Corporate Law IBA 2025 Midterm

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/84

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

85 Terms

1
New cards

Public Law / Common Law

It is about the relationship between the state and its citizens.

  • Government involvement is key

  • Constitutional, administrative, and criminal law

  • Characteristic: You do not depend on legal books but more on judgement. It is about the legal verdicts of courts (shareholder oriented)

2
New cards

Private / Civil law

Rights and duties of natural persons towards each other

  • The government is typically not a party

  • Contract, tort, property, trusts, family

  • Characteristics: Primary source of the law is the law books. We still have verdicts that can also determine the determination of legal rights

3
New cards

Tort

It is a civil wrong, other than breach of contract, that causes a claimant to suffer loss or harm, resulting in legal liability for the person who commits the tortious act

4
New cards

Corporations

Legal forces where you can effectively organize your business activities.

  • It is a legal entity with limited liability

  • Most commonly used business form for larger economic activities

5
New cards

Closed / Private Corporations

Not traded on stock excahnge, limited number of shareholders, less regulation

E.g., family businesses

6
New cards

Open / Public Corporations

Listed on stock exchange, many shareholders, stricter regulations, raises capital trough stock sales, such as Tesla and Apple

7
New cards

Main Actors Corperations

Shareholders, employees, the corporate board / directors, and creditors

8
New cards

Creditors

  • Have a priority claim so are paid first in case of bankruptcy.

  • No voting rights

  • Fix claim

9
New cards

General Partnership

  • Structure where two or more people co-own a business.

  • Unlimited liability

  • Everyone has the same authority

10
New cards

Limited Partnership

  • Partnership with at least one general partner and one or more limited partners.

  • General partners have unlimited liability,

  • Limited partners have limited liability

11
New cards

Limited Liability Partnership

  • All partners have limited liability

  • All partners can be involved in management

12
New cards

Limited Liability Limited Partnership

  • Both general and limited partners have limited liability

13
New cards

Sole proprietorship

  • One person is responsible for all aspects of the business

  • Unlimited liability, so responsible for all debts and liabilities

  • Has full control over the business

  • Businesses are not taxed separately

  • Minimal regulation

14
New cards

Jurisdiction

  • Legal authority that a specific country, state, or court has over a business entity

  • Federal government: Governs national laws and regulations

  • State governments: Handle laws specific to each state, including corporate law

15
New cards

Federal Court

Handles cases related to federal matters such as patents, securities, or interstate lawsuits, such as disputes that cross state lines

16
New cards

State Court

Handles most legal matters, such as corporate law, contracts, and business disputes

17
New cards

Example DGCL

Many multinational corporations are incorporated in Delaware due to its corporation-friendly policies and favorable tax policies

18
New cards

Example Sarbanes-Oxley Act

Federal US law that protects investors from fraudulent accounting activities by corporations

19
New cards

EU Regulation

A binding legislative act. It must be applied in its entirety across the EU. Most are useful and strict, as they bind the legal subjects

20
New cards

EU Directives

Set out a goal that all EU countries must achieve. However, it is up to the member states to devise their laws and how to reach these goals. Difference between minimum and maximum harmonisation

21
New cards

Minimum Harmonisation

The EU sets a basic standard that all member states must follow, but they are free to introduce stricter national rules if necessary. This allows each member state to adopt the directive to its own situation

22
New cards

Maximum Harmonisation

The EU sets a standard but leaves no room for stricter or flexible national rules. It fully harmonizes a particular area of law, and thus all MS must follow exactly the same rules

23
New cards

EU Recommendations

Not binding. A recommendation allows the institutions to make their views known and to suggest a line of action without imposing any legal obligation on those to whom it is addressed

24
New cards

Hard Law

Legally binding regulations, such as corporate laws and security laws (traffic lights)

25
New cards

Soft Law

Non-binding guidelines, principles, or best practices that companies are encouraged to follow but are not legally required to

26
New cards

Corporate governance code

A soft law. Sets of principles that outline the best practices for companies in areas such as transparency and shareholder rights

Many corporate governance codes operate under a flexible approach where companies can:

  • Comply: With the governance rules

  • Explain: Why they do not follow the rules

This allows businesses to adopt best practices to their specific needs

27
New cards

Incorporation

The formation of a company. Different documents need to be filed, including the Articles of Association. To be legally recognized, companies must be incorporated according to specific jurisdictional requirements

28
New cards

Articles of Association

The Articles of Association are a legal document that outlines the rules and regulations for the internal management and operation of a company. They serve as a contract between the company and its shareholders, directors, and officers.

It consists of:

Mandatory rules: Cannot be modified by contract. Usually aim to protect weaker parties (creditors)

Default rules: Applicable in case articles of association or another contract do not state otherwise

29
New cards

Basic legal characteristics

  1. Legal personality

  2. Limited liability

  3. Transferability of shares

  4. Delegated management under a board structure

  5. Investor ownership (sometimes state ownership)

30
New cards

Legal Personality

Treats a company like a person, meaning it can own property, sign contracts, and act separately from its shareholders.

However, since it’s not a real person, it needs someone to represent it and make decisions on its behalf

31
New cards

Entity Shielding

Because of legal personality, the company is the owner of the assets, and shield these from the shareholders

32
New cards

Liquidation Protection

The shareholders cannot withdraw the company’s assets at will, preserving the company’s ongoing value

33
New cards

Priority Rule

Ensure that the company’s creditors have the first claim on the corporation’s assets for any company debts before shareholders can claim any residual value

34
New cards

Separate Patrimony

Legal concept where a person or entity has a distinct pool of assets and liabilities that are legally separated from their personal or other business assets

35
New cards

Limited Liability

Shareholders are only liable up to their committed investment

36
New cards

Owner shielding

Shields the shareholders from the liabilities of the company

37
New cards

Advantages of limited liability

  1. Effective capital markets; without limited liability, you wouldn’t invest in companies

  2. Without it, there wouldn’t be any start-ups in the first place

  3. Reduces the need for shareholders to monitor every step and facilitates the diversification strategies used by investors

38
New cards

Asset Partitioning

Assets of the corporation are separated from those of the shareholders

39
New cards

Tort victims

Creditors that become creditors unintentionally

  • Become creditors when there is a lawsuit and the judge grants them a claim

  • Cannot negotiate ex ante about the terms of their claims, and thus risk cannot be translated into better protection

40
New cards

Judgement Proof Problem

Occurs when companies limit their liability by structuring assets in a way that reduces what creditors can claim.

If a subsidary has low assets, creditors may not get full compensation, even if the corporate group as a whole is wealthy

41
New cards

Transferable Shares

  • Really crucial for a company’s continuity when ownership changes

  • Enhance the liquidity of shareholder investments because they make it easier for shareholders to maintain diversified portolios

42
New cards

Authorized Capital

The maximum share capital that the company is allowed to issue which is stated in the articles of association. If it wants to increase this number, it needs to get approval of the existing shareholders

43
New cards

Issued Capital

Part of the authorised capital that is issued to investors

44
New cards

Treasury shares

Issued capital that is bought back by the company and held in treasury

45
New cards

Paid-up Capital

The amount of money actually received from shareholders for the shares

46
New cards

In-kind contributions

Shares can also be issued for non-monetary contributions, these need to be assessed

47
New cards

European minimum capital rule

Minimum capital is 25,000 euros according to the European Capital Directive, but member states may set higher amounts

48
New cards

Main arguments against minimum capital requirements

  1. Does not provide meaningful protection for creditors

    • The assets that are bought with the share capital can decline in value, whereas the legal capital stays fixed

  2. There is no actual relationship between the minimum capital and the business activities or funding needs of a public company

    • The same requirement for both small and large firms

    • The liabilities of any company are well beyond this minimum capital requirement

  3. Creditors can be better protected in other ways

  4. The minimum capital may increase the costs of starting a public company, which may limit entrepreneurship and innovation

49
New cards

Delegated Management under a board structure

Principle authority over corporate affairs: generally elected by shareholders

This structure allows a company to operate efficiently by centralizing decision-making authority within a corporate board

50
New cards

Capital rights

Financial rights:

  • Dividends

  • Sale of shares

51
New cards

Control rights

Decision-making rights:

  • Essential rights for shareholders to influence corporate governance

  • Vote

  • Question the board

  • Certain information rights

52
New cards

Manager-Shareholder conflict

Managers have more information and potentially different interests than shareholders, leading to decisions that may not always align with what shareholders want

Different interests include FCF problems, risk appetite, different time horizons, and on-the-job consumption

53
New cards

The Majority-Minority Shareholder Conflict

In firms with controlling shareholders, majority owners may make decisions that benefit themselves at the expense of minority shareholders

Self-dealing transactions, excessive executive pay, or strategic dilution of minority stakes

54
New cards

The Shareholder-Creditor Conflict

Shareholders may pursue riskier projects to maximize returns, knowing that creditors bear much of the downside risk

Firms may issue excessive debt, prioritize dividend payments over loan obligations, or take on high-risk ventures without regard for creditor interests

55
New cards

Legal Strategies

Mitigate the vulnerability of principals to the opportunism of their agents

  1. Regulatory strategies: Agent constraining = Focus in US

  2. Governance strategies: Principal empowering = Focus in Europe

56
New cards

Appointment Rights and Decision Rights

Selection and Removal / Initiation and Veto: Shareholder appointment rights, decision-making rights, and shareholder and management proposals

57
New cards

Exit rights

Investors and creditors can sell shares, trigger covenants, or seek legal remedies if corporate governance failures become evident

58
New cards

Unitary Boards

  • Common in the US and UK

  • A single board oversees management

59
New cards

Two-Tier Boards

  • Common in Germany and other European countries

  • A supervisory board oversees a separate management board

60
New cards

Options for shareholders to share their dissatisfaction with the management

  1. They can sell their shares and thus exit the company

  2. They can use their voting rights and other decision-making rights to influence the corporate governance of the company directly

61
New cards

Fundamental decisions for shareholders

  • Appointment rights: Appoint board members who are in charge of strategic decision-making

  • Decision rights: Voting on M&A, changes to the corporate charter, and changes to Articles of Association

  • Management proposals (veto/ratification): The board suggests these to the AGM, where shareholders can vote on these proposals

  • Shareholder proposals

62
New cards

Annual General Meeting (AGM)

A formal decision-making body where shareholders use their voting rights. Shareholders can individually or collectively make decisions that are legally valid and shape the direction of the company

63
New cards

Appointment Rights

It’s a ratification right. The board usually nominates its own candidates, and shareholders can then approve or disapprove of these at the AGM

It includes the removal of shareholder-appointed directors, which can only be removed by shareholders, usually without a valid cause and at any time

64
New cards

Decision-making rights

  • Increasing the share capital

  • Waiver of pre-emption rights

  • Repurchase of shares

  • Nachgründung

    • These four are related to share capital and mostly belong to shareholders in Europe. In the US the board of directors is mostly in charge of these

  • Amending articles of association (charter amendments)

  • Large transactions, mergers, and demergers

  • Related to external auditor

  • Annual financial statements

  • Dividends

  • Say on Pay

  • RPT (related-party transaction)

  • Discharge

65
New cards

Amending articles of association

  • Always need a shareholder vote to change articles of association

  • In most countries a quality majority is needed, a higher majority than simply 50% (e.g., 2/3). Exceptions are Delaware and The Netherlands

66
New cards

Discharge

Very common in continental Europe. Is the declaration or the statement of shareholders to not hold their board members liable for everything they disclosed to them in a certain financial year

67
New cards

Pre-emption rights

Allow existing shareholders to be the first to buy new shares that will be issued by the company. Mandatory in Europe, shareholders from the US do not possess these rights

68
New cards

Nachgründung

A right that involves transactions with founders or major shareholders. The shareholders have the right to approve or disapprove these transactions within a certain timeframe

69
New cards

Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act

Allows shareholders to make shareholder proposals, which the corporate board must include in the proxy statements

70
New cards

Proxy Statements

The invitations that include the information about the shareholder meeting

71
New cards

Resubmission thresholds

Ensures that a proposal that gets repeatedly rejected must gain increasing support over time to be reconsidered

72
New cards

Proxy fights / contests

  • The party seeking to gain control over the company through the corporate board proposes its own board members for election at the shareholder meeting.

  • For this, an own proxy campaign needs to be started.

  • Can be considered a takeover strategy

73
New cards

3 of the 13 grounds of exclusion of Rule 14a-8

  1. The nomination of a specific individual in the company’s proxy materials for election to the board of directors

  2. A proposal that deals with a matter relating to ordinary day-to-day business operations

  3. A shareholder proposal that micromanages the company: If it is too prescriptive, limiting the discretionary powers of the board of directors

74
New cards

Proxy access

The shareholder right to include its own nominees with the company’s proxy matierals without having to circulate their own proxy materials

75
New cards

Contral Enhancing Mechanisms

Mechanisms that allow shareholders with minimal stake to have majority control (i.e., controlling minority). Pyramid Structure and Dual-Class Firms

76
New cards

Pyramid Structure

Controlling minority shareholders that holds a controlling stake in a holding company that, in turn, holds a controlling stake in an operating company

77
New cards

Private Benefits of Control (PBC)

The gain resulting from exercising control for controlling shareholders at the expense of noncontrolling shareholders

78
New cards

Tunneling

The transfer of resources out of a company to its controlling shareholder

  • At the expense of minority shareholders

  • Blockholders can use the firm’s funds for their own gains

79
New cards

Cumulative Voting

knowt flashcard image

With cumulative voting, votes are collected for all directors that can be elected, and shareholders can distribute their votes in any manner they choose

Cumulative voting example:

  • 100 votes in total

  • A has 60 votes

  • B has 40 votes

  • 3 Directors up for election

  • So A has 180 votes in total and B 120 votes

  • A can choose 2 directors and B can choose 1

80
New cards

Slate voting

A slate is a group of candidates that run in multi-seat or multi-position elections on a common platform (all are members of a political party or have the same policies)

81
New cards

Trusteeship Strategy: Independent Directors

  • Originated in the US

  • Seeks to remove conflicts of interests ex ante

  • Do not profit from opportunistic behaviour

  • Not tied by financial incentives but motivated by ethical and reputational concerns

82
New cards

Criticism against the trusteeship strategy of independent directors

  • Arbitrary criteria

  • No conclusive evidence on the effect on firm performance

  • Their role during the financial crisis has been criticised

83
New cards

Shareholders are the owners of the company. True or False

True, but it depends on what you call ownership. They have capital and control rights. That together constitutes the ownership that shareholders have. It is different than the type of ownership you have of an object

84
New cards

The Dodd-Frank Act

Granted the SEC the power to make rules facilitating the inclusion of shareholder nominations in the corporate proxy materials. Leading to the SEC adopting rule 14a-11

85
New cards

Rule 14a-11

The Rule holds that a shareholder (or shareholders jointly) holding 3% of the voting share capital for 3 years can include its own nominees with the company’s proxy materials

In 2011, the D.C. Circuit ruled against this rule. But shareholders may still file shareholder proposals seeking proxy access, which are non-binding