1/20
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Science
not just a collection of knowledge
systematic way of knowing everything
methodical approach used to understand the natural world
relies on observation, experimentation, and analysis to build and organize knowledge
Scientific Method
process of science depends on the testing of ideas with evidence gathered from the natural world
process of investigation to find or produce measurable and reliable results that answer a specific question
seeks to disconfirm
Observation
1st step in the scientific method
things/information we note by using our five senses
the way we notice important details in our surroundings
Question
2nd step in the scientific method
details we noticed during observations will spark our curiosity
the most interesting ones will make us ask questions that we want answered
Research
3rd step in the scientific method
important to look up what is already known
opens us up to answered and unanswered questions about our topic
prepares us for the next steps in the process
Hypothesis
4th step in the scientific method
tentative explanation to our initial question based on what we know so far
should be
testable: should be testable through experiments or observations
empirical: empirical evidence or observations; should be grounded in what is known from previous research or preliminary data, rather than being purely speculative
repeatable: open avenues for further investigation. It should contribute to the development of additional questions and experiments
predictive: a good hypothesis should make predictions that are measurable and observable, providing a basis for validating or invalidating the hypothesis
falsifiable: it should be structured in a way that evidence could potentially disprove it
Data Gathering
5th step in the scientific method
stage where we get to test our hypothesis
can be a test or series of tests done in a controlled environment to validate our observations and answer our questions
qualitative - descriptive, five senses
quantitative - numbers
Independent Variable
variable that doesn’t change throughout the test
Dependent Variable
variable that changes throughout the test depending on the independent variables
Analysis
6th step in the scientific method
compare our expected results with our actual results
gather measurable results that can prove if our hypothesis is true or false
Evaluation
7th step in the scientific method
evaluate our results and draw conclusions from if
summarizes the information we gathered during the scientific process and shares if our hypothesis is correct can be supported
do the results answer the initial hypothesis and observation
Scientific Perspectives
influence how we perceive and interpret various phenomena, from health to technology
Pseudoscience
lacks empirical support
often relies on anecdotal evidence
does not adhere to the scientific method
begs to be confirmed
science must be…
peer review and reproducibility
falsifiability
Psychobabble
misuse of words from psychology, but the idea of using scientific jargon incorrectly applies to all fields of science
in psychology, it can lead to normalizing or excusing conditions that should instead be treated or addressed
Substantial Reliance on Anecdotal Evidence
proponents claim that crystals possess special energy or healing properties that can improve physical, emotional, or spiritual being. this belief is not supported by rigorous, scientific evidence, but persists due to anecdotal reports and personal testimonies
Unfalsifiable Claims
nature is home to beings we cannot see
this is why we have to say tabi-tabi po when we pee in nature.
Lack of Self-Correction
just because it’s been used for a thousand years, doesn’t mean it’s still correct
Absence of Connectivity to Other Research
often ignore or misinterpret the well-established principles and other substantial evidences, such as photographs from space and satellite data
Absence of Adequate Peer-Review
a claim that was claimed by one person only
lacks studies
Extraordinary Claims in the Absence of Extraordinary Evidence
no concrete physical evidences
Impacts of Pseudoscience
can mislead people, potentially leading to harmful practices or neglect of effective treatments
critical evaluation of claims is essential to prevent the spread of misinformation