Role of PACs and Super PACs for electoral finance

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/7

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

8 Terms

1
New cards

what is hard money?

donations to a particular candidate, more regulated by the Federal Election Commission (FEC)

2
New cards

what is soft money?

money which is given to a political party or political action committee (PAC) but is not used for the election of a specific candidates, no limits on contributions

3
New cards

what are independent expenditures?

money spent on campaigning toe elect or defeat a candidate but is independent of any political candidate or party - a type of soft money

pressure groups are able to make unlimited independent expenditures

4
New cards

PAC

political action committee → raises money for the diect purpose of electing/ defeating candidates, for supporting other political campaigns for legislation or initiatives

conations to a PAC are limited to $5000 per donation a year

5
New cards

Super PAC

a type of political action committee which deals only independent expenditures

Super PACs can raise and spend unlimited amounts of money for political campagining but dont donate directly to candidates/ parties

6
New cards

What did the landmark SC case in Citizens united v Federal Election Commission (2010) do?

  • court ruled that the 1st amendment of right to free speech applies to unions and PGs

    • so the Court’s decision allowed PGs and corporations to spend an unlimited amount on political campainging

    • created the SUPERPAC → they can raise and spend an unlimited amount on independent expenditures to campaign for or against political campaigns

7
New cards

examples of unlimited spending of Super PACS

  • in 2020 election → Super PACS spent £1.8 billion

  • however doesn’t always lead to political success:

    • Super PACs spent $215 million for Clinton while $85.5 million for Trump and Trump was successful

8
New cards

no- PACs and Super PACs have too much influence in US elections

  • USA is supposed to be pluralist society so PGs must be able to fully partipate in election campaings

  • PGs represent a broad range of issues

  • large domations do not guarantee vistory e.g. Clinton v Trump