1/23
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Bowsher v. Synar (1986)
o Graham-Rudman-Hollings Act is unconstitutional because the comptroller general is a legislative officer that cannot possess Executive authority
o Comptroller general is a legislative officer who cannot have executive authority
Morrison v. Olson (1988)
Independent Counsel Act is constitutional because inferior officers do not need to follow the Appointment Clause
Myers v. United States (1926)
Removal of Myers by President is valid. Statute granting removal authority to Congress is constitutional
Humphrey’s Executor v. United States (1935)
Humphrey’s removal by FDR is invalid. FTC act providing for specific removal provisions is constitutional
Clinton v. City of New York (1998)
The Presidential Line Item Veto Act is unconstitutional because it violets the Presentiment Clause of the Constitution
United States v. Nixon (1974)
Subpoena is valid because the President does not enjoy Executive Privilege to withhold evidence from a criminal investigation
Clinton v. Jones (1997)
Jones’ lawsuit is valid and may proceed because the President does not possess immunity over unofficial conduct not related to national security
Trump v. United States (2024)
Part of the indictment is dismissed because presidents enjoy absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for official actions
Martin v Hunter’s Lessee (1816)
Appellate jurisdiction of the SCOTUS extends to the review of state court decisions that interpret federal law
Cohens v. Virginia (1821)
Conviction is upheld because state law banning lottery tickets is valid
Court gains appellate jurisdiction and judicial review authority over state law
Eakin v. Raub (1825)
Gibson’s Dissent: Framers of the Constitution made clear that federal government works through cooperation of branches, Oath to support the Constitution taken by all government officials, and Supremacy Clause of the Constitution is in Article 6
Ex parte McCardle (1869)
o McCardle’s petition for Habeas Corpus is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction
o The SCOTUS appellate jurisdiction is governed by Congress
Ashwander v. TVA (1936)
Brandeis argued that the Court should not have addressed the constitutional questions involved in the case, because Ashwander had not suffered an injury sufficient to bring the suit.
Marbury v. Madison (1803)
Marbury’s claim for a writ of mandamus is denied because the Supreme Court does not possess original jurisdiction
Powell v. McCormack (1969)
Powell can obtain his seat because Congress does not have authority to exclude members who meet Constitutional requirements for office
US Term Limits v. Thornton (1995)
Thornton is allowed to run for reelection because states do not have the authority to change qualifications for congressional office
Gravel v. United States (1972)
Grand jury subpoena is quashed because Speech and Debate Clause extends to congressional aides
Watkins v. United States (1957)
Conviction for contempt of Congress is overturned because Congress did not provide information connecting relevance of investigation to legitimate legislative duty
Barenblatt v. United States (1959)
Barenblatt’s contempt of Congress conviction is upheld because Committee provided proper information about the link between investigation and legislative activity
Trump v. Mazars (2020)
Congressional subpoena request is denied and cases sent back to District Court for new trial
Gibbons v. Ogden
The federal permit supersedes state law because Congress possesses authority over interstate commerce and navigation is considered commerce
U.S. v. E.C. Knight Co
Federal action to prevent monopoly is invalid because manufacturing is not part of interstate commerce
Stafford v. Wallace
Congressional statute regulating the meatpacking industry is constitutional because stockyards are part of the stream of commerce
Schechter Poultry Corp v. United States
National Industrial Recovery Act is declared unconstitutional because Congress cannot delegate lawmaking authority to the Executive. Workplace and labor regulations are local/intrastate, not interstate.