CRJU 320 Research Methods Exam #1 (CSULB)

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
full-widthCall with Kai
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/77

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

78 Terms

1
New cards

What is Social Science?

The use of scientific methods to investigate individuals, societies, and social processes. This also includes the investigation of criminology and criminal justice.

2
New cards

Errors in Reasoning (4)

Over-generalization // Selective Observation // Inaccurate Observation // Illogical Reasoning

3
New cards

Over-generalization

Assuming that the truth of one case is truth for all other cases.

4
New cards

Selective Observation

Choosing to look at things that already align with our beliefs or hypotheses.

5
New cards

Inaccurate Observation

Misunderstanding an observation.

6
New cards

Illogical Reasoning

Making conclusions or failing to make conclusions based on invalid or illogical assumptions.

7
New cards

The Scientific Method

Attempts to reduce errors in logic.

Observe > Hypothesis > Test & Collect Data > Analyze Results > Accept or Reject Hypothesis.

8
New cards

Motivations for Research (3)

Policy // Academic // Personal

9
New cards

Types of Research (4)

Descriptive // Exploratory // Explanatory // Evaluation

10
New cards

Descriptive Research

Describes the characteristics of the phenomena. Answers the "what" and "how", not "why".

Methods: Reports or surveys.

11
New cards

Exploratory Research

Research conducted on a subject with little to know previous knowledge of the subject. Large amounts of unstructured data.

Methods: Qualitative interviews and observations.

12
New cards

Explanatory Research

Identify the causes and sources of phenomena. Answers the "why".

Methods: Experiments

13
New cards

Evaluation Research

Identifies the process and effectiveness of programs and interventions.

14
New cards

Quantitative

Focus of numbers and categories.

Methods: Surveys and experiments.

15
New cards

Qualitative

Focus on capturing social life.

Methods: Interviews, participant observation, focus groups.

16
New cards

Mixed Methods

Combines qualitative and quantitative methods to answer questions and understand phenomena.

Method: Triangulation, the application of several methods to one study.

17
New cards

Weaknesses of Research

Research never leads to absolute truth. It may answer some questions, but it will also lead to more questions.

Research does not always have the tools necessary to investigate the questions asked.

18
New cards

Research Questions

Question that can be answered through studies and data collection.

19
New cards

What makes a GOOD research question?

1. Is clear, simple, and manageable.

2. Feasible, can be studied and experimented on with reasonable ease.

3. Impactful and relevant to modern study.

4. Grounded in existing, relevant literature.

20
New cards

Theory

Set of interrelated propositions that attempt to explain an aspect of reality.

21
New cards

The relationship of theory and research

Theory is the source of many research questions. It is a guide to what a study might expect to find on a certain topic.

22
New cards

Deductive Reasoning

General to the specific. Applying a theory to data.

23
New cards

Inductive Reasoning

Specific to the general. Applying data to a theory.

24
New cards

Constant

Factor that does not change or vary in a study.

25
New cards

Variable

Factor that can change or vary in a study.

26
New cards

Dependent Variable

A variable that is expected to change under the influence of the independent variable.

27
New cards

Independent Variable

A variable that is expected to change another variable.

28
New cards

Hypothesis

A testable statement about the relationship between two or more variables. Derives from a research question.

29
New cards

Types of Validity (7)

Measurement // External // Causal // Face // Content // Criterion // Construct

30
New cards

Measurement Validity

When a measurement aligns with the expected calculations.

31
New cards

External Validity (Generalizability)

The extent to which the findings from your study can be applied outside of the study.

32
New cards

Causal Validity (Internal)

When the conclusion that A causes B is correct.

33
New cards

Face Validity

When a test/experiment is obviously relevant to the concept of the study.

34
New cards

Content Validity

The contents of a test cover the full range of a concept's meaning.

35
New cards

Criterion Validity

When a measure accurately compares to the outcome of another measure.

36
New cards

Construct Validity

When the study itself is relevant to the construct or theory it researches.

37
New cards

Types of Reliability (5)

Test-Retest // Inter-Item (Internal Consistency) // Alternate Forms // Split-Halves // Intra-Observer OR Inter-Observer.

38
New cards

Test-Retest Reliability

A measurement showing that measures of a phenomenon are highly correlated at two points in time.

39
New cards

Inter-Item Reliability

The correlation of multiple items used to measure a single concept.

40
New cards

Alternate Forms Reliability

Using different versions of the same question to test the reliability of the answers received.

41
New cards

Split Halves Reliability

Responses from two randomly selected halves of a sample are consistently similar.

42
New cards

Intra-Observer Reliability

Observation of different occasions of a study by ONE person.

43
New cards

Inter-Observer Reliability

Observation of ONE occasion of a study by MULTIPLE people.

44
New cards

The Relationship of Validity and Reliability

Both are improve the strength of a study. They do not go hand in hand. A measure can have one but lack the other. A good study should have both!

45
New cards

Research Ethics (3)

Informed Consent // Beneficence // Debriefing

46
New cards

Informed Consent

Research participants must be fully aware of all components of the research and legally and voluntarily agree to participate.

47
New cards

Beneficence

Weighing the harms and benefits of the study.

48
New cards

Debriefing

Explaining the experiment to the participants after the study, revealing all instances of deception (if used) and allowing the participants to ask questions.

49
New cards

Milgram Experiment

Study: Researchers had participants believe they were shocking an anonymous tester every time the tester answered a question wrong. Voltage would be increased every shock.

Problem: Unethical to have participants believe they were actually harming a person to the point of death. Mental strain and tension.

50
New cards

Tuskegee Syphilis Study

Study: U.S. Government allowed the spread of syphilis within a black community to observe if it affected blacks differently than whites.

Problem: They allowed hundreds to die for an answer that could have been found from only the first few deaths. Inherent racist tendencies as well.

51
New cards

Stanford Prison Experiment

Study: College students were voluntarily put into a prison simulation. Half were officers, half were prisoners. The 2-week long study ended in only the first 5 days after participants were experiencing cruel abuse and mental trauma.

Problem: Researchers allowed the participants to go too far.

52
New cards

Alice Goffman "On the Run" Study.

Study: Goffman lives in a well-known ghetto community for several years to study the people. She becomes apart of the community, and eventually takes part in a murder attempt against a gang that rivaled her friends.

Problem: Goffman committed the crime of attempted murder. She allowed her emotions and personal life to be ingrained within her observation-based professional study.

53
New cards

Conceptualization

Process of specifying what is meant by a term or idea.

54
New cards

Operationalization

Explaining the purpose of operations for a study.

55
New cards

Triangulation

Using multiple research methods for one study.

56
New cards

Levels of Measurement (4)

Nominal // Ordinal // Interval // Ratio

57
New cards

Nominal Measurement

Measuring by category or quality/attributes.

Ex. Grouping by gender, occupation, etc.

58
New cards

Ordinal Measurement

Measuring by order or rank.

Ex. 1st Place, Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree, etc.

59
New cards

Interval Measurement

Measuring by an interpretation of numbers and math. A zero value DOES represent something.

Ex. Temperature. 0 Degrees Fahrenheit does not mean an absence of temperature, it means freezing temperature.

60
New cards

Ratio Measurement

Measuring by fixed measuring units. Numbers are not interpreted, and zero values DO NOT represent anything.

Ex. Measurement of how many times I coughed in an hour.

61
New cards

Motivations for Reporting Research (3)

Advance Scientific Knowledge // Shape Social Policies // Organize Social Action.

62
New cards

Methods for Reporting Research (3)

Student Papers and Theses // Journal Articles // Applied Reports

63
New cards

Student Papers and Theses

Audience: A professor or committee of professors.

64
New cards

Journal Articles

Must go through the peer-review process.

Audience: Other academics and industry workers.

65
New cards

Applied Reports

Commissioned by government, corporation, or non-profit organization.

66
New cards

Other Methods for a General Public Audience.

Op-Eds // Non-academic articles // Ted-Talks // NPR and Media Interviews.

67
New cards

Sample

Subset of a larger population or group.

68
New cards

Population

A set of individuals we want to generalize our findings to.

69
New cards

Element

Individuals who make up a sample.

70
New cards

Enumeration Units

Units that contain one or more elements and are listed within the sampling frame. Used when a complete sampling frame is not available.

Ex. List of addresses rather than the names of all individuals living in a neighborhood.

71
New cards

Sampling Frame

List of all elements within a population.

72
New cards

Sampling Units

The units selected at each stage of a multi-stage sampling design.

Ex. Population: University Students

Enumeration Units: University Departments

Primary Sampling Units: Sample of University Departments

Secondary Sampling Units: Students from each Department.

73
New cards

Evaluating Samples

Samples should match the intended population of a study. Samples must be more concrete and explicit in order to have better generalizability.

74
New cards

Evaluating Generalizability (2 Types)

Sample Generalizability // Cross-Population Generalizability

75
New cards

Sample Generalizability

The ability to generalize from a sample to the population it represents.

76
New cards

Cross-Population Generalizability

The ability to generalize from one group or population to another.

77
New cards

3 Questions to Properly Assess Sample Quality

1. From what populations were the cases selected?

2. What method was used to select cases from this population?

3. Do the cases that are studied represent the population from which they were selected?

78
New cards

Representativeness

The degree to which a sample has the same proportion of characteristics as the population it represents.