1/13
Social Influence
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Social Psychology
The study of how people influence others’ behavior, beliefs, and attitudes
Fundamental Attribution Error
Tendency to overestimate the impact of dispositional influences on other people’s behavior
Attribution
Process of assigning causes to behavior
“Assuming”
Ex:
You see someone getting yelled at by someone else
You may overestimate the impact of someone’s disposition and you assume the person yelling is crazy or always mad
You don’t think of why they are reacting like that, for example someone could have stolen from them
Conformity
Tendency of people to alter their behavior as a result of group pressure
Don’t know what to do (think others know something we don’t)
Want to fit it (not be the “odd man out”)
Asch Study (1955)
This experiment asked participants to pick which line matches the standard line and announce their choice out loud
Confederates were told to pick the obviously wrong line to see how many participants would conform
Results:
They found that Âľ people would conform at least once
Much less conformity IF:
Subjects privately wrote answers (instead of saying out loud)
One confederate said correct answer
Subject answered early
Conformity “in the wild”
In this experiment confederates in a dental office would stand each time they heard a beep
This prompted those not aware of the study to also stand when they heard the beep even if they don’t know why
When confederates left, those not aware of the study continued to stand when they heard the beep
This caused others who did not see the confederates to follow even if they don’t know why
Deindividuation
Tendency of people to engage in uncharacteristic behavior when they are stripped of their usual identities
Cause of behavior change:
Loss of sense of self
Anonymity
Lack of personal responsibility
Ex:
When someone cyberbullies someone else because they know there identity is hidden
Standford Prison Study
Study was conducted by Philip Zimbardo
He wanted to see what happens if people deindividualize
He gathered participants that would either act as guards or prisoners
During the study, the guards gained a sense of authority (power) and started abusing the prisoners
Results:
Experiment had to be ended after 6 days because prisoners and guards started to loss a sense of self and believed they were actually guards/ prisoners
Obedience
Adherence to instruction from those of higher authority
We are more likely to obey when there is:
Command/order + power differential
Milgram Experiments (1960s)
Conducted by Stanley Milgram
He asked how do situational factors shape obedience?
Study
There is an experimenter who gives commands to the participants (teacher) when a confederate (learner) would answer correctly or wrong
If the learner gets an answer wrong then they will receive a shock, the voltage of shock is determined by experimenter
Results:
When the experimenter asked the teachers to increase the voltage they would, even if they know they are hurting learner
All participants administered at least some shocks
62% went up to 450 volts
People are more likely to obey those in authority even if they know it is wrong
Milgram Experiment Variations
The teachers are most likely not to obey experimenter if their was more psychological distance between them
If the experimenter was further away instead of hovering over them
The teachers also are more likely to disobey if the learner was closer to them
The teacher could hear them
Why did people obey?
Socialization of obedience
Shedding of responsibility
Gradual escalation
People disobeyed because:
Early resistance prevent rationalization
If people resist early on or ask more question earlier they are more likely to disobey those in authority
Socialization of obedience
We are taught that we should listen to authority figures
Shedding of responsibility
Who is ultimately responsible?
Gradual escalation
15-volt increments v. one big button
Button starts off at 450 V