1/19
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Who can claim in private nuisance?
A person can claim only if they have legal interest in the land which is more than just living there (Hunter V Canary Wharf)
Hunter V Canary Wharf
A person must have legal interest in the land not just live there in order to claim private nuisance
Who can be sued in private nuisance?
Person causing or allowing the nuisance (Tetley V Chitty)
Person who adopts the nuisance (O’calllaghan)
Person who fails to deal with a natural risk (Leaky V National Trust)
Tetley V Chitty
Person causing or allowing the nuisance
O’callaghan
Person who adopts the nuisance - knows the nuisance exists and does nothing about it
Leaky V National Trust
Person who fails to deal with natural risks
What is private nuisance claim?
Claimant must show an unreasonable interference with their use and enjoyment of their land
Established by asking whether it is reasonable for the claimant to tolerate the interference?
Mere irritation is not enough
What factors are considered when decided if something is a nuisance?
Duration
Sensitivity of claimant
Locality
Malice
Duration
Duration and intensity of interference is considered (Crown River Cruises)
Sensitivity of claimant
If claimants use of land is abnormally sensitive, it is less likely to be a nuisance; This is because defendants use of their land should not be restricted by others specialised or sensitive activities (Robinson V Kilvert)
Locality
What constitutes a nuisance in one place will not be in another (Sturges V Bridgman)
Malice
Where a defendant deliberately choses an activity with the intention of it affecting the claimants enjoyment of their land (Hollywood Silver Fox Farms V Emmett); This counts even if D is responding to original nuisance from the claimant
Defences
Prescription
Statutory authority
Volenti
Prescription
Provided there has been a known actionable nuisance for 20 years or more without complaints, then D gains prescriptive right to continue the nuisance ( Sturges V Bridgman); Timer only starts once the nuisance becomes actionable
Statutory authority
Permission granted in an act of parliament; this is a completed defence
Volenti
defendant can show that the claimant has taken active steps to encourage the nuisance
Moving to the nuisance
Courts will take into account the character of the area and establish whether the actions of the defendant are out or character for the area; Moving to the nuisance is not a defence meaning a newcomer can successfully bring in a nuisance claim
Remedies
Injunctions
Abatement
Damages
Injunctions
Prohibitive = prevents the person from doing something
Positive = require the defendant to do something to limit the expense of the nuisance
Abatement
Courts provide authority for the claimant to prevent or reduce the nuisance (Lemmon V Webb)