1/92
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Consensus Perspective: Main ideas
Criminal law reflects society’s consensus about what is morally right and wrong
Criminal law is a self-evident reflection of agreed upon morals and values
Certain behaviors are criminal because society has come to a consensus that they are morally wrong, threaten the social order; and should be punished
Consensus Perspective: Social Contract Theory
Enlightenment Movement (1500s-1700s)
Cultural and political movement emphasizing scientific reasoning over superstition, religion and tradition
Foundation of Liberalism
Individual liberty, equality before the law, religious tolerance, natural rights
Liberalism: From subjects to citizens
Subjects are under the power of a monarch or dictator
Loyalty and obedience in exchange for protection
Citizens possess power as a self-governing community
Obligation to actively participate in self-governance as equals
Social Contract Theory
Individuals must relinquish some of their freedom to the state exchange for security and social order
Without a strong state to enforce the law, society would devolve into anarchy
The state exists to protect the rights of individuals
Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) (Consensus Perspective)
English political philosopher
What makes a government legitimate?
Why should people obey their rulers?
Author of Leviathan (1651)
Foundational work of social contract theory
Hobbes’s view of human nature
Humans are inherently selfish and violent
Without a strong government to provide protection, society will descend into anarchy: a “war of all against all”
Life would be “nasty, brutish, and short”
Absolute government authority is more important than individual rights
The government’s main job is to control crime
Conclusion - agreement between citizens and the government, citizens submit to government authority in exchange for protection
John Locke (1632-1704) (Consensus Perspective)
English political philosopher
Author of Two Treatises of Government (1690)
“Father of Liberalism”
Locke’s Social Contract Theory
Humans possess inherent “natural rights”
Freedom, equality, self-determination
A nation’s government requires the consent of citizens in order to be seen as legitimate
Citizens agree to surrender absolute freedom in exchange for protection and security
But, if the government unjustly threatens citizens’ lives, citizens no longer have to abide by the government's authority
Conclusion - individual rights and limited government, if governments fail to protect individual rights, they are no longer legitimate, individual rights are more important that absolute government power
The government's main job is to protect citizens from arbitrary punishment
Consensus Perspective: Sociological Theory: Emile Durkheim (1858-1917)
How do societies create and maintain social solidarity?
Relationships that bind people together into unified group
Sense of shared purpose and belonging
Mutual trust, interdependence, and cooperation
What explains social order and stability?
What prevents complex, modern societies from devolving into chaos and anarchy?
Punishment’s primary function is to reinforce social solidarity
Public rituals to re-affirms collective values
Collective outrage against offenders reinforces in-group solidarity
Public ceremonies of punishment
Brings the public together in a shared space
Communicates shared values and identity
Reinforces boundaries between insiders and outsiders
Conflict Perspective (Main ideas)
Criminal law reflects the interest of the ruling class
The ruling class uses criminal law to maintain the power and privilege over subordinate groups
Ruling elites use law to protect their advantages, control political and economic resources, and repress social change
Jean-Jacques Rousseau (conflict perspective)
Humans are inherently cooperative
Humans are driven by self-preservation and can only survive in nature through cooperation
Humans are driven to violence through resource scarcity and inequality
The role of government is to grant security by removing the root sources of conflict
The main job of government is to provide economic security and reduce inequality
Punishment and Political Economy (Karl Marx (1818-1883))
German philosopher
Theory of Historical Materialism
Human behavior and history are determined by economic (material) forces
Economic development and class struggle determine the course of human history
Human behavior is driven by class interests
Focus on understanding and critiquing capitalism
Capitalism in fundamentally a system of exploitation
The capitalist class (Bourgeoisie) gets rich by underplaying the working class (Proletariat) for their labor
Criminal law upholds the status quo of capitalist exploitation
Threat of punishment ensures the working class will accept their place as exploitable workers
Controls the disorders created by unemployed masses
Capitalist Class (bourgeoisie)
Own society’s means of production (factories, machines, property, raw material, software etc)
Accumulate profit, wealth, and political power through exploitation of workers
Class Interests:
Perpetual profit growth
Maximize profits by minimizing labor costs
Pay workers less than the value of their labor
Prevent workers from demanding better conditions
Working Class (proletariat)
Must sell their labor to capitalists for a wage in order to survive
Must constantly work to ensure daily survival
Class Interests:
Form unions to demand better wages and working conditions
Create collective ownership of the means of production
Law serves the interest of the capitalist class
Law upholds the status quo of capitalist exploitation
Protects private ownership of the means of production
Allows capitalists to set low wages via “freedom” of contractual relationships
Criminal Law upholds the social order
Threat of punishment ensures the working class will accept their place as exploitable workers
Controls the disorder created by the unemployed masses
Crime Control Model of Criminal Justice
The repression of crime is the most important function of government
The emphasis is on the rapid arrest, charging, conviction, and sentencing of the guilty
Limiting the appeals process in order to remove antisocial individuals from society
Retribution
= Social revenge
“Just deserts” - punishment of lawbreakers should match the harm inflicted on the victim and society
“An eye for an eye”
The severity of punishment is proportionate to the harm of the offense
Conception of Lawbreakers
Rational actors who freely choose to engage in criminal behavior
Lawbreakers freely choose to harm other
Therefore, they deserve to experience harm themselves
Strategy of crime control
None; offenders simply deserve to be punished in proportion to the harm they caused
The victim and society deserve the satisfaction of seeing lawbreakers suffer
Balance the scales of justice
Deterrence
= Prevention of future crime
The costs of punishment must outweigh the benefits of crime
Specific Deterrence: the pain of punishment dissuades offenders from engaging in crime again
“Pains of imprisonment”: social isolation
General Deterrence: the general public knows that punishment is painful and will obey the law to avoid punishment
Conception of offenders
Rational actors who engage in cost-benefit calculations
Law breakers choose crime when the benefits of crime outweigh the costs
Strategy of Crime Control
Instill fear in lawbreakers and the public at large
Disincentivize crime by making the costs of crime outweigh the benefits
Make punishment certain, swift, severe, and proportionate to the crime
Incapacitation
= Social Defense
Isolate lawbreakers away from the community
Lawbreakers cannot victimize law abiding citizens while incarcerated
Strategy of Crime Control
Long-term prison sentences
Death penalty
Stresses the need for protecting suspects against the power of police, prosecutors, and judges
Detailed procedures are viewed as the best protection against human error, mistreatment, corruption, and false convictions
Speed and efficiency are sacrificed in the interest of protecting individuals’ rights, providing equal treatment, and ensuring reliable results
Due process
= the procedural rules that govern the manner in which the state may go about depriving an individual of his or her liberty
Balancing the rights of individuals with the authority of the state of enforce laws
due process in Constitution
4th amendment: Prohibition against unlawful search and seizure
5th amendment: Prohibition against self incrimination
6th amendment: right to trial
Speedy trial
Public trial
Impartial jury of peers
Trial in location where crime was committed
Right to be informed of the nature and cause of accusation
Right to confront witnesses
Right to compel witness to testify in defendants favor
Right to assistance of counsel
8th amendment: prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment
14th amendment: No state shall… deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law
Adversarial system
Trials are zero-sum contests between the individual and the state
Careful determination of facts based on relevant rules
Focus on procedural fairness
The state must run through an “obstacle course” to prove guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt”
Due Process Goals Overall Main Idea
Create safeguards to protect individuals rights and limit government power
Due Process Goals
Decriminalization
Diversion
Decarceration
Rehabilitation
Decriminalization
limit arrests and prosecution for low-level offenses
Diversion
redirect low-level offenders to community-based rehabilitation programs
Decarceration
early release for nonviolent offenders and limited use of incarceration for nonviolent offense
Rehabilitation
transform lawbreakers into productive citizens through training and therapy
Restore lawbreakers to "healthy" and “normal” social life
Conception of Offenders
People who require help and will respond to treatment and programming
Strategy of Crime Control
Prevent recidivism by transforming lawbreakers into law abiding citizens
Correct destructive attitudes and behaviors, esp addiction and mental health
Addresses socio-economic disadvantaged, esp unemployment and homelessness
3 Branches of Government
Legislative (makes laws)
Executive (carries out laws)
Judicial (evaluates laws)
U.S. Legal System
Federal Courts
Dual Court System
Jurisdiction of Federal Courts
Federal Courts
Article 3 of the Constitution created a single Supreme Court and left it to Congress to fill in the details of a national judicial system
Judiciary Act of 1789 created a separate system of thirteen federal district courts
Dual Court System
Federal system based on the U.S. Constitution and statutes passed by Congress
State system based on state constitutions and statutes passed by state legislatures
Jurisdiction of Federal Courts
Cases in which the United States is a party
Cases involving a law passed by the U.S. Congress
Cases raising Constitutional issues
Cases requiring the interpretation of international treaties
Levels of system (by order sorted lowest to highest)
District Courts
Courts of Appeal
Supreme Court
Nine justices
State Court System
98% of all cases are filed in state courts
Traffic, civil and criminal cases, domestic relations, and juvenile cases
Civil Law
= Private Disputes between individual citizens
Plaintiff (harmed party) vs. Defendant (responsible party)
Fam disputes - divorce, custody, will)
Contract disputes - such as a worker who thinks their employer violated their terms of employment)
Trusts - financial contracts)
Torts - complaints about harm from the defendant’s actions or inspections
Criminal Law
= Violation of the criminal law
The state (prosecutor) vs. Citizen (Defendant)
Characteristics of Criminal Law
Politicality- crime is a function of formal state law;only violations of rules made by the state are crimes
Specificity- criminal behavior is strictly defined as a specific and discrete act
Uniformity- criminal law applies to all citizens equally and does not make distinctions based on social status; a crime is a crime no matter who perpetrates it
Penal sanction -violators of criminal law will be punished by the state. Punishment is rational and civilized (i.e. not excessively violent or causing undue bodily harm)
Legal Elements of Crime
Criminal Intent (Mens Rea)
criminal Motive
Criminal Act (Actus Reus)
Criminal Intent (Mens Rea)
Intention to commit the behavior that resulted in the crime (‘guilty mind’)
Intention to commit the behavior and may not be the intention to commit the actual outcome
Ex: killing a pedestrian while driving drunk
Intention to commit the crime of DUI makes you responsible for other outcomes
4 levels of intent
Purposeful
Knowing
Reckless
Negligence
All of the other kinds of action and this one lack of action (ex. Child neglect)
Criminal Motive
Cause or reason why the act was committed
Criminal Act (Actus Reus)
Intentional or reckless action or inaction that brings about harmful consequences (‘guilty act’)
Voluntary bodily movement
Omission in the face of a duty to act
Possession
Legal Elements of Crime
Felony
misdemeanor
infraction
Felony
Serious crimes that typically carry more than one year of incarceration
Misdemeanor
Less serious crimes that typically carry less than one year of incarceration (if at all)
Infraction
Non-criminal violations of the law (traffic violations, noise ordinances, etc.)
Criminal Defenses
Excuse defenses
Justification defenses
Excuse defenses
Age - due to the defendants’ young age, they were not able to form the sufficient mens rea to be culpable for their actions
Involuntary intoxication - defendant was forced or tricked into getting drunk or high
Mistakes of fact - defendant thought they were actually doing something perfectly legal due to mistaken facts (ex. Picking up someone else’s phone)
Entrapment - the police or another government authority led the defendant to commit a crime that the defendant otherwise would have not committed
Insanity - at the time of the crime, the defendant was in such a mentally impaired state they they would not tell right from wrong (therefore being unable to form the sufficient mens rea)
Justification Defenses
Duress - defendant was coerced into committing the crime
Forced to commit the crime at gun point
Necessity - crime was for a significant, necessary purpose
Stealing a car to flee a tornado
Consent - the victim voluntarily consented to the activity
Loser of a boxing match presses charges for assault
Self defense - defendant had to commit the act in order to protect themselves or others from a “reasonable and imminent threat of violence”
Reasonable: use of force was proportional
Imminent: violence was likely to immediately follow
Criminal Justice Process
Each step of the process depends on the discretion of criminal justice actors
Discretion
ability to make independent decisions
Which calls get priority, which cases are investigated, who gets arrested, who gets charged, who gets a long sentence, who gets early release
Entry into the system
Police
gatekeepers of the criminal justice system
Decide which calls for service get responded to, which cases to investigate, who to arrest
No entry into the system if…
Police do not respond to a call
Case goes old (no suspect identified)
Case gets dropped (suspect is cleared)
Prosecution and pretrial services
Prosecutors
most powerful gatekeepers of the criminal justice system
Power to file charges or drop the case
Little oversight or accountability
No entry to the system if…
Not enough evidence
Police conducted an illegal search
No reason at all
Initial court appearance
Judge informs the suspect of the charges against them
Informed of due process rights
Bail may be set
Preliminary hearing
Judge examines the evidence against the defendant
Determines if there is sufficient probable cause
Reasonably trustworthy evidence that the defendant committed the specific criminal act
The case is dismissed if…
Police did not have sufficient probable cause to make the arrest
Prosecutor does not have sufficient evidence to demonstrate probable cause
Case proceeds to bail or detention hearing if there is sufficient probable cause
grand jury
in some states, prosecutors must present evidence to a grand jury to determine if there is sufficient evidence
if the grand jury agrees with the prosecution, they issue an indictment
Adjudication
Arraignment
defendant is read the charge, advised of their rights to a defense attorney, and told to enter plea
guilty
not guilty
no contest: defendant accepts the penalty but does not admit guilt
Plea Bargaining
prosecution and the defense work out a deal to grant the defendant a lesser penalty in exchange for pleading guilty
98% of cases are adjudicated via plea bargain
“Assembly line” rather than "obstacle course”
“The Process is the Punishment”
The adjudication process is so burdensome that defendants forgo their due process rights and enter guilty pleas
Stuck in jail during adjudication process
Missed work
Missed wages
No child care
Sentencing
Presumptive sentence: recommended sentence based on sentencing guidelines
Mandatory minimum
Judges may not impose a sentence below a minimum threshold
Judicial discretion and departures
Upward departure: higher sentence due to aggravating circumstances
Increase blame: cruelty, weapon used, vulnerable victim, leadership role, hate crime motivation, abuse of trust
Downward departure: lower sentence due to mitigating circumstances
Decrease blame: age, mental illness, minor role, duress, remorse, severe childhood trauma
Jail
funded and administered by local counties governments
550,000 residents on any given
7-10 million admissions per year
Designed for short-term detention
People awaiting trial (pre-trial detention)
80% of jail inmates are “innocent until proven guilty”
People convicted of felonies and sentenced to less than 1 year
20% have been convicted on a felony
Prison
funded and administered by state governments and the Federal Bureau of Prisons
1,071,00 residents on any given day
469,000 admissions in 2022
Designed for long term detention
People convicted of felonies and serving sentences of at least 1 year
Average sentence for people serving non-life terms: 5 years
Community Corrections
Probation and parole
Common conditions of probation and parole:
Pay fines and fees
Drug testing
Full-time employment or school
Movement and travel restrictions
Relationship or “association” restrictions
Random searches
Probation
Convicted person can live in the community under the supervision of a probation officer and follow certain conditions
Parole
person is released from prison early and completes their sentence under the supervision of a parole officer
Criminology
the study of why people engage in criminal or antisocial behavior
Why do people break the law?
How can we prevent people from breaking the law?
How can we protect society from lawbreakers?
How can we correct the behavior of lawbreakers?
Multiple Theories of Crime Causation
Individualistic Theories
micro-sociological
macro-sociological
Theory
well tested explanation of a behavior that can be used to predict future behavior
Individualistic Theories
“Kinds of People”
Biological traits” physiological and genetic explanations
Micro-sociological
“Kind of Relationships”
Social relationships: influence of peer groups and families
Macro-sociological
“Kinds of Places”
Social ecologies: neighborhoods, political economy of society
Pre-Modern Criminology
Religious and supernatural explanations for crime
Crime caused by demonic possession and evil spirits
Classical Criminology
Cesare Beccaria - On Crimes and Punishment (1764)
Jeremy Bentham - An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789)
Criminal behavior is a rational choice
People commit crime when the benefit is greater than the cost
If punishment is swift, severe, and certain, people will be deterred from committing crime
Punishment should be proportional to the crime
The criminal justice system should not be arbitrary, and laws should be known to the public
Determinism (late 1800s to early 1900s)
A body of theories that reject the “free will” conception of human nature
Human behavior is determined by factors outside of individual control
Biology
Psychology
Social environment
Biological Determinism
Cesare Lombroso - 19th C. Italian Physician
Criminal Man (1876)
Criminals are biologically distinct from non-criminals
Criminals are atavistic - they are genetically inferior and physically distinct species of humans
Remnants of earlier stages of human development
Hairy bodies, curly hair, receding foreheads, long arms, large skulls, nostrils, and ears
Common among “colored races”
Pseudoscience
Misapplies scientific language to support a biased argument
Scientific racism: using “science” to justify white supremacy
Confirmation bias
Only studied people who are incarcerated
Biological determinism
eugenics
Contemporary biosocial theory
Biology does not fully explain criminal behavior
Biology operates in conjunction with other influence
Focus on gene-environment interactions
Certain genetic predispositions can be triggered by environmental factors
E.g. predisposition to addiction or mental illness exacerbated by adverse social conditions
Brain damage
psychological determinism
social psychological theories of crime
Brain damage
Damage to the pre-frontal cortex lobe of the brain
Governs functions of emotional regulation, foresight, and moral judgement
Traumatic brain injury, substance abuse, birth defects, toxic exposure, poor diet in infancy
Toxic lead exposure
CTE
Psychological determinism
Also assumes that criminals are fundamentally different than non criminals
Defects in mental, emotional, personality traits cause criminal acts
Personality and crime
Psychopaths and sociopaths
Lack of impulse control coupled with lacking the capacity to experience guilt, empathy, caring, or obligations to other
Critique: these conditions are incredibly rare and difficult to diagnose
Social psychological theories of crime
Criminal behavior is the result of exposure to negative environmental conditions
Anyone could become a criminal if exposed to the wrong environment
Focus on how social interaction shapes individual behavior
How human behavior changes and adapts to different social situations
How do individuals learn to favor or disfavor criminal behavior?
How do social relationships (peers, family) shape attitudes toward criminal behavior?
Social learning theory
Criminal behavior is not caused by biological, psychological or moral pathologies
Criminal behavior is learned, not inherited
Learning occurs in social interactions with deviant peers
What gets taught?
Motivations
Attitudes, ideas, beliefs, and values toward crime
Fit in with friends
Rebel against authority
Fun, thrilling, and empowering
Easy way to get money
Techniques: in order to commit a crime, and individual must first learn how to do it
The “know-how” of criminal behavior
Example: theft
What would you need to know in order to be a successful thief?
How to break into a house/car, picking locks, shutting down alarms, how to “fence” a stolen item, knowing the best time to strike, avoid the police, how to pickpocket undetected
Getting high is a learned practice
Learning to smoke in a way that produces real effects
Learning to recognize the effects of marijuana and connect them with drug use
Learning to enjoy the sensations
Differential association
Criminal behavior occurs when there is an excess of definitions favorable to the violation of law over definitions unfavorable to the violation of law
Criminal behavior occurs when individuals become isolated from non-criminal peer groups
Immersed in situations that define violations of the law as favorable
Peer pressure
Macro-sociological theories
Focus on “social ecology”
Spatial organization and distribution of resource in a place
Organizations of cities
Levels of poverty and inequality
Built environment of a neighborhood
Social network of local residents
What explains the geographic concentration of crime in certain areas of the city over time
Social Disorganization theory
“Chicago School” of Criminology
Groups of University of Chicago sociologists studying the problems associated with rapid social change at the start of the 1900s
Urbanization, industrialization, immigration
Crime is caused by the social ecology of neighborhoods, not the cultural or moral pathologies of residents
Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas (1942) by Clifford R. Shaw and Henry D. Mckay
Mapped the addresses of arrested delinquents from 1920-1950s
Areas of high crime remained stable regardless of population turnover
Ethnic groups who left high crime areas committed less crime
Ethnic groups that entered high crime areas committed more crime
Spatial approach to studying violence
community-level factors drive violence
Histories of racial segregation create…
Divestment from public infrastructure
Concentrated poverty
Weak social cohesion and trust
Taken together, these factors increase the risk of neighborhood violence
Concentrated Disadvantage and violence
Decay of the built environment
Decline of political influence and state funding = deterioration of public infrastructure
Built environment decays, poorly lit spaces, abandoned buildings, vacant lots, litter and graffiti, lack of public transit and food traffic (places where violence is most likely)
Residents retreat from public space, leading to further decay
Schools, daycare centers, parks, playgrounds, libraries close or deteriorate
Measuring Crime
How do we know how much crime there is in society?
Where does that information come from and how is it protected
How reliable and valid is that information
Why does having accurate crime data matter?
3 sources of crime statistics
Uniform Crime Report (UCR) / National Incident Based Reporting System (NIBRS)
National Crime Victims Survey (NCVS)
Report Studies
Uniform Crime Report (UCR)
The most widely used official source of data regarding criminal offenses in the United States
Annual report compiled by the FBI based on reports from nearly all local law enforcement agencies in the US
Published from 1930-2019
The Crime Rate
Measures the amount of crime relative to the size of the population
Crime rate = (number of reported crimes/total population) x 100,000
Example: city with 50,000 residents has 250 reported thefts
(250/50,000) x 100,000 = 500 thefts per 100,000 residents
Clearance rates
The clearance rate is a measure of “solved” crimes
Dividing the number of reports for each Index crime by the number of arrests for that crime
Note that it focuses on arrest, not conviction
UCR Part 1 Offenses or Index Crimes
Violent index crimes (crimes against persons)
murder/non-negligent homicide
Rape
Aggravated assault
Armed robbery
Property index crimes (crimes against property)
Larceny-theft
Burglary
Motor-vehicle theft
Arson
Data on Index Crimes are the ones most often cited in media reports and public discussions about how much crime is occurring in society
UCR Part 2 Offenses or non-index crimes
20 (mostly non-violent) categories of violations
Drug abuse violations; prostitution; simple assault; public order offenses; status offenses
UCR Strengths and Weaknesses
Strengths
Relatively valid and reliable sources of data on what police and citizens …
Weaknesses
Non-reporting - a crime occurs, citizens may not report it for a number of reasons:
They may not know that the behavior is criminal
They may not consider the behavior to be criminal
They may distrust the police and feel that the problem is better handled privately
They may not know the perpetrator and be unwilling to turn them in
Violence against women, particularly rape and domestic battery, are two of the most under-reported crimes. Why?
Victims feel humiliated and embarrassed
Fear further violence or retaliation by the offender
Fear they won't be believed
National Incident Based Reporting System (NIBRS)
New system of crime reporting as of Jan. 1 2021
Provides more detailed data on crime incidents in the U.S.
Changes from the UCR
Eliminated UCR’s “hierarchy rule” (only recording most serious offenses
Records separate crimes within the same incident
Example: bank robbery where guard is murdered - in the UCR only the murder is recorded - in NIBRS both the robbery and the murder are recorded
Expanded offense categories
Group A offenses
Maintains Part 1 and 2 categories
Adds 28 expanded offense categories
Group B offenses
Recorded detailed information about each incident
Age, sex, race/ethnicity of both victim and offender(s) (if known)
Relationship between victim and offender(s)
Date, time, and location of the incident
Type and value of property stolen
Weapons used
Any injuries
Implementation problems
Agencies weren’t prepared for extra work of new system
63% of police agencies submitted data in 2021
82.3% police agencies submitted data in 2022
National Crime Victims Survey (NCVS)
NCVS: was developed by the Bureau of Justice Statistics in the 1960s to address the problems of underreporting in the UCR
Draws on a random, nationally representative sample of households and business in the US
Every surveys 163,000 individuals from 92,000 households
Phone or in person interviews
NCVS Strengths and Weaknesses
Strengths
Provides a reliable alternative source of crime data
Identifies crime not reported to the police
Weaknesses
Until 1992, no specific questions about rape
Pre-1992: did anyone TRY to attack you in some other way?
Survey redesign alone accounted for doubling in reported rapes
Victims of rape or domestic battery may be surveyed while their assailant is in the room (if spouse or partner)
Interviewer effects
Interviewers may be better or worse at eliciting responses from respondents
Sampling bias
Victim surveys seek a general sample of the population
Omits the homeless and institutionalized populations
Disproportionately victims of violence
Response bias
Refers to a situation when an interviewer knowingly or unknowingly reports inaccurate information in an interview
Crime victims may be uncomfortable recounting their victimization
Crime victims may not recall their victimization
Crime victims may classify crimes differently (or not at all) compared to the police
Crime victims may report a trivial event as a serious crime
Report Studies
Self-report surveys are primarily interested in obtaining information about respondents’ own delinquents and criminal behavior
Mostly conducted with adolescents and often administered in school settings
Focus on a wider range of less serious behaviors that remain outside the domain of official records
Drug use, underage drinking, sexual activity, truancy
The National Survey of Youth (NSY)
Surveys a nationally representative sample of adolescents in the US
Drug surveys
Monitoring the Future (MTF)
Annual nationally representative survey of high school seniors
Report Studies Weaknesses
Social desirability: not reporting criminal behavior out of fear of being judged
Telescoping: wrongly reporting the time when a crime occurred
Forgetting: not remembering that a crime occured
Under and over reporting