1/16
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
4th amendment
requires warrants based on probable cause and specific details
reasonableness clause
govt. can’t conduct unreasonable searches/seizures
warrant clause
to get a warrant, police need good reason (probable cause), sworn oath, and say what/where they’re searching
warrant preference view
warrants should be obtained when possible; emergencies are exceptions
probable cause
facts that would make someone believe a crime happened; more than a guess, about 50% sure)
reasonable suspicion
less proof than probable cause, more than a gut feeling; allows stop-and-frisk (Terry v. Ohio)
search
when the government invades your privacy (going thru private info)
government agent
not just cops; people of other professions acting like police
reasonable expectation of privacy
if you think something’s private and society agrees it shoul dbe private, it’s protected (Katz case)
curtilage
the private area around your house that’s protected (yard, porch, barn, driveway)
Open Fields Doctrine
anything outside your house/yard (like woods) has no privacy protection
abandoned property
trash or stuff you throw out has no privacy protection
enhanced devices
tools like flashlights, drug dogs, GPS, drones. GPS = needs warrant, flashlight, drone flyover = no warrant
stop-and-frisk (terry v ohio)
a quick pat-down if police have reasonable suspicion you’re armed or hiding drugs
administrative justification
schools, probationers, and certain businesses (alc, drugs, tobacco) have less privacy for safety reasons
undercover/false friend rule
if you share info with someone (een undercover cops), it’s not private anymore
Third Party Doctrine
info you share with companies (phone, bank, internet) usually isn’t private under the 4th amendment