1/27
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Better regulation toolkit
Impact Assessment
Better implementation / enforcement
Codification / consolidation / recast of legislation
Forward planning and political validation
Risk-based approaches to public policy
Non-regulatory options
Cumulative cost assessments (CCA)
Foresight studies
Better implementation / enforcement
Non-legislative improvements oriented at the internal functioning of public institutions
Codification / consolidation / recast of legislation
Merging of several acts into a single act, improving access to, ease of understand, and coherence of framework
Forward planning and political validation
Work should focus on the Commission’s priorities as reflected in the president’s political guidelines and the commission’s annual work programme
Includes political consideration of and support to the initiative (validation)
Publication of a “call for evidence” to gather stakeholder feedback
Reduction of administrative burdens
Under efficiency umbrella
Costs companies incur for providing information to the public administration or third parties (e.g. labeling medicinal products, filing of tax reports)
Equated with “red tape”
Measured via Standard Cost Model
Consultation
Structured formal process through which stakeholders (public and private) may represent their own views on the stock or flow of policies
Essential element got policymaking, to collect feedback and evidence
Initiated by the Commission and illustrated in the ‘Consultation Strategy’
Mandatory Open Public Consultation via an online questionnaire open for 12 weeks for major legislative initiatives and evaluations
Ex-post evaluation / fitness checks
Assessment of inputs and effects of a policy or expenditure program
Based on gathering evidence on how a specific intervention has performed after a certain period of application
Eval focuses on a single piece of legislation; fitness checks cover a whole policy area (set of interrelated policies)
Based on five criteria: relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, coherence, EU added value
Implementation and supporting
Risk-based approaches to public policy
Tailoring s regulation so that it is “big on big things,” i.e. on those subjects with the highest risk of noncompliance or producing the largest negative effects
Non-regulatory options
Adoption of market-based tools; self- and co-regulatory methods
Less intrusive and costly than command and control? De-regulation
Cumulative cost assessments (CCA)
Assessment of “all” costs imposed by “all” EU acts on a single industry
Sectoral perspective, competitiveness-driven approaches to public, no benefits
Foresight studies
Long term analyses of mega-trends, distant evolution, to make sure that the legislation is “future proof”
2021 priorities
Support sustainability in the broader sense (do no harm principle, SDGs)
Promote digital by default reg to support digital transformation
One-in-one-out for administrative costs
“Do no significant harm” principle
Under the Green Deal and Taxonomy Regulation
Climate change mitigation: no increase in GHG emissions
Climate change adaption: no worsening of current GHG effects
Sustainable use / protection of water and marine resources
Circular economy: no hamper to recycling,
One-in-one-out principle
Consists in offsetting new burdens from Commission’s legislative proposals by reducing existing burdens in the same policy area (applied only to administrative, not adjustment costs)
Commitment by the President to draft policies that “make life easier for businesses” and regulation easy to comply with (no unnecessary burdens)
Ensures policymakers focus on implementation and compliance
Public consultation
Encourage active participation, streamline consultation process, reduction of burdens
Impact Assessment
A procedure resulting in a document
Assesses the effects of proposed policies on the EU and affected stakeholders
Provides a comparison of different policy options based on foreseeable effects
Supports decision making through evidence
Meta-instrument: a framework structure for many better regulation tools
Based on and reinforcing the better regulation framework
Policy decisions…
…are usually based on limited information about impacts and affected stakeholders
Regulatory Scrutiny Board
Quality-checks impact assessments
“Gatekeeper,” aimed at enhancing the quality of IAs through (harsh) dialogue with the lead DG
7 members with 1 chair
Free Trade Areas
Abolition of tariffs and quotas within a group of countries for goods originating within the area
Customs Union
Free Trade Area + common external trade policy (common external tariffs and quotas)
Common Market
Customs Union + free movement for goods, services and input factors (labor, capital, knowledge)
Monetary Union
Common Market + common currency
Problems in the 80s
Maintenance of (physical, technical, tax related) frontiers
Physical frontiers
Abolishing checks on goods and persons at internal borders
Technical frontiers
Breaking down the barriers of national regulations on products and services
Achievements of EC1992 (to 1995)
First kernel of the Schengen Agreement
First harmonized regulation for sensitive markets
Common regulation and mutual trust for sensitive products
Wider scope of application of Mutual Recognition
Common merger policy (competition policy)
Abolition of national external trade quotas