Quantitative Research Design (Part 2)

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/50

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 7:51 AM on 3/11/25
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

51 Terms

1
New cards

Non-Experimental Designs

- observational research

- Most nursing studies are of this design because most human characteristics cannot be experimentally manipulated

- Most variable can not be manipulated ethically

2
New cards

Non-Experimental Designs

1. Descriptive-Normative or Survey

2. Correlational

3. Casual-Comparative or Ex Post Facto

3
New cards

Descriptive-Normative/Survey

A. Longitudinal Survey

B. Cross-sectional Survey

4
New cards

Longitudinal Survey

- Studies in which the same group of subjects are studied over time

- Trend studies, Cohort studies, Panel studies

5
New cards

Trend studies

use the same population across time but use different samples from that population each time

6
New cards

Cohort studies

examine a specific group (same population) over time

7
New cards

Panel studies

cohort studies that use the same samples each time

8
New cards

Cross-Sectional Survey

- Attempt to stimulate longitudinal data in a shorter time frame

- Data are gathered from multiple samples of the same population simultaneously

9
New cards

Cross-Sectional Survey

May be used to study a phenomenon at one time or to gather data from multiple groups at the same time

10
New cards

Types of Survey Administration

- Direct Administration

- Mailed Survey

- Telephone Interview

- Personal/face-to-face interview

11
New cards

Correlational

A. Retrospective correlational or case-control study

B. Prospective correlational or cohort study

C. Descriptive correlational

Correlation does not prove causation.

12
New cards

Retrospective Design

A phenomenon existing in the present is linked to phenomena that occurred in the past

13
New cards

Retrospective Design

The researcher begins with the dependent variable (the effect) and then examines whether it is correlated with one or previously occurring independent variables (potential causes)

14
New cards

Prospective Design

- Cohort Design

- Researchers start with a presumed cause and then go forward in time to the presumed effect

15
New cards

Ex-Post Facto Studies

- Used to investigate causal relationships

- Examine whether one or more pre-existing conditions could possibly have caused subsequent differences in groups of subjects

- some sources would categorize this as a quasi-experimental study

16
New cards

Ex-Post Facto Studies

Researchers attempt to discover whether differences between groups have resulted in an observed difference in the independent variable

17
New cards

Ex-Post Facto Studies

Examples:

- What is the effect of day care on the social skills of children?

- What is the relationship between participation in extracurricular activities and self concept?

18
New cards

Quantitative Designs

2 main classifications:

- Descriptive or analytical

- Experimental or non-experimental

19
New cards

Descriptive

- describes

- more exploratory

- profiles group characteristics

20
New cards

Descriptive

- "what"

- assumes NO hypothesis

- does not require comparisons between groups over time

21
New cards

Epidemiology

The study of how often diseases occur in different groups of people and why

22
New cards

Epidemiological information

used to plan and evaluate strategies to prevent illness and as a guide to managing patients in whom the disease has already developed

23
New cards

Epidemiology

Purposes:

- To understand what risk factors are associated with a specific disease, and how this disease can be prevented in groups of individuals

- "OBSERVE"

24
New cards

Epidemiology

Would want to predict and know more about the disorder by studying and discovering the risk factors, the protective factors in order to prevent further spread and mitigate the spread of the disorder properly.

25
New cards

Descriptive

Types:

- Case studies or case series

- Descriptive cross-sectional/prevalence surveys

- Ecologic descriptive studies

26
New cards

Hierarchy of study designs

1. Experiments/Intervention studies

2. Cohort studies

3. Case-control studies

27
New cards

Hierarchy of study designs

4. Prevalence studies/surveys

5. Ecologic studies

6. Case series

7. Case reports

28
New cards

Case studies/Case series

- A simple descriptive account of interesting characteristics observed in a group (series) of subjects

- Subjects do not necessarily have to be persons - they can be organizations, institutions, political units (province, municipality, barangay etc.)

29
New cards

Case studies/Case series

- Generally involve subjects seen over a relatively short period of time

- Does not include control subjects

- Does not involve any research hypothesis

30
New cards

Case studies/Case series

Findings generally lead to generation of hypothesis that are subsequently investigated in a cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional study

31
New cards

Descriptive cross-sectional/prevalence surveys

- Involves the collection of data on the occurrence and distribution of the disease of interest in population

- Also used in health systems research to describe prevalence according to patterns of health service utilization and compliance

- KAP surveys

32
New cards

Descriptive cross-sectional/prevalence surveys

To characterize the disease, the prevalence is usually computed for specific categories of variable related to:

- Person

- Place

- Time

33
New cards

Ecologic descriptive studies

- Unit of observation and unit of analysis is an aggregate rather than individual persons

- They are used to generate hypothesis, or as a quick method of examining associations

34
New cards

Ecologic descriptive studies

Most practical design to use when exposure level is relatively homogenous in a population but differs between populations (ex., water quality) or when individual measurements of exposure are impossible

35
New cards

ecological fallacy

- the most serious flaw of ecologic descriptive studies

- ie., the characteristics of the geographical unit are incorrectly attributed to individuals

36
New cards

Analytic

Types:

1. Cohort studies

2. Case-control studies

3. Cross-sectional studies

4. Experimental studies and clinical trials

#1-3 are observational studies

37
New cards

Observational studies

Core elements of investigation the relationship between disease and exposure

38
New cards

Prospective Cohort Study

- Start from the present

- Conduct a follow-up after study

39
New cards

Retrospective Cohort Study

- From the past

- Check for exposed and unexposed sample from past data

40
New cards

Advantages of Cohort Studies

1. May yield information on the incidence of the disease

2. Possible to compute for the relative risk

3. The temporal relationship between exposure and disease is clearly defined

41
New cards

Advantages of Cohort Studies

4. The design is particularly efficient for studies involving rare exposure factors

5. It is the strongest observational design for establishing cause-effect relationships

42
New cards

Disadvantages of Cohort Studies

1. Time consuming

2. Often requires a large sample size

3. Expensive

43
New cards

Disadvantages of Cohort Studies

4. Not efficient for the study of rare diseases

5. Losses to follow-up may diminish validity

6. Changes over time in diagnostic methods may lead to biased results

44
New cards

Advantages of Case Control Studies

1. Feasible when dealing with RARE disease

2. Requires a smaller sample size than a cohort study - easy for follow-up

3. Little problem with attrition

45
New cards

Disadvantages of Case Control Studies

1. Incidence rates and attributable risk cannot be computed due to small sample size

2. The temporal sequence between disease and exposure may be a problem

3. Big chance for bias in the selection of cases and controls

46
New cards

Disadvantages of Case Control Studies

4. Difficult to obtain information on exposure if the recall period is too long

5. Selective survival may bias the comparison

47
New cards

Population-based case control studies

Cases and controls are sampled from a defined population

48
New cards

Population-based case control studies

Advantages:

1. Source population is better defined

2. It is easier to make certain that cases and controls come from the same source population

3. The exposure histories of the control are more likely to reflect those of persons without the disease of interest

49
New cards

Hospital-based case control Studies

- Investigator selects cases from persons with the disease of interest who are admitted to a particular hospital

- Controls are selected from persons admitted with other conditions but with no evidence of the disease of interest

50
New cards

Hospital-based case control Studies

Advantages:

- Subjects are more accessible

- Subjects tend to be more cooperative

- Background characteristics of cases and controls may be balanced

- Easier to collect exposure information from medical records and biological experiments

51
New cards

Hospital-based case control Studies

Possible disadvantages:

- Variety of case chosen

- Depending on the specialization hospital you are in

- Patient tends to reject participation

- Lesser sample size