Week 7: Aggression

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/71

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

72 Terms

1
New cards

What is the definition of aggression according to Scherer et al. (1975)?

Behaviour intended to harm another of the same species.

2
New cards

According to Bandura (1973), how is aggression operationalised?

As behaviour resulting in personal injury or destruction of property.

3
New cards

What are methods of operationalising aggression?

  • Analogues of behaviour, such as punching a doll (Bandura et al. 1963).

  • Signal of intention, e.g. body language

  • Self-ratings, e.g. aggression questionnaires

  • Rated by others

  • Indirect spreading rumours

4
New cards

What does the frustration-aggression hypothesis propose?

  • Frustration is caused by being prevented from achieving a goal.

  • This, in turn, leads to aggression.

  • Frustration is regarded as the foundation of aggression.

  • This aggression is seen as a cathartic release (psychological release) of pent-up feelings, which can reduce the drive for further aggression

<ul><li><p><span><span>Frustration is caused by being prevented from achieving a goal.</span></span></p></li><li><p><span><span>This, in turn, leads to aggression.</span></span></p></li><li><p><span><span>Frustration is regarded as the foundation of aggression.</span></span></p></li><li><p><span><span>This aggression is seen as a cathartic release (psychological release) of pent-up feelings, which can reduce the drive for further aggression</span></span></p></li></ul><p></p>
5
New cards

What can frustration lead to according to later revisions of the frustration-aggression hypothesis?

Various responses, not just aggression, and aggression may be displaced onto a more convenient target.

6
New cards

What is the role of the environment in aggression according to Kenrick et al. (2003)?

The behavioural manifestation of a genotype depends critically on inputs from, and reactions to, the environment.

7
New cards

What was the main finding of Bandura's Bobo Doll Experiment?

Children who observed aggressive behaviour were more likely to imitate that behaviour.

8
New cards

Describe the 4 conditions of Bandura’s Bobo Doll study

  • 1. Adult was physically aggressive towards the doll (live)

  • 2. Adult was physically aggressive towards the doll (video)

  • 3. Adult was physically aggressive towards the doll (cartoon)

  • 4. Control condition: adult didn't perform any aggressive behaviour towards the doll, neutral behaviour

9
New cards

What are the four mediational processes in Bandura's social learning theory?

Attention, Retention, Motor reproduction, and Motivation.

10
New cards

Outline Straus et al’s (2003) study on spanking children

  • Longitudinal study over 2 years

  • Recorded how often the child was spanked (0-3+/week)

  • Positive relationship between frequency of spanking and anti-social behaviour of the child

  • Children who were not spanked showed less aggressive behaviour after 2 years

11
New cards

What was the outcome of Anderson et al. (2003) study on violent lyrics?

Violent lyrics triggered aggressive associations and contradicted the cathartic hypothesis.

12
New cards

Outline Black and Bevan’s (1992) study on violent films

  • Naturalistic experiment conducted in a real-world cinema

  • 129 adults

  • Montreal

  • Participants watched one film considered to be aggression and one non-violent

  • Participants who watched the violent film rated themselves higher on an aggression questionnaire and vice versa

13
New cards

What was the placebo effect observed in Begue et al. (2009) study?

Males acted more aggressively when they believed they consumed an alcoholic cocktail, even though it was non-alcoholic.

  • Controlled naturalistic field experiment - conducted in a bar

  • Studied males only - 115/116 pps

  • Male students given non-alcoholic cocktail as well as an alcoholic cocktail

  • Thought it was alcoholic (placebo effect)

  • Acted more aggressively with the placebo.Ā Ā Ā 

  • Even the connotations of alcohol can lead to an increase in aggression

14
New cards

What is prosocial behaviour according to Wispe (1972)?

Behaviour that has positive social consequences and contributes to the well-being of another person.

15
New cards

What is the common experience before acting prosocially?

A state of arousal followed by empathy.

16
New cards

How can empathy be learned ?

Through giving instructions, using reinforcement, and exposure to models.

17
New cards

What is the definition of helping behaviour?

Helping is intentional and benefits another living being or group.

18
New cards

What is the significance of Bandura's social learning theory in relation to aggression?

It emphasises that aggression can be learned through observation and imitation.

19
New cards

What does the term 'displacement' refer to in the context of aggression?

Redirecting aggression towards a more convenient target when the original source is too powerful or abstract.

20
New cards

What is the role of reinforcement in Bandura's theory?

Reinforcement influences the likelihood of a child reproducing aggressive behaviour.

21
New cards

What did Bandura's study reveal about gender differences in aggression?

Later research found that males were more aggressive than females.

22
New cards

What is the relationship between empathy and prosocial behaviour?

People often fail to act prosocially if they are actively engaged in avoiding empathy.

23
New cards

What is the impact of violent media on aggression according to the studies mentioned?

Exposure to violent media can increase aggressive thoughts and behaviours.

24
New cards

What is the importance of cognitive processes in Bandura's social learning theory?

Cognitive processes and abilities are crucial for understanding how aggression is learned and reproduced.

25
New cards

What is altruism?

An act meant to benefit another person rather than oneself; true altruism is selfless.

26
New cards

What hypothesis suggests that people believe they get what they deserve?

Just world hypothesis.

27
New cards

How do mood states affect prosocial behavior?

Good moods increase the likelihood of helping, while bad moods lead to internal focus.

28
New cards

What is image-reparation in the context of prosocial behavior?

Helping to make amends after causing harm or feeling guilty.

29
New cards

What is the negative state relief model?

Helping to reduce one's own bad mood, which is hedonistic rather than altruistic.

30
New cards

What personality traits predict prosocial behavior?

Agreeableness, self-transcendence, and empathic self-efficacy.

31
New cards

What did Mikulincer et al. find regarding attachment and altruism?

Those securely attached are more likely to be compassionate and altruistic.

32
New cards

According to Amato (1983), how does population size affect helping behavior?

Helping behaviour decreases as population size increases.

33
New cards

What is terror management theory?

The idea that the fundamental human motivation is to reduce the fear of death.

34
New cards

What did Baumeister et al. (1988) find about leadership and helping behavior?

Leaders helped more (80%) than followers (35%) in a simulated group task.

35
New cards

How does sexual attraction influence helping behavior?

More physically attractive individuals receive more help.

36
New cards

What is kin selection in evolutionary psychology?

The bias to help blood relatives to propagate one's own genes.

37
New cards

What is mutualism in the context of prosocial behavior?

Cooperative behavior that benefits both the co-operator and others.

38
New cards

What role does empathy play in altruism according to Patricia Oswald (1996)?

Empathy requires perspective taking and is vital for altruistic behavior.

39
New cards

How does experience with stressful situations affect empathy?

People with prior experience empathise more with others undergoing similar situations.

40
New cards

What did Rushton and Teachman (1978) find about modeling in children?

→ Boys aged 8-11 years watched an adult who played a game to win tokens.

  • Adult generously donated some to a later child: very emotional story behind them, e.g. poverty etc

  • Child played the same game after the adult had

Boys who observed positive reinforcement for generosity were more likely to donate tokens.

41
New cards

Outline Bryan and Test’s (1967) study of models on adults

  • Modelling can also work for adults - adult only study

  • Condition 1 – driver passed a woman whose car had a flat tyre and was being helped by a man. The driver then passed another woman by her car needing assistance

  • Condition 2 – the driver just passed the 2nd car where there was no model

  • Drivers in condition 1 were 50% more likely to help

  • Explained that we need modelling to promote positive behaviour in adults

42
New cards

Outline Hornstein’s (1970) study on modelling and emotional responses

  • People observed a model returning a lost wallet

    • Condition 1 – Model was pleased to help

    • Condition 2 – Model showed no strong emotion

    • Condition 3 – Model was displeased at the bother of having to help

  • Participants then found a ā€˜lost’ wallet

  • Condition 1 helped more than 2 which helped more than 3

  • Learning by vicarious experience: vicarious reinforcement

43
New cards

How do prosocial video games affect behavior according to Gentile et al. (2009)?

Prosocial content increases helping behaviour, while violent content increases hurting behavior.

44
New cards

What effect does listening to prosocial music have on behaviour?

It increases spontaneous helping behaviour.

45
New cards

What is prosocial music?

Music that, when listened to, increases spontaneous helping behavior.

46
New cards

What effect do prosocial videos have on behavior?

They increase helping behavior and make prosocial thoughts more accessible.

47
New cards

What case study sparked research on the bystander effect?

The murder of Kitty Genovese.

48
New cards

Outline the Kitty Genovese murder case study

  • Late one night in March 1964, Kitty is walking home after work

  • In a respectable neighbourhood within Queens in New York

  • In the half an hour it took to kill her, no one helped

  • 30 mins later, anonymous call, didn’t want to ā€œget involvedā€

  • 38 people hear the screams, but did not act

  • Media: Apathy? Indifference? Moral callousness?

49
New cards

What is the bystander effect?

The phenomenon where people are less likely to help in an emergency when others are present.

50
New cards

How does the number of bystanders affect helping behavior?

The greater the number of bystanders, the less likely it is that anyone will help.

51
New cards

What are the characteristics of an emergency situation?

It involves danger, is unusual, cannot be anticipated, and requires instant action.

52
New cards

What is diffusion of responsibility within the bystander effect?

The tendency to pass the responsibility to act to other available people.

53
New cards

What is audience inhibition within the bystander effect?

The fear of making a social blunder that prevents individuals from helping.

54
New cards

What role does social influence play in the bystander effect?

The passive behavior of others can serve as a model for how to act.

55
New cards

What did meta-analyses reveal about the bystander effect?

It becomes weaker in dangerous situations and when bystanders are familiar with the victim.

56
New cards

What is the bystander intervention?

When an individual breaks out of the role of a bystander and helps another person in an emergency.

57
New cards

What is the bystander-calculus model?

A model that describes how bystanders evaluate the costs and benefits of helping.

58
New cards

What are the three stages of the bystander-calculus model? (Piliavin)

  1. Physiological arousal,

  2. Labeling the arousal as an emotion

  3. Evaluating the consequences of helping.

59
New cards

What are the four motives for helping others?

  1. Egoism,

  2. Altruism

  3. Collectivism

  4. Principlism.

60
New cards

Outline Latane and Darley's 1968 study?

  • Male students in interview room

  • Smoke began to pour for 6 mins

  • Alone: 75% took action

  • 2 strangers 38% took action (bystander effect)

  • 2 passive confederates 10% took action (bystander effect)

  • Presence of others can inhibit people from responding to an emergency

61
New cards

What was the outcome of Latane and Rodin's 1969 study? *

Helping behaviour decreased as the number of bystanders increased.

62
New cards

What did Darley and Latane's 1968 study on seizures reveal?

Help rates decreased as the number of bystanders increased.

63
New cards

What is bystander apathy?

The phenomenon where individuals do not help in emergencies due to the presence of others.

64
New cards

What is the reciprocity principle in prosocial behavior?

The expectation to help those who have helped us.

65
New cards

What is the social responsibility norm?

The expectation to help those in need without regard to future exchanges.

66
New cards

What is the significance of familiarity with the victim in helping behavior?

Familiarity increases the likelihood of helping.

67
New cards

What did the study involving participants watching a victim in distress reveal?

Helping decreased as diffusion of responsibility, social influence, and audience inhibition increased.

68
New cards

What is the impact of shared social identity on helping behavior?

Expectation of later interaction or shared identity increases helping behavior.

69
New cards

What are the limits to the bystander effect?

Familiarity with the victim and expectation of shared identity can increase helping.

70
New cards

Outline Latane and Darley’s 5 stage cognitive model of bystander intervention

knowt flashcard image
71
New cards

What did Gaertner and Dovidio study about bystander apathy (1977)

Gaertner and Dovidio (1977) found that people are less likely to help in an emergency when others are present, due to diffusion of responsibility—each person assumes someone else will act.

72
New cards

What did Latane and Darley discover about the bystander effect (1976)?

Latane and Darley (1976) found that people are less likely to help in an emergency when others are present, showing the bystander effect—as the number of witnesses increases, individual responsibility to act decreases