BUSN 5000E: Potential Outcomes and Causality

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/14

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

A set of vocabulary flashcards based on lecture notes covering causal inference, potential outcomes, and the results of the Tennessee STAR experiment.

Last updated 5:30 AM on 7/31/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

15 Terms

1
New cards

Tennessee STAR experiment

The Tennessee Student/Teacher Achievement Ratio (STAR) experiment was a large randomized experiment starting in the 1985–86 school year that assigned kindergartners and teachers to small, regular, or regular+aide class configurations.

2
New cards

Confounding

A situation where a variable ZZ affects both the treatment XX and the outcome YY, creating a spurious relationship through a backdoor path.

3
New cards

Backdoor path

A non-causal, spurious path in a directed acyclic graph (DAG) that connects the treatment to the outcome through a confounder.

4
New cards

Counterfactual

The notion of a 'road not taken,' representing the outcome that would have been observed for an individual under a treatment status different from the one actually experienced.

5
New cards

Potential Outcomes

The two possible states for an individual: y1iy_{1i} (the outcome if treated, Di=1D_i = 1) and y0iy_{0i} (the outcome if untreated, Di=0D_i = 0).

6
New cards

Switching Equation

The formula yi=(1Di)y0i+Diy1iy_i = (1 - D_i)y_{0i} + D_i y_{1i} (or yi=y0i+(y1iy0i)Diy_i = y_{0i} + (y_{1i} - y_{0i}) D_i), which defines the observed outcome based on treatment assignment.

7
New cards

Causal inference problem

Essentially a missing data problem where counterfactual potential outcomes are unobserved, making it impossible to see the individual-level treatment effect.

8
New cards

Average Treatment Effect (ATE)

The expected difference between the treated and untreated potential outcomes for the entire population, defined as ATE=E(y1iy0i)=E(y1i)E(y0i)ATE = E(y_{1i} - y_{0i}) = E(y_{1i}) - E(y_{0i}).

9
New cards

Selection Bias

The difference in average untreated potential outcomes between the treated and untreated groups, represented as E(y0iDi=1)E(y0iDi=0)E(y_{0i}|D_i = 1) - E(y_{0i}|D_i = 0).

10
New cards

Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT)

The average treatment effect specifically for those in the treatment group, defined as ATT=E(y1iy0iDi=1)ATT = E(y_{1i} - y_{0i}|D_i = 1).

11
New cards

Ignorable assignment mechanism

A condition achieved through randomization where treatment status is independent of potential outcomes, denoted as (y0i,y1i)Di(y_{0i}, y_{1i}) \perp \perp D_i.

12
New cards

Conditional Independence Assumption (CIA)

The claim that potential outcomes are independent of treatment assignment conditional on a set of observed variables xix_i, denoted as {y0i,y1i}Dixi\{y_{0i}, y_{1i}\} \perp \perp D_i | x_i.

13
New cards

Overlap

A requirement for estimating the ATE that ensures treated and untreated units are observed for every value of xix_i, meaning 0<P(Di=1xi)<10 < P(D_i = 1|x_i) < 1.

14
New cards

Strong Ignorability

A condition for identifying causal effects that occurs when both the Conditional Independence Assumption (CIA) and the overlap condition are met.

15
New cards

Covariate balance

The condition where the distributions of covariates are similar between treated and untreated units, indicating that treatment assignment was likely random.