1/90
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
theories of religion 1
.
substantive definition of religion
focus on the content or substance of religious belief (such as belief in god)
Weber defines religion as belief in a superior or supernatural power that is above nature and can’t be explained scientifically
functional definition of religion
defines religion in terms of the social or psychological functions it performs for individuals or society
durkheim defines religion in terms of the contribution it makes to social integration
constructionist definition of religion
argue that it is not possible to produce a single universal definition of religion
durkeim view on religion
sacred and profane
totemism
collective conscience
cognitive functions of religion
the sacred and profane
key feature of religion for durkeim is the distinction between the sacred and profane
the sacred are things set apart and forbidden
the profane are things that have no special significance (ordinary)
Durkheim believes that sacred things are symbols representing something of great power and he believes that this is society
and when people worship sacred things they’re worshiping society itself
totemism
durkeim used studies of the arunta (Australian tribe with a clan system)
Arunta clans consist of people who come together to perform rituals involving worship of a sacred totem
the totemic rituals reinforce the groups solidarity and sense of belonging
durkiem believes that when they worship their totem they’re actually worshiping society
the collective conscience
durkiem believed that the sacred symbols represent society’s collective conscience
the collective conscience is the shared norms, values, beliefs and knowledge that makes social life between individuals possible- without these society would disintegrate
durkeim believes that regular shared religious rituals reinforce the collective consciousness
religion makes us feel apart of something greater than ourselves
Criticisms of durkeim
worsley notes that there is no sharp division between the sacred and the propane
durkeims theory is hard to apply to large scale societies where there are multiple religious communities
psychological functions of religion
Malinowski agrees with durkeim that religion promotes solidarity but by performing psychological functions for individuals, helping them cope with emotional stress
for example in times of life crises like birth or puberty, religion helps to minimise disruption
parsons and religion
parsons sees religion as helping individuals to cope with unforeseen events and uncontrollable outcomes
argues that religion also creates and legitimates society’s central values and it is the primary source of meaning
evaluation of functionalism
it emphasises the social nature of religion and the positive functions it performs but neglects the negative aspects like oppression of women
ignores religion as source of division and cinflict
Marxist theories of religion
.
religion as ideology
Marx believes that ideology is a belief system that distorts people’s perception of reality in ways that serve the interests of the ruling class
marx believed that religion operates as an ideological weapon used by the ruling class to justify the suffering of the poor as soemthing inevitable
religion misleads the poor to believe that they will be favoured in the afterlife because of their suffering
religion and alienation
Marx sees religion as the product of alienation
working class are alienated compared to upper class so the exploited turn to religion as a form of comfort (creates false class consciousness)
religion also acts as an opium to dull the pain of the exploited but it masks the pain and doesn’t treat it
evaluation of Marxist view on religion
Marx ignores the positive aspects of religion and focuses on the negative
middle class are regular church goers
feminist theories of religion
see it as patriarchal
based on male domination
evidence of patriarchy
religious organisations are mainly dominated by men. E.g. in some religions women aren’t allowed to be priests. (ARMSTRONG)
religious laws may give women fewer rights than men. E.g. access to divorce, how many people they marry, dress codes.
criticisms of feminism
Armstrong argues that women haven’t always been segregated from religion. In early religions they were often placed at the centre of religion. E.g. fertility cults
religion and social change 2
.
religion as a conservative force
prevents social change
preserved traditional values and beliefs
religions beliefs
most religions have traditional conservative beliefs about moral issues
most religions uphold “family values” and often favour a traditional patriarchal domestic division of labour
religions functions
religion and consensus- functionalists see religion as a conservative force as it functions to maintain social stability
religion and capitalism- Marx sees religion as a conservative ideology that prevents social change
religion and patriarchy- feminists see religion as a conservative force as it acts as an ideology that legitimates patriarchal power
how has religion seen to create capitalism?
by disguising exploitation and inequality, it creates false class consciousness in the working class
Weber and religion as a force for change
argued that the religious beliefs of Calvinism helped to bring about major social change
notes that many past societies had capitalism in the sense of greed for wealth. However modern capitalism is unique because it is based on pursuit of profit for its own sake rather than for consumption
Calvinist beliefs
predestination- god has predetermined which sounds would be saved and which wouldn’t
divine transcendence- god was far above and beyond this world
evaluation of Weber and religion as a force for change
Marx disagrees as he saw economic or material factors as the driving for social change whereas Weber argues that material factors alone are not enough to bring about capitalism
Weber has been criticised as capitalism didn’t develop in every country where there were calvinists
religion and social protest
Steve Bruce compares two protests that have tried to change society
the American civil rights moment
Bruce uses this as an example of religiously motivated social change
started with rosa parks
ended with segregation outlawed
Bruce argues that the law was changed due to the black clergys christian values of equality
Bruce sees religion as bringing about change
the new Christian right
aim was to take America “back to god” and make abortion, homosexuality and divorce illegal
believes strongly in the traditional family and traditional gender roles
Bruce found that it was unsuccessful due to three reasons: campaigners found it very difficult to corporate with other religions, lacks widespread support
Bruce describes this movement as a failed movement for change
what is liberation theology?
a movement that emerged within the Catholic Church with a strong commitment to the poor and opposition to military dictatorship
Marxism, religion and change
.
Bloch: the principle of hope
sees religion as having a dual character
believes religion is an expression of “the principle of hope”- the perfect world
it can get people to look for improvement in the world
religious beliefs may therefore create a vision of a better world
gramsci: religion and hegemony
used the term hegemony to refer to the way that the ruling class use ideas such as religion to maintain control
by hegemony he means ideological domination of society
however hegemony is never guaranteed- it is always possible for the working class to develop an alternative vision of how society should be organised
secularisation 3
.
secularisation in Britain
1850- 40% or more of adult population attended church, which is much higher then today
this change has led to: a decline in amount of people going to church, fewer church weddings, greater diversity
Wilson argued that western societies had been undergoing a long term process of secularisation (e.g. church attendance had fallen from 40% to 10-15% in the 1960)
church attendance today in Britain
trends Wilson identified had continued
2015- 5% of adults attended, meaning attendance had halved since 1960
1970- 60% of British weddings in church, 20%- only 30%
religious institutions today
have declined
e.g. churches used to provide education but now is provided by schools
explanations of secularisation
decline in religious thinking and beliefs
decline in religious practice
decline of power and influence of religious institutions
decline in religious thinking and belief
the church has less impact today on people’s lives
numbers of anglicans almost halved between 1983 and 2014
decline in religious practice
5% of the population attend church on Sundays- 2015
many church buildings are dilapidated
decline of power and influence of religious institutions
the state has taken over many functions that church used to perform
the church has little influence over social policies
weber and rationalism
believed that decline in religious beliefs is because people have become reliant on technology rather than religion
moved away from super natural and more towards science or tech (rationalism)
social and cultural diversity
move from pre industrial to industrial society brings about the decline of community, which contributes to the decline of religion
wilson argues that in pre industrial communities, shared values were expressed through collective religious rituals
however when religion lost its basis in stable local communities, it lost its vitality
structural differentiation
theory by parsons
argues that the family has lost some of its functions due to the creation of specialised institutions being created
two major impacts on religion: disengagement- people become less interested in religion, privatisation- religion becomes a private matter
religion, renewal and choice 4
.
davie- from obligation to consumption
religion has become a choice
in the past religion would “oblige” people to go to church
this is no longer the case- religion is no longer inherited or imposed but personal choice
what is vicarious religion?
the idea that religion is practiced by an active majority on behalf of the great minority, who then experience religion at second hand
spiritual shopping
hervieu leger continues the idea of personal choice and decline in obligation
traditional institutional religion has declined but religion itself has not disappeared
people now have the choice as consumers of religion- spiritual shoppers
religion is now individualised- meaning we can develop our own beliefs that fit with our lives and interests
postmodern religion
lyon agrees with davie that believing without belonging is increasingly popular
he argued that traditional religion is giving way to a variety of new religious forms
Hellen distinguishes between two types of internet activity: religion online- where religious organisations use the internet to address members and online religion- a form of communication that allows individuals to create relationships and a sense of community
new age
a range of spiritual or religious practices and beliefs which rapidly grew in western society during the early 1970s
new age beliefs and practices have been called “self spirituality” because their key idea is individualism: idea that every individual is free to decide what is true for them
contrast between religion and spirituality
religion
life as duty
self sacrifice
conforming with external authority
spirituality
life as discovery
personal development
connecting with your inner self
weaknesses of new age
weak commitment- bruce found that although many people meditated, are into astrology etc, serious commitment to the new age was very rare
structural weakness- new age spiritually causes secularisation itself because it’s subjective and individualistic
existential security theory
Norris and inglehart argue that the reason for variations in religiosity between societies is not different degrees of religious choice but different degrees of existential security
the idea that religion provides safety
societies where people feel secure have less demand for religion (rich) but poor have less security so have high demand for religion
what is the religious market theory?
stark and bainbridge
see the secularisation theory as Eurocentric
religious market theory is based on: people are naturally religious and religion meets human needs- therefore demand for religion is consistent, and it is human nature to seek rewards and avoid costs
religion in a global context 5
.
religious fundamentalism
the demand for a strict adherence to orthodox theological doctrines, usually understood as a reaction to modernist theology
fundamentalists appeal to tradition and often look back to a supposed golden age in the past
7 characteristics of fundamentalism
authoritative sacred text- every word in the bible is true
“us and them” mentality- fundamentalists separate themselves from the rest of the world and refuse to compromise
aggressive reaction- aim to draw attention to the threat of their beliefs
use of modern technology
patriarchy- favour it
prophecy
conspiracy theories- attracted to them
what is cosmopolitanism?
giddens
a way of thinking that embraces modernity and is in keeping with todays globalising world
tolerant of the views of others and open to new ideas
ones lifestyle is seen as a personal choice rather than something prescribed by an external religious
how does India contradict the idea of secularisation?
globalisation has created a huge, scientifically educated middle class in India
the secularisation theory predicts that they will be first to abandon religion
but majority believe in supernatural
only 5% said that their religiosity has declined in the last 5 years and 30% said they became more religious
religion and development (Pentecostalism)
form of Christianity
emphasises the work of the Holy Spirit and the direct experience of the presence of god by the believe
believer that faith must be powerfully experiment
organisations, movements and members 6
.
types of religious organisations
churches- large, millions of members, aims to include the whole of society
sects- small, exclusive groups, hostile to wider society, draw their members from the poor and oppressed
denominations- membership less exclusive then sect but don’t appeal to the whole of society, accept society’s values, minor restrictions to members but not as demanding as sects
cults- highly individualistic, small grouping around shared interests, tolerant of other organisations, don’t demand strong commitment
reasons for the growth of religious denominations
marginality- Weber says that sects are popular in groups who are marginal to society and sects offer a solution to their oppression by offering them a religious explanation of their disadvantage
relative deprivation- refers to the subjective sense of being deprived which means that it is possible for privileged people to feel deprived compared to others. M/c people may feel spiritually deprived so they turn to sects as a sense of community
social change- wilson argues that periods of rapid change disrupt norms and values so this creates uncertainty meaning they may turn to sects as a solution
why are some sects short lived?
the second generation who are born into the sect lack commitment
death of a charismatic leader
gender differences in religiosity
women more likely to attend church regularly then men
more women then men say they have a religion
more women say religion is important to them then men
more women describe themselves as “spiritual”
reasons for gender differences
risk, socialisation and roles
paid work
women and the new age
risk, socialisation and roles
miller and Hoffman
by not being religious, people are risking that religion might be right and they will go to hell
men are more risk taking then men so they are less likely to be religious
women are more religious as they are socialised to be more passive, obedient and caring and these qualities are valued by most religions so women are more attracted to religion
women’s gender roles mean they are more likely to work part time so have my time to participate in religious activities
paid work
Bruce argues that women’s religiosity is a result of their lower levels of involvement in paid work
he links this to secularisation processes such as rationalism
this has gradually driven religion out of the male denominated sphere of work and into the private sphere of family- which involved women
women and the new age
as women are associated with a healing role they more be more attracted then men to new age movements and ideas
this is because such movements involve cults of healing which gives women a higher status and sense of self worth
Ethnic differences in religiosity
in london, black people were twice as likely to attend church then white
Muslims, hindus and black Christian’s are more likely to see their religion as important then white Christian’s and attend church every week
reasons for ethnic differences
cultural defence
cultural transition
cultural defence
bird says that religion among minorities can be a basis of solidarity (a means of preserving one’s culture and language) and a way of coping with oppression in society
black christians may find white churches as not actively welcoming which leads them to joining black led churches
cultural transition
religion can also be a means of easing the transition into a new culture by providing support and a sense of community for minority groups in their new environment
age differences in religiosity
the older the person is the more likely they are to attend religious services
however one expecting is that under 15s are generally more likely to go to church than those in most of the age groups above them
this is because they have less choice and are made to by parents
reasons for age differences
the ageing effect- people turn to religion when they get older. As we approach death, we “naturally” become more spiritual
the period effect- people born during a particular period may be more or less likely to be religious because of the particular events they lived through
ideology and science 7
.
the impact of science
improving medical care
improving technology
offers a “bible” to the whole of society
can enjoy entertainment
makes life easier
increase efficiency
open belief systems
popper believed science to be an open belief system where every scientist is open to scrutiny, criticism and testing by others
CUDOS norms
Merton- science can only thrive as a major social institution if it receives support from other institutions and norms
communism- scientific knowledge is not private property
universalism- the truth or falsity of scientific knowledge is judged by universal, objective criteria
disinterestedness- means being committed to discovering knowledge for its own sake
organised scepticism- no knowledge, claim is regarded as “sacred”, every idea is open to questioning and criticism
closed belief system
religion has special, perfect knowledge of the absolute truth and is not open to criticism
witch craft among the azande
the azande believe that natural events have natural causes
e.g. if you step on a snake it will bite you
do not believe that this is down to coincidence, it is witchcraft
self sustaining beliefs
polanyi argues that all belief systems have three devices to sustain themselves in the face of apparently contradictory evidence:
circulatory- each idea in the system is explained in terms of another idea within the system
subsidiary system
denial of legitimacy to rivals- belief systems reject alternative worldviews by refusing to grant any LEGO to their basic assumptions
science as a closed system
khun believes mature science is based on a set of shared assumptions called a paradigm
the paradigm tells scientist what reality is like, what problems to study, what methods and equipment to use
those who do so successfully are rewarded with bigger research grants
a successful career depends on working within the paradigm
therefore any scientist who challenged the fundamental assumptions of the paradigm are likely to be ridiculed
the sociology of scientific knowledge
rather than scientific knowledge being the absolute truth, it is created by social groups using the resources available to them
social construct
(Marxist) ruling class ideology includes ideas and beliefs such as
equality will never work out as it goes against “human nature”
victim blaming ideas about poverty- “the poor are dumb”
racist ideas about inferiority of ethnic minorities, which can divide black and white workers
the ideology of nationalism
nationalism claims:
nations are real, distinctive communities each with its own unique characteristics and a long share history
every nation should be self governing
Anderson- a nation is only an “imagined community”, although we identify with it we will never know most of its other members
functionalism: nationalism as civil religion
nationalism is like a secular civil religion
it integrates individuals into larger social and political units by making them feel part of something greater than themselves
gellner: nationalism and modernity
sees nationalism as false class consciousness
says it is a very modern phenomenon
believed pre industrial societies were not held together by nationalism but by gave to face relationships in small scale communities
Karl mannheim: ideology and utopia
Mannheims two types of belief system:
ideological thought- justifies keeping things as they are. Reflects the position and interests of privileged groups
utopian thought- justifies social change, it reflects the position and interests of the underprivileged and offers a vision of how society could be organised differently
groups of intellectuals who attach themselves to particular classes create worldviews
these world views only give a partial view of reality as they only represent the interests of particular groups and not society as a whole
feminism and ideology
marks- ideas from science have been used to justify excluding women from education
19th century doctors, scientists and educationalists expressing the view that educating females would lead to the creation of a new race of puny unfeminine women