Explanations for forgetting - Retrieval failure

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/27

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

28 Terms

1
New cards

What is retrieval failure?

When you don't have the necessary cue to access the memory

2
New cards

What are the 2 explanations for forgetting?

Interference

Retrieval failure

3
New cards

Cues need to be the same when

memory encoded and memory retrieved

4
New cards

Why do we forget according to retrieval failure?

The cue for the memory when it was encoded is not same when retrieved

5
New cards

What are the 2 types of cues?

Context dependant

State dependant

6
New cards

What is a context dependant cue?

External cues

7
New cards

What is a state dependant cue?

Physical + emotional state when memory was encoded

8
New cards

Who did a study on context cues?

Godden + Baddeley (1975)

9
New cards

When did Godden + Baddeley research context cues?

1975

10
New cards

Who researched context cues in 1975?

Godden + Baddeley

11
New cards

What type of experiment was Godden + Baddeley (1975)?

Feild experiment

12
New cards

What was the aim of Godden + Baddeley (1975)?

Investigate if memory for words learnt and recalled in same environment was better than it in different environments

13
New cards

Method of Godden + Baddeley (1975)

-Divers learnt a list of words either on land or in water

-Asked to recall words either on land or water creating 4 conditions

14
New cards

How many conditions were there in Godden + Baddeley (1975)?

4

15
New cards

Findings of Godden + Baddeley (1975)

Accurate recall 40% lower in non-matching conditions

16
New cards

How much lower was recall in non-matching conditions of Godden + Baddeley (1975)?

40%

17
New cards

Conclusions of Godden + Baddeley (1975)

Recall was 40% lower in non-matching conditions because same cues weren't available

To remember info we have to recall info in same environment we learnt it

18
New cards

Who researched state dependant cues?

Carter + Cassaday (1998)

19
New cards

What did Carter + Cassaday (1998) study?

State dependant cues

20
New cards

When did Carter + Cassaday study state-dependent cues?

1998

21
New cards

What type of experiment was Carter + Cassaday (1998)?

Lab experiment

22
New cards

What was the aim of Carter + Cassaday (1998)?

Investigate whether being in a different psychological state has an impact on accuracy of memory

23
New cards

Carter + Cassaday (1998) method

1.Gave anti-histamines coz of their mild sedative effect to create a different psychological state

2. Ps had to learn list of words and prose then recall with 4 different conditions

24
New cards

What were the different conditions in Carter + Cassaday (1998)?

Learn on drug recall on drug

Learn on drug recall not on drug etc

25
New cards

How many conditions were there in Carter + Cassaday (1998)?

4

26
New cards

Why did Carter + Cassaday (1998) give the Ps anti-histamines?

Mild sedative effect to create a different psychological state

27
New cards

Findings of Carter + Cassaday (1998)

Mismatched internal states lead to significantly worse performance

28
New cards

Conclusion of Carter + Cassaday (1998)

Absent cues = more forgetting