1/11
p168-70
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
CRITICISM of march of progress view (Young and Wilmott)
Oakley (1974)
Claim that family now symmetrical exaggerated
‘Helping’ in the house at least once a week could be taking the children for a walk once or making breakfast once, which isn’t convincing evidence of symmetry
Oakley (1974) - husband’s role in housework and childcare
15% of husbands had high participation in housework
25% of husbands had high participation in childcare, and of this only the ‘fun’ bits
Leaves mothers with no rewards of childcare and more time for housework
Couples defined the fathers role was defined as ‘taking an interest’
Boulton (1983) - responsibility taken for children
Claimed Y&W exaggerated their claims of a ‘march of progress’ as they looked at tasks instead of responsibilities.
Said that fathers helped with specific tasks while the mother was responsible for the child’s security and wellbeing.
Found that <20% of husbands played a major role in childcare.
Ferri and Smith 1996 - responsibility taken for children
Fathers did the childcare in less than 4% of families
Dex and Ward (2007) - responsibility taken for children
78% of fathers played with their children
<1% took the responsibility of caring for a sick child
Braun, Vincent and Ball - responsibility taken for children
3/70 families had a father as their main carer
Most fathers viewed caring for the children as placating their spouse instead of actually caring about the children
Ward & Hetherington (1993) - sex-typing of domestic tasks
Sex-typing of domestic tasks still strong
Wives 30x more likely to have been the last person to do the washing
Husbands 4x more likely to have been the last person to wash the car
Men only did routine ‘female’ tasks when their partners were unable to do them
Younger men - less of an assumption that women should do the housework
More likely to think they were doing less of the housework than their fair share
British Social Attitudes Survey (2013) - data to support idea of dual burden
Little idea of a ‘new man’ who does an equal share of the housework and childcare shown in data
Men do half hours of housework/caring even though women also working
Women not only doing as much housework and childcare as before, but also doing paid work
Average hours spent doing housework per week
Men: 8
Women: 13
Average hours spent caring for family members per week
Men: 10
Women: 23
60% of women felt division of labour unjust as doing more than fair share
Gender division of tasks (same pattern as 1994)
Men: small repairs around house
Women: laundry, caring, shopping, cleaning, cooking
ISSUES with BSA (2013) data
Allan (1985)
Doesn’t show qualitative differences in tasks such as intrinsic satisfaction, difficulty, discomfort and skill required
Women’s tasks less intrinsically satisfying
Hochschild (2013) - emotion work
Women required to take responsibility for other family members
E.g. ‘emotion work’ - emotions/feelings, sibling squabbles, keeping everyone happy, controlling their own emotions
Duncombe and Marsden (1995) - ‘triple shift’
Women do triple shift of house, paid and emotion work
Southerton (2011) - quality time
Mothers face greater difficulty in organising quality time due to:
24/7 society - time has become more fragmented and de-routinised
Flexible working patterns leading to lack of routines
Fragmented blocks of time meaning no clear time to dedicate as quality time.
Men have blocks of leisure time whereas women’s leisure time is punctuated by childcare
Women more likely to multitask
Being ‘pushed for time’ doesn’t show up in quantitative ways