1/15
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
similarities between the studies
research method
adherence to ethical guidelines
data collected
internal validity
reliability
differences between the studies
sample chosen
sampling method
apparatus required
findings
ecological validity
research method
similarity
both lab experiments
sample chosen
difference
loftus n palmer : all students were from the same school so not representative
grant : ppts were recruited, could be students, parents but has a large age range (17-56)
sampling method
difference
loftus n palmer : volunteer sample / self-selected
grant : opportunity into snowball sample
adherence to ethical guidelines
similarity
both adhered to ethical issues
was some deception in loftus n palmer
apparatus required
difference
loftus n palmer : video of a car crash
grant : headphones, texts to learn, questionnaire with short answer questions and multiple choice
data collected
similarity
both collected quantitative data
findings
difference
loftus n palmer : more ‘violent’ verbs such as smashed gave higher speed estimations and made ppts believe they had seen smashed glass
grant : studying and answering questions in the same condition gives better correct results
internal validity
similarly
both had high internal validity and high levels of control
ecological validity
difference
loftus n palmer : low ecological validity as video clips so low emotional arousal
grant : high as they were asked to do an everyday task
reliability
similarity
both high as high levels of control and standardised procedures used in both, also replicable results
freewill vs determinism
determinism
loftus n palmer : results were due to how we process information
grant : results down to our cognitive processes
reductionism vs holism
reductionism
loftus n palmer : too simplistic to explain
grant : brain is not just like a computer
usefulness of research
loftus n palmer : helpful in witness testimonies and shows the effect of leading questions
grant : helpful to improve how we should revise
psychology as a science
both support as they were lab experiments