1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
reiner - myth of meritocracy
according to reiner, the media displays people with materialistic wealth and nobody questions where theyre money comes from
we assume that we can achieve these means through meritocracy
those who are wealthy are viewed as deserving of their wealth
e.j steve jobs or elon musk
this is maintaining a false cass consciousness that discourages any questions about capitalism and the gap between the rich and poor
this then leads the poor in thinking they can achieve this social mobility
they belive that social class and position is deserved and meritocratic
therefore media creates trad social class persp: the rich are deserving while the poor arent
narin
royal family are represented positively
even if there are negative stories or controversial actions taken by royal family members they are quickly replaced with positive ones
Nairn found that the royal family are shown as a concept which equates to niceness, decency and ordinariness
for example the queen is seen as ‘like us, but not like us,
(e.g. as fulfilling normal role such as a grandmother but also does extraordinary things)
royal families life’s constitute something of a soap opera
for example, royal events such as weddings and funerals are national events or public holidays
an obsession with the royal family developed after the second world war
clancy
her research analysed the royal correspondents whose job it is to get access to the royalty and create their media coverage
clancey used in-depth interviews with the royal correspondents and found these were people who are drawn from those who have appropiate capital to get access to the royal family
as royalty is surrounded by secrecy, getting access means their coverage rarely would disturb ideological bases of monarchial power
clancy argues this leads to them reproducing power of the monarchial institution
whilst other journalists and interviewers do write about the monarchy they are often seen as an outsider , especially if they write negatively , and then may bot be allowed to royal events again
golding and middleton
the media generated moral panics about working class people
they only make the news when its about crime, sex or fraud and this is to create moral panic and to further stigma against them
two categories the poor are presented in : deserving poor who get treated as victims and undeserving poor -as welfare cheats and criminals
their findings stated that by demonising those on benefits,it made it easier for the government to make back spending cuts on welfare
this creates a negative identity , as benefit scroungers or people to be pitied
owen jones
working class are demnised in the media
talks about chavtainment where the suffering of the working class becomes mass entertainment to be laughed at
examples such as the jeremy kyle show that goes on to inquire about biological dads of single mothers
the working class and underclass are seen as a joke
they are being shown as the scum of the earth
given a negative label as chavs
price
uses the example of benefits street to highlights the existence of poverty porn , where media representations of the underclass are purposely exaggerated to have a shocking effect on the audience
he explains that representation is frequently missed by viewers and is deliberately presented with goal that audiences interpret it as aspects of lower-class culture that usually is stigmatised or comdemned by hard working middle /upper class families
he used discorse analysis and ideas from hall to argue that benefit street is intended to be decoded by its audience as a portrayal of those aspects of lower class culture that ought to be condemmed by hard working class families
he also argued that the narratives in benefits street have a human and poignant quality, often presenting decent and compassionate people disenfranchised by an unfair society
he argues that these more empathetic aspects of the representation are frequently missed by viewers and political commentators
dood and dodd
elements of realism are beginning to be represented in working class characters in shows such as eastenders , where this soap opera portrays real problems such as ‘unemployment,imprisonment,rape,drugs,alcoholism,attempted suicide,crime,murder,homosexuality,infidelity,divorce,aids,abortion,ageing and death’ as opposed to previous shows such as coronation street
therefore there has been a shift /change from using the working class as entertainment in a negative way to highlighting the negative day to day experiences faced by many working class individuals in contemporary society
examples of the royal family
representations of the upper class have changed overtime through the media portrayals of the royal family
we can argue that traditionally, the royal family have been presented positively due to them being part of the bourgeosie and the upper class
also because media owners are also upper class an are likely to represent them positively
however negative stories have come out about the royal family, being presented by the public
negative stories of the royal family
an eample of this was when prince andrew was outed for having a freindship with jeffrey epstein (a convicted child offender) and sexual assault accusations
this shows a change of media representations of social class because he was seen as a powerful , upper-class white-british man who usually is seen as important and positive but him and other upper-class people are now being exposed for their wrong doings on the media
prince charles
lobbying of government ministers and civil servants in which he was reported as having met with gov ministers 36 times since 2010
this was described as inappropiate and unwise since the prince is supposed to adpot a neutral attitude towards government policy
his meetings were assumed to have involved giving advice to government or questioning government ideas
other evidence suggests that such critisism is not sustained but is balanced by positive portrayal of prince charles charitable works
overall evidence indicates that little long-term attention is given to critisism of the royal family or to questioning their role
research into media representations of the royal family would seem to provide evidence of both continuity and some change
daily mail middle class bias
the daily mail telegraph and newspapers are seen as focusing on the tastes ideas and concerns of the middle classes (sometimes referred to as middle england)
portrayed as educated and successful and able to cope with lifes problems
marxists argue that these characterisations serve to promote ruling class ideology
marxists believe that such media representations of the middle class reinforce a type of ‘false class conciousness’ in which people who are successful are seen as hardworking and deserving of their success rather than as a result of unequal life chances
pluralists and middle class
argue that media representations of the middle classes accurately reflect the way that media consumers perceive their society
researh into media portrayals of the middle classes finds little evidence of changing representations
this may be because media professionals themselves tend to come from the middle classes and also because this social class group is often regarded as stable and relatively conservative
newman
argues that there are very few sitcoms , films or television dramas that concentrate realistically on the everyday lives of working class people
this is in spite of the fact that this group comprises a numerically significant and important section of society
he points out that when working class people are portrayed, they are often cast in an unflattering or pitying light
devereux
argues that working class people are seen as falling into two main categories
the deserving and undeserving poor that contrasts with the negative images of those on welfare benefits
realistic point of view of the working class : inclusion of a young man names ricky thompsom who,as a young man, was heavily involved in trade unions and working class politics - this can be seen as positive portrayal of working class culture that is not simply a negative stereotype or nostalgia but is an attempt at a more realistic point of view
neo marxists and meritocracy
the portrayal of meritocracy is seen by neo-Marxists as evidence that such media representations of an effort to maintain ‘false class consciousness’ that discourages critical examination of why some people have enormous wealth and other remain poor and why some people in society seem more able to access private schools such as Cambridge or oxford and others seem unable to thrive in education in spite of their own intelligence and ability.