1/39
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
The philosophical inquiry of the moral dimensions of human conduct
Ethics
Ethics focuses on:
Right versus wrong
Good versus bad
Duties and responsibilities
Justification of decisions
Ethics is not
• Personal preference
• Mere opinion
• Moral development
• Religious doctrine alone
• The law
Three characteristics of Ethics
Fundamental
Universal
Considers all affected parties
No higher standard exists for judging the issue
Fundamental
Participants believe there is a right or wrong answer
Universal
Welfare of everyone involved is considered
Considers all affected parties
Levels of ethical decision-making:
Micro Level
Meso Level
Macro Level
Individual patient-professional interactions
• Eg.: accurate information, patient autonomy, potential harm, professional responsibility
Micro Level
Institutional or organizational decisions
• Eg., fair allocation of limited resources
Meso Level
Professional, societal, or governmental policy decisions
• Eg., balancing individual needs and societal resources
Macro Level
Rules of conduct imposed by society on its members
Law
Rules of conduct or standards by which a particular group in society regulates its actions and sets standards for its members
professional ethics
Our ethical beliefs may on occasion command our ___
Eg., a prison pharmacist who refuses to dispense drugs to be used in legal executions
civil disobedience
Branch of moral philosophy that establishes the criteria for determining what is morally right and wrong
Normative Ethics
Based on their consequences, rather than on any intrinsic features
Consequentialist Theory
2 types of Consequentialist Theory
Beneficence
Nonmaleficence
Do that which promotes a good outcome
Beneficence
Do that which minimizes bad outcomes (more important)
Nonmaleficence
Look more to intrinsic qualities
Deontological (Duty-Driven) Theory
“Four pillars of biomedical ethics” by Beauchamp and Childress:
Respect for autonomy
Nonmaleficence
Beneficence
Justice
(Deantological) The right of the individual to self-rule or to decide on issues that primarily affect self
Respect for autonomy
(Consequentialist) Duty to do no harm
Nonmaleficence
(Consequentialist) Duty to promote good
Beneficence
Relate to fairness and tendering what is due, resource allocation, and providing that to which the individual is entitled
Justice
The physician’s (or any healthcare provider’s) duty is to the patient
Respecting the patient-professional relationship
Related to autonomy; the client has a right to be informed and to freely choose a course of action
Consent
Related to autonomy; individual client’s right to give or refuse consent relative to release of privileged information
Confidentiality
Related to autonomy; right of the individual to control their own affairs without interference from or knowledge of outside parties
Privacy
Duty to the welfare of the individual, particularly within religion-based deontological theories; dignity or sanctity of human life principles
Respect for persons
(Deontological) Obligation to truth telling or honesty
Veracity
(Deontological) Responsibility to be trustworthy and keep promises
Fidelity
Consideration of the other’s point of view
Duty of reciprocity
each party takes on certain responsibilities and gives up certain rights in order to achieve specific good outcomes
(consequentialist theory)
3 parts of Ethics analysis
I. Identification of relevant background information
II. Identification of relevant background information
III. Deliberation, through the use of moral intuition and application of ethical theory, on how to rank/balance the rules and principles pertinent to the case in order to resolve the ethical dilemma
3 parts under Identification of relevant background information
A. Data gathering
B. Consideration of the welfare of all affected parties
C. Respect for the cultural perspectives of these parties
• Details of the issue
• Who is directly involved
• Any conflict in factual understanding among the involved parties
Data gathering
• The healthcare provider
• The direct client
• Other indirect but individual clients (e.g., unborn children)
• Other health professionals (e.g., patient’s physicians)
• Other societal groups (e.g., other patients who might be harmed by an incompetent practitioner)
• Any higher power recognized by the health professional
Consideration of the welfare of all affected parties
• Religious affiliation
• Socioeconomic status
• Political affiliation
• Age category
• Racial or ethnic group
Respect for the cultural perspectives of these parties
• Nonmaleficence
• Beneficence
• Respecting the patient- professional relationship
• Respect for autonomy
• Consent
• Confidentiality
• Privacy
• Respect for persons
• Veracity
• Fidelity
• Justice
Identification and justification of the relevant moral rules and principles (action-guides) pertinent to the case