1/85
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Promissory Estoppel
doctrine which allows a recipient of a promise to enforce a contract in court
Requirements of a contract
Agreement, consideration, contractual capacity, legality
Agreement
offer and acceptance, objective standard
Consideration
legal value given in return for a promise
to do something, to perform, to refrain from something of legal right
Contractual Capacity
parties of a contract assumed to have this
unless intoxicated, mentally incompetent, or a minor
Legality
legal subject matter, does not accomplish an illegal goal or purpose
Express Contract
oral or written contract
Implied Contract
contract inferred from actions of the parties
Bilateral Contract
contract has exchange of promises, legal liability to perform
Unilateral Contract
Offer can be accepted without need for a return promise
Executed Contract
contract fully performed by both parties
Executory Contract
contract not fully performed by one party
Formal Contract
subject to additional requirements of law
Voidable
option to nullify contract by one of the parties
Disaffirm
cancel a contract
Void
not a real contract, not legally enforceable as a contract
Unenforceable
is a valid contract but not enforceable in court
Outputs contract
buyer agrees to purchase all that is produced
Requirements contract
seller agrees to sell all the buyer would need
Options Contract
promise to keep offer open until a specified date with consideration from the offeree
Rejection
statement or conduct showing rejection or refusal to accept by the offeree
Counteroffer
rejection and a new offer
Mirror Image Rule
The acceptance must mirror the offer
UCC 2-207
for goods, merchants can incorporate additional acceptance terms
Revoke
eliminate offerees ability to accept, effective once received
Irrevocable contracts
Can not be withdraw if
begun or prepared to perform
options contract
Acceptance of a Unilateral Contract
acceptance occurs when fully performed
Acceptance of a Bilateral Contract
acceptance occurs with a return promise
Mailbox rule
contract acceptance is effective on dispatch
Doctrine of Unforeseen Circumstances
allow all parties to agree to renegotiate
Liability Requirements of Promissory Estoppel
a promisor, a promisee who relied on promise, suffered harm, justice served by enforcement of the promise
Mutual Rescission
both parties agree to undo the contract
Accord and Satisfaction
dispute of amount owed
Release
legally giving up right to make a claim or sue
requires good faith, writing, and consideration
Restitution
return of merchandise by minors of a contract, if still in possession
Misrepresentation
minors may still disaffirm, even if they lied about their age
Necessaries
contractable for a minor, liable for goods/value received, still voidable
Ratification
accepting obligation not previously enforceable
Void contracts for mentally incompetent
previously adjudicated in court, removed capacity to contract
Voidable contracts for mentally incompetent
incompetent at time of contract but now lucid, not adjudicated
Fully enforceable contracts for mentally incompetent
Understood consequences of actions, lucid
Procedural Unconscionability
the process is wrong/immoral
Substantive Unconscionability
the subject matter is wrong/immoral
Exculpatory clause
relieves liability in the event of harm
Adhesion Contract
one party has superior amount of bargaining power, other party must agree
Statute of Fraud
certain contracts must be written to be enforceable and signed by opposing party
MYLEGG
Parol Evidence Rule
the court will exclude all prior negotiations that contradicts terms of a fully integrated contract
Exception to the Parol Evidence Rule
if there are subsequent modifications or presence of ambiguous terms
Course of Dealings
clarify ambiguous terms based on performance in previous contracts
Course of Performance
clarify ambiguous terms based on performance under this contract
Usage of Trade
clarify ambiguous terms based on interpretation of other businesses in the industry
Bilateral Mistake of Fact
both parties are mistaken
Unilateral mistake of fact
only one party is mistaken
Intentional Misrepresentations
misrepresentation occurred, intent to deceive, innocent party relied on the misrepresentation
innocent misrepresentation
did not intentionally lie, other party relied on a misstated fact
negligent misrepresentation
carelessly telling an untruth, other party relied on it
Puffing
seller exaggerates value/performance of a good
Caveat Emptor
buyer beware
Undue Influence excuse
parties have a relationship which caused undue influence on formation of a contract
Physical Duress excuse
threat of violence, property, or false imprisonment used to contract
Economic Duress excuse
wrongful behavior causing financial hardship to a party who had no other alternatives
Complete Performance
perform with no errors and in accordance with contract terms, no further obligation
Material Breach
failure to perform significant duty under the contract
no longer entitled to payment, other party not obligated to perform
Substantial Performance
performed in good faith but with deviation from immaterial terms of the contract
Conditions Precedent
conditions must occur before obligation to perform
Conditions Subsequent
must perform until condition is no longer met
Concurrent Conditions
both parties subject to conditions of the contract
Express Conditions
conditions stated in the contract
Implied Conditions
conditions not expressly stated in contract but inferred
Objective Conditions
conditions satisfied based on the beliefs of a reasonable person
Subjective Conditions
conditions satisfied based on opinion of one of the parties
Expectation Damages
Difference between expectation and state after the breach occurred
Reliance Damages
compensate plaintiff for expenses incurred
Restitution Damages
amount of value the defendant has received from the plaintiff
reformation
a court changes the contract in the case of fraud or mutual mistake
equitable remedy
Liquidated Damages
predetermined amount to be awarded if a breach occurs
Mitigation
the plaintiff is required to minimize their losses
Anticipatory Repudiation
inform other party of inability to perform according to the contract
objective impossibility
cases where it is impossible for the contract to be performed by anyone
intended beneficiary
a third party who benefits from a contract, CAN sue if a breach occurs
incidental beneficiary
a third party who benefits from a contract, can NOT sue if a breach occurs
Assignment
transferring rights or benefits under a contract to an assignee
Delegation
transferring of duties under a contract to another party
Novation
replacing the original contract with a new one
general damages
compensate for direct loss caused by breach
special damages
damages that are unforeseeable and require notice