Ap Gov Court Cases (NON-REQUIRED)

studied byStudied by 5 people
0.0(0)
get a hint
hint

 

Baker v. Carr (1962)

1 / 36

Tags and Description

A list of potentially helpful court cases for the AP Gov Exam

37 Terms

1

 

Baker v. Carr (1962)

Case Precedent: Ruled that the judicial branch of government can rule on matters of legislative apportionment. Established the principle of "one person, one vote."

New cards
2

 

Brown v. Board of Education I (1954)

Case Precedent: Ruled that racially segregated schools violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. 

New cards
3

 

Brown v. Board of Education II (1955)

Case Precedent: Supreme Court embraced in its first desegregation decision and urged localities to act on the new principles promptly and to move toward full compliance with them "with all deliberate speed."

New cards
4

 

Bush v. Gore (2000)

Case Precedent: Court ruled that manual recounts of presidential ballots in the 2000 election could not proceed because inconsistent evaluation standards in different counties violated the equal protection clause. 

New cards
5

 

Citizens United v. FEC (2010)

Case Precedent: Ruling that tossed out the corporate and union ban on making independent expenditures and financing electioneering communications. It gave corporations and unions the green light to spend unlimited sums on ads and other political tools, calling for the election or defeat of individual candidates.

New cards
6

 

Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857)

Case Precedent: Ruled that African-Americans were not citizens and therefore could not petition the Supreme Court.

New cards
7

 

Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)

Case Precedent: The Court used a two-pronged test to evaluate speech acts: speech can be prohibited if it is "directed at inciting or producing imminent lawless action" and it is "likely to incite or produce such action."

New cards
8

 

Buckley v. Valeo (1976)

Case Precedent: Campaign spending is a form of protected speech under the First Amendment, subject to restrictions on campaign contributions by individuals. 

New cards
9

 

DC v. Heller (2008)

Case Precedent: Court held that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess firearms for lawful use, such as self-defense, in the home 

New cards
10

 

Engel v. Vitale (1962)

Case Precedent: School sponsorship of religious activities violates the establishment clause. 

New cards
11

 

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)

Case Precedent: Guaranteed the right to an attorney for the poor or indigent.

New cards
12

 

Gitlow v. New York (1925)

Case Precedent: Established precedent for the doctrine of selective incorporation, thus extending most of the requirements of the Bill of Rights to the states. 

New cards
13

 

Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)

Case Precedent: Ruled that a state law criminalizing the use of contraceptives violated the right to marital privacy. 

New cards
14

 

Heart of Atlanta Motel v. US (1964)

Case Precedent: Case holding that the U.S. Congress could use the power granted to it by the Constitution's Commerce Clause to force private businesses to abide by the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

New cards
15

 

Korematsu v. US (1944)

Case Precedent: Upheld the constitutionality of the relocation of Japanese Americans as a wartime necessity. 

New cards
16

 

Lawrence v. Texas (2003)

Case Precedent: The Court held that a state statute making it a crime for two persons of the same sex to engage in certain intimate sexual conduct violates the Due Process Clause.

New cards
17

Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)

Case Precedent: Ruled that state aid to church-related schools must be clearly secular, the government's action must neither advance nor inhibit religion, and the government action must not foster an "excessive entanglement" between government and religion.

New cards
18

 

Mapp v. Ohio (1961)

Case Precedent: Ruled that all evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the Constitution is, by the Fourth Amendment, inadmissible in a state court.

New cards
19

 

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Case Precedent: Established the principle of judicial review. Strengthened the power of the judicial branch by giving the Supreme Court the authority to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional.

New cards
20

 

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

Case Precedent: Established supremacy of the US Constitution and federal laws over state laws.

New cards
21

 

McDonald v. Chicago (2010)

Case Precedent: Supreme court found that the right of an individual to "keep and bear arms" as protected under the Second Amendment is incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment against the states.

New cards
22

 

Miranda v. Arizona (1966)

Case Precedent: Ruled that the police must inform criminal suspects of their constitutional rights before questioning suspects after arrest.

New cards
23

 

New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985)

Case Precedent: 4th amendment protects against unreasonable searches, but schools can perform these searches; girl has drugs in her purse, school searches it and finds it, she tries to claim its unconstitutional, Supreme Court says search is reasonable because of reasonable suspicion and probable cause.

New cards
24

 

New York Times Co. v. US (1971)

Case Precedent: Bolstered the freedom of the press, establishing a "heavy presumption against prior restraint" even in cases involving national security.

New cards
25

 

Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)

Case Precedent: Court ruled that states must both recognize same-sex marriages from other states, and provide licenses within the state.

New cards
26

 

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

Case Precedent: Upheld Jim Crow segregation by approving "separate but equal" public facilities for African-Americans.

New cards
27

 

Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)

Case Precedent: Court ruled a Pennsylvania law that would have required a woman to notify her husband before getting an abortion was thrown out, but laws calling for parental consent and the imposition of a 24-hour waiting period were upheld. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an "undue burden" upon. women.

New cards
28

 

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)

Case Precedent: Ruled that race could be used as one factor among others in the competition for available places.

New cards
29

 

Roe v. Wade (1973)

Case Precedent: Ruled that the decision to obtain an abortion is protected by the right to privacy implied by the Bill of Rights.

New cards
30

 

Schenck v. US (1919)

Case Precedent: Ruled that free speech could be limited when it presents a "clear and present danger”.

New cards
31

 

Shaw v. Reno (1993)

Case Precedent: Court ruled that racial gerrymandering-invalidated the district because boundaries were neither contiguous nor compact and were drawn with the intent to discriminate using racial gerrymandering. The court ruled that any racial gerrymandering by the state required a compelling state interest.

New cards
32

 

Texas v. Johnson (1989)

Case Precedent: Ruled that flag burning is a form of symbolic speech protected by the 1st Amendment. 

New cards
33

 

Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community Schools (1969)

Case Precedent: Protected some forms of symbolic speech. Ruled that students do not " shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." 

New cards
34

 

US v. Lopez (1995)

Case Precedent: Congress may not use the commerce clause to make possession of a gun in a school zone a federal crime.

New cards
35

 

US v. Nixon (1974)

Case Precedent: Ruled that there is no constitutional guarantee of non-qualified executive privilege. 

New cards
36

 

West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette (1943)

Case Precedent: Court ruled that compelling public schoolchildren to salute the flag was unconstitutional. Justices argued that "[i]f there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein."

New cards
37

 

Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)

Case Precedent: Compelling Amish students to attend school past the eight grade violates the free exercise clause of the 1st Amendment. 

New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 11 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 49 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 17 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(2)
note Note
studied byStudied by 9 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 29 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 207 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(5)
note Note
studied byStudied by 10 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 9943 people
Updated ... ago
4.8 Stars(32)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard60 terms
studied byStudied by 27 people
Updated ... ago
4.7 Stars(7)
flashcards Flashcard23 terms
studied byStudied by 24 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard41 terms
studied byStudied by 10 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard63 terms
studied byStudied by 88 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard36 terms
studied byStudied by 3 people
Updated ... ago
4.5 Stars(2)
flashcards Flashcard43 terms
studied byStudied by 7 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard26 terms
studied byStudied by 1 person
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard126 terms
studied byStudied by 111 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(4)