way cartography
Shapley estimated distances to 93 globular clusters using period-luminosity relations of variable stars
Spherical distribution with center not near Sun but within disk and toward constellation sagittarius
disks and haloes
Halo is said to contain almost entirely old, metal-poor stars that formed with galaxy
Disk contains every kind of star making it younger and more metal-rich
Milky Way's Disk contains bar in central regions
spiral structure
Found in radio observations
We see gas located in specific lines of sight
Sun located in Orion spur
spiral arms
Gas clouds have differential rotation
Parts furthest from center of galaxy move at different speeds than parts close to center
Arms form their own self-gravity
keplerian estimate for galaxy’s mass
Sun takes 225 million years to go around Galaxy and semi-major axis is 27,000 light years
We get 100 billion solar masses an estimate if we use Newton’s genralization of Kepler’s third law
Not quite right as Sun’s orbit isn’t quite and ellipse and there’s isn’t one point mass at center of galaxy, but rather a disk of mass with distribution of mass
orbital speeds in galaxy vs. solar system
Galactic orbital speeds constantly at large radii
Solar system orbital speeds decline at large radii
missing mass
Distant objects orbit galaxy really fast in spite of there being very few visible objects out there
Either our theory is wrong or dark matter is out there
modified gravity vs dark matter
Modified gravity models vary, but common model is that at very low accelerations, gravity is stronger than expected
Dark matter models also vary but common model is that there’s another particle, undetected by current particle accelerates that doesn’t interact much with protons and electrons but accounts for most of universe matter mass
lots of stuff near center of galaxy
We see a ton of old stars near black hole, a hundredish OB stars indicating recent star formation but no ongoing star formation
Sagittarius A*
Lots of mass which we can infer from stars moving rapidly
We can’t see the mass, stars orbit around nothing
Supermassive black hole with mass of 4 million solar masses
One star gets as close as 124 AU from black hole
how do supermassive black holes form
Nearly every massive galaxy has one at center
When massive stars dies, they form black holes of 20-30 solar masses
Having these reach 4 million or 4 billion solar masses, either by accreting hydrogen or having merger trees doesn’t seem to work mathematically
thin disk vs halo orbits
Stars in thin disk have circular orbits
Stars in halo have random and elliptical orbits
two kinds of stars
Discovered by Walter Baade during WWII
Blackout of Los Angeles during war to make it harder for enemy submarines made the skies darker (good for astronomy)
Population I for bright blue stars in spiral arms
Population II for stars in Halos and globular clusters
Pop I and Pop II Stars
Pop I stars found only in disk and in nearly circular orbits
Bright supergiants, bright main-sequence stars, stars in spiral arms, and stars of young open clusters
Pop II stars found everywhere in galaxy
Both circular and eccentric orbits
RR lyrae stars and globular cluster stars
Pop II stars formed first
Pop II stars are 10-14 billion years old and Pop I are less than 12 billion years old
Pop I stars have have 1-4% of their mass in elements heavier than hydrogen and helium
Pop II stars have less, sometimes their 99.999% hydrogen and helium
All stars in Milky Way are Pop I stars
Why Younger Stars Have More Metals
Universe stars with 75% hydrogen, 25% helium, and tiny amount of other elements
Overtime, more heavy elements (metals) are contributed to interstellar gas from supernovae
And other dying stars
That’s why Sun has 1.5-2% heavy metals
Stars form heavy elements in interiors through nuclear fusion
When stars die, heavy elements released to interstellar medium
New stars form from enriched gas
Older stars have fewer metals
protogalactic cloud and monolithic collapse model
galactic mergers occur over time
Galaxies merge with random orientations which can add shape and structure to galaxy
Sagittarius dwarf spheroidal is small galaxy accreted by Milky Way and makes big stream
Globular cluster M54, probably its nuclear star cluster
expanding universe
From general relativity, universe is expected to expand or contract
Einstein added a cosmological constant to keep it static
Hubble used observations of variable stars in other galaxies in combination of Leavitt law to measure distances and redshifts to measure speeds to show distant galaxies are moving away from us
hubble time
Big Bang was when all galaxies were close together
Hubble’s constant says that objects further away move faster
hubble time / age of the universe
Hubble time is time when galaxy separation was 0
H0 is rate of expansion and 1/H0 gives age of universe
Universe is 13.8 billion years old
accelerating expansion
In 1990s, astronomers used standard candles to measure universe expansion
Want to measure deceleration of expansion of universe
They measured acceleration, things were moving faster away from each other over time even though gravity should be pulling them back
Dark energy is pulling the universe apart and astronomers parameterize it with cosmological constant
future pathways to studying universe
European Extremely Large Telescope being built in Chile will have 39 m mirror, making it most powerful telescope in the world
Will directly measure accelerating expansion of universe
expansion of universe
Space itself is expanding
Only expansion in voids between galaxy clusters because galaxies have enough gravity that they can be same size
Wavelength of light in accelerating universe also expands
cosmic tug of war
Gravity
From light, matter, and dark matter, pulls things together
With enough gravity, universe expansion will slow down and maybe reverse
Dark energy
Mysterious force pushing things outward
Could cause acceleration to be faster and faster
eventual fate of universe
We don’t know since we don’t understand dark energy
We expect big chill where we only see the galaxy we’re in, all stars die, only black holes left
critical density of universe
Density needed to bring universe’s expansion to stop at infinity, then universe will have fixed size
Universe has density of 30% of this quantity, so universe will expand forever
Combined density of matter and dark energy is equal to critical density
ages of distant galaxies
Astronomers quote ages in terms of redshift
Redshift z =1 galaxies is seen from when universe was half its current size
Red shift z =2 is a third and so on
history of an idea
Beginning of universe is implied by equations of general relativity
Lemaitre described meaning of these equations
Described universe as beginning with giant primeval atom that broke into pieces that formed seeds for galaxies
primeval fusion
Physicists today know more about nuclear physics and know that his primeval fission model cant be correct
Instead it’s a primeval fusion model, big bang nucleosynthesis
elements of big bang
Gamow and Alpher made us now believe that only hydrogen, 25% helium, and tiny bit of lithium were produced in big bang
Heavier elements formed later in stars
first few minutes
Earlier we go in time, the higher the mean temperature, pressure, and density of universe
Early in universe’s life when it was extremely hot, it was mostly just radiation but at higher energies there might be dark matter
t = 0
Our theories of physics can almost get us to t=0
We don’t know if anything came before universe
.01 seconds
At .01 seconds, universe was a soup of matter and radiation
Particles always collided and temp was high enough for light to produce electrons and positrons but not protons and neutrons
3 minutes
atomic nuclei form
Not before, atomic nuclei are disassociated by high energy photons
Later, energy from radiation is low enough that electrons can bind to protons
300,000 years after big bang, universe no longer ionized
on first few minutes
The fact that from big bang theory one can derive 25% mass for helium is huge success
cosmological lithium problem
Factor of 3 error for abundance of lithium
Universe seems to contain 70% less lithium than expected
deuterium
Isotope of hydrogen which has proton and neutron in nucleus
cosmic microwave background
300,000 years after big bang, density dropped enough for electrons and protons to form stable hydrogen
Lot less traffic for photons/light and the universe became transparent
First free light of universe and now it’s cooled to be cosmic microwave background
properties of cosmic microwave background
Nearly perfect match to predictions
Mean temp of 2.73 K
Good confirmation that universe evolved from initial, hot state
cosmic microwave background not perfectly uniform
Universe couldn’t be since we have galaxies and voids between them
Density fluctuations when CMB was made, 380,000 years after big bang, was 1 part in 100,000
triangles on sphere can have 270 degrees inside
Our universe has flat geometry
Angles inside triangle add up to 180 degrees and parallel lines meet at infinity
Universe could’ve actually been slightly spherical or hyperolical
On saddle/hyperboloid, they’re less than 180 degrees
standard model of cosmology
If anybody measures a different model than the parameters, they refute it
Universe maybe a little older than 13.8 billion years and Hubble’s constant may be a little bigger than 67.31 km/s/Mpc
composition of universe
5% of all mass and energy in universe is matter we’re familiar with on earth
Most ordinary matter is hydrogen and helium in interstellar and intergalactic space
0.5% of universe critical density of universe is in stars
Dark matter and energy is 95%
changing understanding of universe
In 1970s, we suspected that most of matter in universe was invisible but we thought this might be ordinary matter (protons, electrons) not producing electromagnetic radiation
By 1980s, it was clear that it was dark matter we hadn’t figured out yet
By 1990s, experiments showed we live in critical density universe and dark energy contributes 70% of what’s required to reach critical density
elusive nature of dark matter
Extensions of standard model of particle physics to include weakly interacting massive particles are most widely studied model of dark matter but isn’t proven to be true
We’ve never seen indirect evidence for dark matter at Large Hadron Collider
2 problems about universe
Density of universe is close to critical density
Most values would be too high (universe has quick crunch) or too low (dark energy wins too early and there’s no galaxies)
Universe is very homogenous
How can parts of universe that never interacted with one another only differ by one part in 100,000?
universe being flat
Within our theories of gravity, flat or positve/negative curvatures of universe are all okay
Infinite number of positive or negative curvature values that universe could have
Flat universe could only have 0 curvature and that’s what we live in
inflation
Small regions come in contact with each other and blow up much larger and outside each other’s horizon distance
Increase of 10^50 in size in 10^-35 seconds
Bigger scale difference than that of observable universe in proton
Even if universe had curvature, rapid increase in size would flatten it
We still don’t know what causes inflation
anthropic principle
Universe seems fine-tuned for life
Density fluctuations in universe are large enough for galaxies to form but small enough so matter doesn’t collapse into black holes
If nuclear reactions occured more easily, everything would’ve gone to iron in big bang rather than 25% helium and stars would’ve never formed
If nuclear reactions were harder, pressure support from them would be harder and stars would collapse into white dwarfs, neutron stars, or black holes
standard model of universe
4% regular matter, 23% dark matter, 73% dark energy, and period of inflation early on
Requires dark matter or modified gravity, dark energy, and inflation
human body composition
99% of mass comes from oxygen, carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, calcium, and phosphorus
Complex life on Earth requires a lot of elemental abundance and liquid water to act as medium for things to move through
copernican principle
Nothing special about our place in universe
Galileo showed solar system doesn’t orbit Earth
Sun isn’t special star
Milky way isn’t special galaxy
Planets around other stars are common
We don’t know if complex biochemistry is common in universe or to what extent it evolves
giordano bruno
Priest of Dominican Order
Realized and argued that stars were just like Sun, that planets must orbit these Suns, and sentient beings lived on these planets
fermi’s paradox
There should be aliens but there’s no evidence despite many chances and decades of searching
proposed solutions
Life isn’t common
Life is common, but intelligent life isn’t
Intelligent life is common, but we can’t see their signals
Intelligent life is common, but doesn’t interfere
Intelligent life always self destructs
Government is keeping intelligent life a secret
building blocks of life
We’ve seen building blocks like water, sugars, alcohol, formaldehyde, and amino acids
We haven’t seen proteins in space
miller-urey experiment
UChicago in 1952
Started with methane, ammonia, and hydrogen
Added electric spark source as there would be in early Earth and amino acids were produced
Scientists analyzed vials in 2007 with more advanced techniques and found it was more successful
We don’t know original atmospheric composition of Earth
habitable zone
Water on planet is neither vaporized nor frozen
Too close to star, water is vapor
Too far from star, water is frozen
Larger distance for hotter stars
Stars evolve as they age and typically get hotter so habitable zone will move
Life can take billions of years to evolve
Planets themselves can effect temperature like Earth or Venus
role of other system bodies in keeping earth habitable
Jupiter and Saturn protect Earth from asteroids and comets, without them, Solar System would have many more comets and asteroids
Moon keeps Earth’s axial tilt stable, without it there would eventually be much more extreme seasonal variations
Moon extended Earth’s day, without it, the day would be 18 hours
phase diagram of water
Point at which water can be liquid is function of pressure
Also function of salt content and other properties
limits on extremophiles
We’ve seen life function in temps from -25 to 122 C
High temp organism can survive to due high pressures that keep water liquid at those temps
We’ve seen life span acid-base range of 0 (acid) to 13 (alkaline)
High levels of salt are bad, thats why we use it as preservative
Some microbes can grow in water ten times saltier than sea water
life on mars
People thought images of Mars were fake
Edgar Rice Burroughs wrote “Princess of Mars” which influenced lots of sci-fi stories
Probably used to have liquid water but no evidence of it today
Viking landers of 1970s found no organic molecules or organic activity
Curiosity (2012) confirmed Mars once had habitable environments with water, energy, and raw materials like benzene and propane
Found alkanes with 12 consecutive carbon atoms
El Presidente wants people on Mars
life in outer solar system
Jupiter’s moon Europa and Saturn’s moons Titan and Enceladus are believed to be good candidates for life
Outside habitable zone of solar system but have tidal heating from nearby planets
case for life on europa
Salty ocean beneath crust
NASA’s $5 billion Europa Clipper will get there in 2031 to search for habitability
Will measure composition of gaseous plumes coming out of Europa as well as dust and ice grains leaving it
Measuring magnetic field should inform if it has salty ocean
case for life on titan
Has lakes and rivers of methane and petrochemicals
Might harbor different kind of life
Lack of liquid water and very cold temps (-180 C) mean large biomass is unlikely
dragonfly mission to titan
Will launch in 2028 and arrive in 2034
Will use helicopter to travel which works since Titan has thicker atmosphere than Earth (50% more atmospheric pressure) but 85% less surface gravity
Will fly 8 km at a time
Should be able to measure different compositions at different sites
case for life on enceladus
Has subsurface oceans
Blasts plumes of water vapor into space which contain lots of minerals and organic compounds
Hard to go there since it’s very far away and surface gravity is 98.8% weaker than Earth
Enceladus Orbilander is proposed to launch 2038 and arrive 2045-2051
habitable world observatory
Proposed launch date of 2041, mirror of 6-8 m, and cost of $11 billion
Main objective would be to identify at least 25 habitable worlds
Use spectroscopy to search for chemical biosignatures in atmospheres including gases like oxygen and methane which would serve as critical evidence for life
Would use high sensitivity and resolution capabilities to trace evolution of galaxies and other cosmic structures
tianlin space telescope
From china expected to launch earlier than HWO and be less powerful
drake equation
We know R* and Fp pretty well now and Milky Way forms roughly one star per year and half of them can host planets
Astronomers rapidly learning frequency of planets as function of star type, planet mass, and planet-star separation
Ne (number of planets per solar system with environment suitable for life) and Fi (fraction of suitable planets which life appears) are now unknown but we should be able to measure/limit them in the next 30 years
Anything about life becoming intelligent, whether intelligent life lasts or choose to communicate is beyond technology over the next few decades
SETI
Uses network of radio telescopes to search for alien radio signals
So far they’ve found nothing