1/18
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
MSM
proposed by atkinson and shiffrin , the model suggests memory of three distinct stores ( sensory register / short term memory / long term memory )
rehearsal
the process of repeating information to transfer from STM to LTM
recency effect
tendency to recall the last items of the list ( due to short term memory presence )
primacy effect
tendency to recall the first items on the list - attributed to LTM encoding
serial position effect
the pattern of better recall for items at the beginning and end of the list
glanzer and cunitz 1966 aim
to investiagte the serial position effect with and without interference from a filler activity
glanzer and cunitz 1966 sample
46 army enlisted men
glanzer and cunitz 1966 procedure
The study used a repeated measures design. Participants were given 3 five-word practice lists to learn the procedure.
Then they were shown fifteen 15-word lists (common one-syllable words), one word at a time, with a 2-second interval.
After each list, either a “#” (signal for immediate recall) or a number (signal to start counting) appeared.
Immediate recall: participants wrote down words right after the list.
Delayed recall: participants counted for either 10 or 30 seconds before recall.
glanzer and cunitz 1966 results
immediate recall showed bothprimacy and recency effect / 10 seond delay reduced the recency effect / 30 second delay eliminated recency effect completely
glanzer and cunitz 1966 conclusion
the study supports the idea off separate stores for STM and LTM primacy , early items stored in LTM and recent items in STM recency
glanzer and cunitz 1966 strenghts
high internal validity / use of repeated measures design reduce the partacipant variability
glanzer and cunitz 1966 limitations
low ecological validity / low genearalizability
HM (Milner, 1966) aim
To investigate the role of the hippocampus in memory formation
HM milner 1966 sample
HM
HM milner 1966 procedure
HM underwent surgery to remove parts of his medial temporal lobes, including the hippocampus, to control seizures.
After surgery, Milner conducted interviews, IQ tests, direct behavioral observation, and cognitive testing (e.g., mirror-drawing).
Longitudinal case study with triangulation over many years.
HM milner 1966 results
HM had intact short-term memory, but was unable to form new long-term memories.
He could learn motor skills (e.g., mirror-drawing) but had no conscious recollection of learning them.
HM milner 1966 conclusion
HM’s case demonstrates that the hippocampus plays a crucial role in converting STM to LTM.
It supports the separation of memory stores in the MSM.
HM study strnghts
high ecological validity / longitudinal and triangulation method gives in depth and valuable data
HM study limitations
low generalizability / ethical concern ( long term observation of a cognitively impaired individual )