1/53
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Homicide
there’s a dead body
1) murder OR
2) manslaughter
Murder
4 ways to commit:
intent to kill (premeditated killing; specific intent)
intent to inflict serious bodily harm (no specific intent to kill)
felony murder (a death occurs while committing a dangerous felony)
depraved heart murder (reckless disregard for human life)
dangerous underlying felonies for felony murder
BARRK
burglary
arson
rape
robbery
kidnapping
reckless disregard for human life
knew or should have known that death could occur and acted anyway
manslaughter
2 types:
voluntary manslaughter
involuntary manslaughter
voluntary manslaughter
adequate provocation
heat of passion
no time to cool off
example: you come home and find your spouse in bed with someone else
involuntary manslaughter
negligent conduct causing a death
hint: look for facts that no other people were present; if others were present, it’s probably recklessness/depraved heart murder
larceny
a specific intent crime that requires:
trespassory taking
carrying away
personal property of another
with intent to permanently deprive
example: continuing trespass
wrongful taking without permission
no intent to steal at the time of taking
can turn into larceny if you decide to keep it
burglary (common law)
specific intent crime that requires:
breaking and entering
dwelling of another
at nighttime
with intent to commit a felony inside
burglary: intent
intent must be present at the moment of the breaking and entering
felony does not have to be actually committed
robbery
specific intent crime that requires:
trespassory taking
carrying away
property of another
by force, intimidation, or fear
note: larceny merges into robbery
assault with attempt to commit a battery
specific intent crime
intent to commit a battery
intent to place another in imminent fear
words are NOT enough
larceny by trick
specific intent crime
obtain possession to property by false statement
use this as default crime before false pretense or embezzlement
false pretenses
specific intent crime
same as larceny by trick but obtain TITLE to property by false statement
embezzlement
specific intent crime that requires:
lawful possession of personal property
converted for own use
receiving stolen property
specific intent crime that requires:
physical possession of stolen property
knowledge it was stolen
intent to keep
forgery
specific intent crime that requires
fraudulent making of a false document
with legal significance
intended wrongful use
example: printing money
accomplice liability
specific intent crime that requires
specific intent to achieve the crime
aid or abet the completion of the crime
crimes accomplice is guilty of
accomplice is guilty of all underlying crimes completed
liable for the planned crime and any other foreseeable crimes that occur in the course of the criminal act
if the crime isn’t completed, accomplice is only guilty of accomplice liability
accessory before the fact
not present at the scene of crime
accessory after the fact
felony completed
knowledge of completed crime
aid to avoid arrest/conviction
note: not guilty of the underlying crime but guilty of a separate crime (eg obstruction of justice, harboring a fugitive)
general intent crimes
no specific intent required
the act itself is enough
battery
general intent crime
unlawful application of force
arson
general intent crime
malicious burning of the dwelling of another
malicious = reckless (knew or should have known that harm could occur)
common law: burning your own home is not arson
modern trend: will give you a statute or it will be obvious they are testing arson
rape (common law)
general intent crime that requires:
unlawful sexual intercourse
by a male with a female
without consent
kidnapping
general intent crime
unlawful restraint or a person’s freedom by force
inchoate crimes
attempt
conspiracy
solicitation
attempt
intent to commit the crime
substantial step
attempt - merger
merges into completed crime
cannot be guilty of both attempt and the underlying completed crime
attempt - withdrawal
cannot withdraw after a substantial step
common law conspiracy
two or more people
specific intent to commit crime
agreement
note: default rule
MPC conspiracy
AKA unilateral conspiracy
only one person has to agree (eg if there’s an undercover cop)
co-conspirator liability
a co-conspirator is liable for all crimes committed in furtherance of consipracy
conspiracy - merger
does NOT MERGE into the completed crime
guilty of both conspiracy and underlying crime
conspiracy - withdrawal
CANNOT withdraw from the conspiracy
CAN withdraw from other crimes committed in furtherance of the conspiracy by timely notice to co-conspirators
solicitation
encourage, urge, or incite another to commit a crime
solicitation - merger
MERGES into completed crime
cannot be guilty of both solicitation and the underlying completed crime
solicitation - withdrawal
CANNOT withdraw
insanity defense: m’naghten test
mental disease
cannot appreciate “nature and quality” of actions
cannot understand what you are doing is wrong
insanity defense MPC
defendant lacked “substantial capacity” to appreciate criminal conduct
note: the federal burden of proof for insanity is clear and convincing evidence
voluntary intoxication
voluntarily getting drunk/taking drugs
defense to specific intent crimes (FIAT)
involuntary intoxication
intoxication without knowledge/consent
defense to ALL crimes
mistake of law
mistakes about what the law forbids and what it permits
GENERAL RULE: ignorance of the law is no excuse
EXCEPTIONS:
1. reliance on high-level government interpretation
2. lack of notice
3. a mistake of law that goes to an element of specific intent
mistake of fact
strict liability crimes: NEVER a defense
general intent: defense only if the mistake is reasonable and goes to the criminal intent
specific intent: defense whether the mistake is reasonable or unreasonable
entrapment
law enforcement creates criminal activity
defendant not predisposed to commit crime (defendant has no prior experience or knowledge concerning the crime)
durress
reasonable belief of threat of great bodily harm
NEVER a defense to murder
self-defense
reasonable belief of imminent danger or bodily harm
return of the same level of force
deadly force only allowed for deadly force
defense of others
reasonable belief a third party is in imminent danger
return the same level of force
defense of property
reasonable force to defend property
never deadly force unless fear of being killed
jdx of the united states to criminalize and prosecute crimes
the U.S. has the power to criminalize and prosecute crimes that:
occur anywhere in the US
occur on planes and shops; or
are committed by US nationals abroad
jdx of states to criminalize and prosecute crimes
states can only punish crimes with some connection to the state
actus reus requirement
act in the world or failure to act when there’s a statutory duty, special relationship, defendant causes danger, or starting to rescue
voluntary
strict liability offenses
statutory/regulatory offenses & moral offenses
look for lack of mens rea language in a given statute