Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
Hervey Cleckley
The antisocial facet, as it is based on behavior rather than personal traits
90% of psychopaths meet the criteria for ASPD
Psychopaths do not process the emotional content of words in the same way that others do
-they lack deep understanding of emotions
-sometimes exhibit sham emotions
the inability to learn from behaviors that punish
-hypersensitivity to rewards
-tendency to seek high risk high reward scenarios
psychopathy
Ted Bundy was lying, deceitful, displaying sham emotion to manipulate audience
They tend to lack empathy and often justify harmful actions, they are more likely to take the utilitarian route in moral dilemmas
We exclude accidents, sports
-focus on physical harm, easier to measure than mental or emotional
Decisions regarding public safety and appropriate interventions.
-probation, security, sentence mitigation, parole, etc
Oconner v Donaldson, Tarasoff v Regents of the University of California, Bartfoot vs Estelle, Kansas v Hendricks
How well did these early risk assessments work?
Actuarial and Structured Professional
Judgement risk assessments work about the
same
Prevention strategies
short term predictions, when we have a lot of information on the individual, when there is a high base rate of violence
using categories (low, medium, high risk) because they are less precise and easier to communicate
Non-consensual use of force to engage in sexual contact or behavior.
A child molester engages in sexual acts with anyone under the age of consent, while a pedophile has an enduring sexual attraction to prepubescent children.
risk of future sexual offending
whether they will respond to treatment
Both evaluate risk and necessitate judgment about future behaviors, has the same debates of clinical vs actuarial vs spj
Sex offenders are more likely to recidivate for NON sexual offenses
Both methods provide valuable information, but actuarial instruments may have greater predictive validity
-different measures suited for different situations
SVR-20 (professional judgement) for risk management
SORAG (actuarial): predicts risk of sexual/nonsexual violence
Cognitive-behavioral therapy, target underlying deficits, relapse prevention
Treatment can slightly reduce recidivism rates, but outcomes vary.
Many studies lack long-term follow-up data, recidivism rates
there is a lack of quality assessment measures for juveniles
Approximately 2-5% convicted offenders
About 1.5%
Approximately 2-4%.
They fail to address the underlying risk factors related to offending
-exacerbate reintegration difficulties