1/23
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
rhetoric
Aristotle
his work on the subject of rhetoric is the foundation of any study of rhetoric
believed that by observing how communication happens, we can understand how to develop sound and convincing arguements
3 rhetorical appeals
logos
ethos
pathos
logos
appeals to audience’s logical reasoning and rantional thinking
ethos
appeals to audience’s sense of right and wrong
based on sound morality
treats the opposing side fairly
speaker/writer is trustworthy and reliable
any testimonials/representatives are also trustworthy
no offensive language/visuals
the strongest arguements….
will use all three appeals
too much logos…
boring and confusing to some
to much ethos…
to preachy and self righteous
to much pathos…
overly sentimental, will fizzle because the argument is clearly weak
a close analysis of audience….
help determine how to best use each appeal
fallacy
deceptive, false, or misleading idea which creates a misleading or unsound argument
in order for an argument to succeed..
no weak spots for opponent
fallaces → weak argument → easily defeatable
logical fallacies (LF)
a hasty generalization draws conclusions from scanty evidence
post hoc ergo proper hoc or faulty causality (LF)
confuses chronology with causation
non sequitur (LF)
“does not follow” statement that does no relate logically to what comes before it