Private Nuisance

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/19

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 1:41 PM on 5/28/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

20 Terms

1
New cards

Who can claim in private nuisance?

A person can claim only if they have legal interest in the land which is more than just living there (Hunter V Canary Wharf)

2
New cards

Hunter V Canary Wharf

A person must have legal interest in the land not just live there in order to claim private nuisance

3
New cards

Who can be sued in private nuisance?

  • Person causing or allowing the nuisance (Tetley V Chitty)

  • Person who adopts the nuisance (O’calllaghan)

  • Person who fails to deal with a natural risk (Leaky V National Trust)

4
New cards

Tetley V Chitty

Person causing or allowing the nuisance

5
New cards

O’callaghan

Person who adopts the nuisance - knows the nuisance exists and does nothing about it

6
New cards

Leaky V National Trust

Person who fails to deal with natural risks

7
New cards

What is private nuisance claim?

Claimant must show an unreasonable interference with their use and enjoyment of their land

  • Established by asking whether it is reasonable for the claimant to tolerate the interference?

  • Mere irritation is not enough

8
New cards

What factors are considered when decided if something is a nuisance?

  • Duration

  • Sensitivity of claimant

  • Locality

  • Malice

9
New cards

Duration

Duration and intensity of interference is considered (Crown River Cruises)

10
New cards

Sensitivity of claimant

If claimants use of land is abnormally sensitive, it is less likely to be a nuisance; This is because defendants use of their land should not be restricted by others specialised or sensitive activities (Robinson V Kilvert)

11
New cards

Locality

What constitutes a nuisance in one place will not be in another (Sturges V Bridgman)

12
New cards

Malice

Where a defendant deliberately choses an activity with the intention of it affecting the claimants enjoyment of their land (Hollywood Silver Fox Farms V Emmett); This counts even if D is responding to original nuisance from the claimant

13
New cards

Defences

  • Prescription

  • Statutory authority

  • Volenti

14
New cards

Prescription

Provided there has been a known actionable nuisance for 20 years or more without complaints, then D gains prescriptive right to continue the nuisance ( Sturges V Bridgman); Timer only starts once the nuisance becomes actionable

15
New cards

Statutory authority

Permission granted in an act of parliament; this is a completed defence

16
New cards

Volenti

defendant can show that the claimant has taken active steps to encourage the nuisance

17
New cards

Moving to the nuisance

Courts will take into account the character of the area and establish whether the actions of the defendant are out or character for the area; Moving to the nuisance is not a defence meaning a newcomer can successfully bring in a nuisance claim

18
New cards

Remedies

  • Injunctions

  • Abatement

  • Damages

19
New cards

Injunctions

Prohibitive = prevents the person from doing something

Positive = require the defendant to do something to limit the expense of the nuisance

20
New cards

Abatement

Courts provide authority for the claimant to prevent or reduce the nuisance (Lemmon V Webb)