Section 4

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/9

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

10 Terms

1
New cards

What’s significant about all valence orbitals of noble gases being filled?

  • maximized spin exchange stabilization energy (energy gained when e- with opposite spins are paired within same orbital)

  • due to stable e- configuration, noble gases are inert + don’t readily react with other elements

2
New cards

Many properties of elements depend upon?

Their valence shell e- configuraiton.

3
New cards

What is the 1st ionization energy?

  • energy required to remove the outer e- (highest energy) from an atom in the gas phase

  • X(g) + energy(light) X+(g) + e-

  • ∆E = Eproducts - Ereactants

    • energy provided to reactants to eject an e-

4
New cards

What do ionization energies give direct measurements of?

Valence e- energies.

5
New cards

What are the 3 trends of ionization energy?

  1. across a row (L to R): 1st IE increases

    1. net (+) charge experienced by valence e- is due to Zeff increasing (more protons)

    2. screening by e- in same shell less than core e-

      1. valence e- don’t shield each other as effectively as core e- do, so increasing the (+) charge of nucleus more strongly is felt by the valence e-, making them being held more tightly

  2. down a group: 1st IE decreases

    1. principle QN increases E of orbital increases (e- in higher orbitals easier to remove than in lower orbitals)

      1. # core e- increases down the group more screening + less Zeff

  3. ionization potential drops s2 s2p + s2p3 s2p4

    1. s2 s2p

      1. adding 1st p-e- leads to drop in IE since p-orbitals are higher in energy + easier to remove than s-orbitals

    2. s2p3 s2p4

      1. p-orbitals are half-filled in s2p3 (stable due to symmetrical distribution + minimized e- repulsion)

      2. but adding a 4th e- in s2p4 forces pairing within a p-orbital, increasing e- repulsion + lowering IE

<ol><li><p>across a row (L to R): 1st IE increases</p><ol><li><p>net (+) charge experienced by valence e<sup>-</sup> is due to Z<sub>eff</sub> increasing (more protons)</p></li><li><p>screening by e<sup>-</sup> in same shell less than core e<sup>-</sup></p><ol><li><p>valence e<sup>-</sup> don’t shield each other as effectively as core e<sup>- </sup>do, so increasing the (+) charge of nucleus more strongly is felt by the valence e<sup>-</sup>, making them being held more tightly</p></li></ol></li></ol></li><li><p>down a group: 1st IE decreases</p><ol><li><p>principle QN increases <span data-name="arrow_right" data-type="emoji">➡</span> E of orbital increases (e<sup>-</sup> in higher orbitals easier to remove than in lower orbitals)</p><ol><li><p># core e<sup>-</sup> increases down the group <span data-name="arrow_right" data-type="emoji">➡</span> more screening + less Z<sub>eff</sub></p></li></ol></li></ol></li><li><p>ionization potential drops s<sup>2</sup> <span data-name="arrow_right" data-type="emoji">➡</span> s<sup>2</sup>p + s<sup>2</sup>p<sup>3</sup> <span data-name="arrow_right" data-type="emoji">➡</span> s<sup>2</sup>p<sup>4</sup></p><ol><li><p>s<sup>2</sup> <span data-name="arrow_right" data-type="emoji">➡</span> s<sup>2</sup>p</p><ol><li><p>adding 1st p-e<sup>-</sup> leads to drop in IE since p-orbitals are higher in energy + easier to remove than s-orbitals</p></li></ol></li><li><p>s<sup>2</sup>p<sup>3</sup> <span data-name="arrow_right" data-type="emoji">➡</span> s<sup>2</sup>p<sup>4</sup></p><ol><li><p>p-orbitals are half-filled in s<sup>2</sup>p<sup>3</sup> (stable due to symmetrical distribution + minimized e<sup>-</sup> repulsion)</p></li><li><p>but adding a 4th e<sup>-</sup> in s<sup>2</sup>p<sup>4</sup> forces pairing within a p-orbital, increasing e<sup>-</sup> repulsion + lowering IE</p></li></ol></li></ol></li></ol><p></p>
6
New cards

What is atomic radii + 3 types of it?

  • distance from nucleus of an atom to the outermost e- shell: size

  • types

    • single bond (covalent): measure distance between nucleii (single bond) + divide by 2

    • van der Waals: outer e- in one atom is weakly attracted to another atom’s nucleus

      • ½ distance between nucleii

    • ionic radii: ionic solids after gaining or losing e- compared to neutral atom

      • measure distance between nucleii + extrapolate to neutral atomic radii

7
New cards

What are the 2 trends of atomic radii?

  1. atomic radius increases down a group

    1. principle QN increases energy of orbital increases + # core e- increases

    2. more shells are being added

  2. atomic radius generally decreases across a row (L to R)

    1. # protons + # core e- increase left to right

      1. Zeff increases left to right (more protons)

      2. atom size decreases since e- are being pulled in more

<ol><li><p>atomic radius increases down a group</p><ol><li><p>principle QN increases <span data-name="arrow_right" data-type="emoji">➡</span> energy of orbital increases + # core e<sup>-</sup> increases</p></li><li><p>more shells are being added</p></li></ol></li><li><p>atomic radius generally decreases across a row (L to R)</p><ol><li><p># protons + # core e<sup>-</sup> increase left to right</p><ol><li><p>Z<sub>eff</sub> increases left to right (more protons)</p></li><li><p>atom size decreases since e<sup>-</sup> are being pulled in more</p></li></ol></li></ol></li></ol><p></p>
8
New cards

What is the order of shielding ability for s, p, d + f-orbitals?

  • s > p > d > f

    • e- in f-orbitals are less effective at screening nuclear charge than e- in s + p-orbitals

    • d-orbitals: requires 10 e- to fill orbitals + 10 protons in nucleus

      • ex. between Ca + Ga the 3d orbitals are filled, but d-e- don’t shield nuclear charge effectively

        • thus Ga has a smaller atomic radius than Al even though Al is above it in period table (d-orbital contraction)

9
New cards

What is electronegativity?

Atom’s relative ability to attract e- in interactions with other atoms, solids, metals, molecules, covalent/ionic bonding.

10
New cards

What are the 2 trends for electronegativity?

  1. EN increases L to R (along with Zeff)

  2. EN decreases down a group (due to screening)