1/45
highkey didnt understand that whole unit.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Perspective
particular attitude toward or way of regarding something
point of view
personal view
collective rights
belong to a group of people
affirm collective identity of groups
create a society where people of different identities belong
only Canada has them
protected in charter
made in 1982 with the constitution
who holds collective rights
Aboriginal peoples (First Nations, Metis, and Inuit)
Francophones (French speakers)
Anglophones (English Speakers)
why do these groups hold collective rights
recognize the first people of Canada and founding people of Canada
recognizes First Nations, Metis, and Inuit (FNMI) as Canada’s first people
legislation and policy affecting collective rights
historical and modern treaties
Canada’s constitution
Indian act
Manitoba act
Francophone
English used to be the language of business in Quebec
F.L.Q started
once it ended, Quebec voted in a new premier, which made bill 101, making French the official language
official bilingualism
two official languages
French
English
section 16 - 20
language rights apply in federal
in New Brunswick, citizens can deal with the provincial government in English or French
Minority language
one of the official languages spoken in a minority in a certain area
minority language education rights
section 23
states Francophone and Anglophone minority population of a sufficient size has access to publicly funded schools in their language
Francophone rights protected in Quebec
Charter gives citizens the right to use both French and English
Bill 101 promotes the use of French over English as much as possible
Bill 101
French over English as much as possible
Quebec law to protect and promote French in Quebec
French expresses their identity
French should be the language of government, work, education, and business
Bill 101 problems
it banned the use of English on commercial signs and restricted English schools
section 25
Any rights or freedoms that are recognized by the royal proclamation or land claims or treaties are now protected and a guaranteed right
Section 35
existing Aboriginal and treaty rights of Indigenous Peoples of Canada are recognized and affirmed
Indigenous rights under treaties or other laws are now protected under the Constitution
Legislation applied to indigenous rights
Historical and modern treaties
Canada's constitution
The Indian act
Manitoba act
Numbered treaties
Proclamation recognized the First nations right to land and made peaceful treaties with them
Big idea of the royal proclamation of 1763
affirmed first nation sovereignty over their land
Create peaceful treaties
Treaty
An agreement or arrangement by negotiation
Why were the treaties signed
Government wanted to build the railway to link British Colombia to the rest of Canada
To avoid wars, like those happening to the south between the United States and Aboriginal people fighting over territory
Provide security to future indigenous generations, in the face of economic and social upheaval from smallpox epidemics, eradication of the buffalo, end of the fur trade, and pressure of European settlements
To prevent the United States from expanding its boarders' northwards
Collective rights guaranteed by treaties
First nations agreed to share their lands and resources in peace
In return, Canada’s government agreed to the terms covering first nations’ health care, education, reserves, annuities, hunting, and fishing, and other matters
Annuities (annual payments) are mostly symbolic today. For example, members of treaty 8 receives $5 a year
Interpretations of treaties differed
Treaty 4
government: Want to have peace but wanted indigenous to be equal and be treated the same as everyone else
indigenous: They wanted their rights in the constitution to protect them and children and it will not be taken away in the future
Treaty 6
government: “Indian agent” - did not think indigenous people could not sustain themselves, they have honored the treaty
indigenous:They have their own way of governing themselves – did not think government was living up to their part
Treaty 7
government: Indigenous people were not civilized, made residential schools
indigenous: Taking away their culture
Treaty 8 or 10
government: Our charter, wanted a British, French, indigenous, and multiculturalism and to live in peace
indigenous: The indigenous always wanted this
Intent of the Indian act
Originally made to assimilate first nations
Considered ethnocentric, as it was created without consulting the first nations
Duncan Campbell Scott – main indigenous affairs person, was a key part in the indigenous assimilation
Content of Indian act
Indian agents – power to decide how the government would fulfill its treaty obligations -
Act defines who is registered as status Indians (only status Indians got first nation collective rights) - if you are not status, you will not get the benefits of collective rights
Dictated how first nations people conducted their affairs, such as band elections, although first nations had their own ways of governing themselves
Created residential schools
Restricted the first nations to travel freely (leave reserves)
Restricted political actions and voting
Restricted traditional language, dress and ceremonies
Indian act now
Act exists today but has been amended several times since 1876
Manitoba act
made Manitoba
gave Metis what they wanted, eg. land
made Manitoba a bilingual province
Metis
main agreement was the Manitoba Act
not subject to the Indian Act or the historical numbered treaties
self-governance on settlements - can make bylaws that apply only to settlement
settlements only exist in Alberta
have collective rights that are entrenched in the Constitution (Section 35)
Powley decision
clarified Métis rights and proved that the Métis are distinct from other Indigenous people under the Canadian Constitution
Denotation
the literal meaning of a word
Connotation
positive or negative emotions associated with the word
how the word makes you feel
Harvesting agreement
gives Metis the right/license to hunt and fish in certain areas
Metis timeline 1869 - 1870
The red river resistance caused the Manitoba act
The act made Manitoba a bilingual province, education rights for Catholics and Protestants, Metis land rights
Act said Metis would get more than 500000 hectares of land in addition to the farms along the red river
Metis timeline 1875 - 1879
Government gave a scrip (document that can be exchanged for land) to Metis instead of land in Manitoba
Choice to accept scrip or become "treaty Indians" under a numbered treaty
Metis timeline 1885
Northwest resistance was made to protect Metis land in Saskatchewan
Railway settlers started to move into western Canada, including Saskatchewan
Metis timeline 1896–1910
Metis settlers start to establish farms near St. Paul des Métis
Land provided by the catholic church
Metis did not have title to the land
Had to leave when settlement closed
Metis timeline - 1938
L’Association des Métis de l’Alberta et des Territoires du Nord-Ouest lobbied Alberta government for land for Metis
Alberta then passed the Métis Population Betterment Act, which made 12 temporary Metis settlements
First time Canada provided land for Metis
Metis timeline 1940 - 1960
Temporary settlement did not give Metis control of the land
Four settlements were proved unsuitable for farming, fishing, and hunting, they were shut down and given back to the Alberta government
Metis timeline 1982
Metis lobbies for Metis rights in Canada's constitution
When constitution was patriated, section 35 was included
Section 35 – recognizes Metis as a first nation with rights
Metis timeline 1990
Alberta government enacted legislation where Metis received Metis settlement as a permanent land base, where they can manage their own affairs
Legislation included:
Constitution of Alberta Amendment Act.
Métis Settlements Accord Implementation Act.
Métis Settlements Act.
Métis Settlements Land Protection Act.
Right for Metis to participate in development of oil and gas resources on their settlement land
Metis timeline 2003
Supreme court ruled that Metis can hunt and fish, as they are an indigenous under the constitution
These rights recognize the relationship to the land of the Metis, based in history and their inherited rights as first nations
Metis timeline 2004
Métis Settlements General Council and the Métis Nation of Alberta had an agreement with Alberta recognizing their hunting and fishing rights
Metis could hunt and fish food without a license
Metis timeline 2006
Metis in Manitoba launched a court case that would give them the land they never got in the Manitoba act
Winnipeg is on the land Metis would have gotten in the Manitoba Act
Metis timeline 2007
Alberta put a restriction on the right to fish and hunt without a license without Metis organization agreement