MATERIALIST THINKERS
Hobbes
Democritus (Atomism)
Anscombe
Dawkins
Daniel Dennet
Aristotle
Thomas Hobbes
Dismisses idea of immaterial substance
Everything is physical
Democritus
Everything made up of minute particles that are unalterable and indivisible
Epicurus
Denies idea of immortal soul due to atomism
Aquinas
Body and soul aren’t distinct entities
Soul gives the body it’s essence
“Man is not soul only, but something composed of soul and body”
Anscombe
Philosophy of pointing
When you ask why someone points, you reveal a mental process behind their action
Soul and body support each other
Dawkins
All physical matter, mind dies with the body
Concept of soul is illusion caused by ignorance
We are nothing more than biological beings trying to pass on DNA
Daniel Dennet
No place in brain for subjective thought
No such thing as consciousness, thinking or qualia
Aristotle
Empiricist = Rejects idea of non-physical soul, but soul as a form of the body is okay
Form of body = Essence of the body, defining characteristic
Soul is formal cause of humans (distinguishes it from other things)
Aristotle - 3 types of soul
Vegetative = Living things
Appetitive = Having desires
Intellectual = Thinking and reason
Aristotle = Wax seal
Wax seal is comprised of the wax and the stamp imprint
The imprint has no existence when separated from wax, but gives shape to the wax
Aristotle = F. Bacon
Bacon said that formal cause of metaphysical (the soul) is beyond empirical study
E.g. whiteness of snow = science explains how and where snow comes from, but not the form of whiteness
Dualists
Plato
Descartes
Plato
Body is a prison of the soul
Soul is indivisible, if it cannot be broken down it lasts forever
Theory of Forms explains that souls have always existed and always will
Plato - Phaedo (immortality of soul
3 key arguments
Argument of Opposites = Everything is and has an opposite
Theory of recollection = Learning is recollection, anamnesis
Argument from Affinity = Distinguishes immaterial, invisible and immortal from material, visible and mortal
Plato - Phaedo → Simmia and Cebes
Say soul is like the atonement of the instrument
Atonement (soul) only exists as long as the instrument does (body)
Soul is contingent on the body to exist
Plato - Tripartite soul
Charioteer= Reason, Horses = Emotion and appetite
Drive the soul, with reason keeping others in check
Plato - Meno
Anamnesis - Soul has learnt things in a previous life and “learning” of information is just recalling from the past life
Socrates gave the boy a question, eventually gets the right answer
Plato - Aristotle’s thoughts
Ockham’s razor = Aristotle’s theory of four causes explains world easier
Lack of empirical validity
Descartes substance dualism
Mental and physical substances make up humans
Essence of mental substance is thinking
Essence of physical substance is extension
Extended = Takes up space
What is Descartes first certainty
That you are a rational, thinking being
Descartes- Indivisibility Argument
P1. Physical substance is divisibly
P2. The mind is indivisible
P3. Leibniz’s law says things that are identical have the same properties
C. Mind cannot be identical to any physical things
Descartes- Issues with indivisibility argument
Mind can be divided into sections e.g. memory, perception, emotions.
Therefore, can be divided and has same properties as physical
Brain hemispheres being responsible for body
Descartes = Conceivability argument
P1. There is a clear idea of myself as a thinking, non-extended thing
P2. There is a clear idea of my body as a non-thinking, extended thing
C1. Opposing properties mean can conceive of the mind separate to and without body
P3. What can be conceived as separate could possibly separate
P4. What could possibly separate is non-identical
C2. Mind and body are non-identical
Descartes Conceivability argument for Dummies
If things are identical, they CANNOT be separate
3 sided shape is always a triangle, a triangle can only have 3 sides
You cannot conceive of triangle without 3 sides therefore it is not possible
Descartes - Masked Man fallacy
Assuming what you know about one aspect of something must be true for all aspects of something.
P1. I know who my father is
P2. I do not know who the masked man is
P3. Therefore, the masked man is not my father
ATTACKS INFERENCE MADE BY IDESCARTES IN CONCEIVABILITY ARGUMENT
Interaction in the brain
Some argue its hard for non-physical to have affect on physical (Ryle + ghost in the machine)
Descartes say they interact through pineal gland
Ryle
Ghost in the machine
Category mistake
Ryle - Category Error
Descartes makes a mistake by trying to categorise everything, he assumes there is more than can be seen
Linguistic error that forces categories
Ryle - Example of category error
University
Taken on tour of oxford and visit the colleges and the testing halls and different areas and asking where the university is
Mistake is thinking that university is in the category of building, not collection of buildings
DESCARTES ASSUMES THAT THE MIND AND SOUL ARE DIFFERENT CATEGORIES OF THE BODY, BUT THEY ARE FEATURES
Ryle - Brittleness of glass
Brittleness = Disposition of glass to smash on impact
Where is the brittleness of the glass, does it have extension, can it be divided?
Answers are obvious and lead to conclusion that brittleness of the glass is non-physical, but that is not necessarily true
Ryle argues that Descartes arguments shouldn’t lead to conclusion that mind is a non-physical thing.
Ryle - Ghost in the machine
Something immaterial can’t have an effect on something physical
ARGUES WTIH INDIVISIBILITY ARGUMENT
Avicenna - Flying man
if a man were suspended and blindfolded, he would still be aware of his mind
Body and mind co-exist but as distinct entities