1/15
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Prisoners dilemma
people might not cooperate even if its in their best interest to
Hardin’s ideas
the environment should be controlled by the government or private property
makes commons into non-commons
Institutions
strong norms lead to constrained use of natural resources
Successful commons management
Boundaries, proportionality, collective choice, monitoring, sanctions, autonomy
Problems with the solutions to the ToC
gender - some women aren’t allowed to own lands = no access to resources
all commons can be influenced by income, race, social differences of power
What does E.Ostrom do?
Re-assess Hardins model and argues for self-organized institutions, conditions favoring sustainable local common pool resource management
Ostroms rebuttle
1.humans rely on reputation, trust, and community to solve problems
2.ToC is real but not inevitable, people use self-organizing rules
3.local communities should be the governance
Characteristics of common-pool resources & solutions
non-excludable
Subtractability (exploitation reduces the resources for others)
solutions: restrict access & create incentives & assign rights
4 property rights system
open access, group property, individual property, government property
(L) the commons must be
non-excludable & rivalrous or subtractable
(L) examples of common property resources
fisheries, water resources
(L) Hardin
self-interested individuals will destroy the commons bc everyone is selfish
solutions: gov’t control, privitization
(L) Ostrom beleifs of CPR
institutions (rules, norms) for governing CPR because they are the closest to the resource
(L) Ostroms rules
1.Boundaries - boundaries of the resources are clearly defined
2.Monitoring - monitoring members behaviors
3.Sanctions - punishment used on violators
4.Conflict resolution - community members have ways of resolving conflict
With climate change every rule breaks down
(L) collective choice
most individuals affected by these rules can participate in modifying the rules
(L) Autonomy
the rights of community members to devise their own rules is respected by other authorities