1/108
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
NLI
Neurological level of injury
What is the most common region of the spine for an SCI
Cervical
The (higher/lower) the injury, the (more/less) the impairments
Higher; more
What parts of the nervous system are affected by an SCI
Motor
Sensory
Autonomic
What are the 4 types of spinal cord syndromes
Brown-sequard
Anterior
Posterior
Central
Brown-sequard lesion
Hemisection of the spinal cord
-Ipsilateral proprioception and vibration
-Contralateral pain and temp
Common causes of SCI
-Trauma
-Back surgery
-Patients who wait a long time from sx onset until seeking medical help
What is the most common cause of SCI
MVA
What population commonly gets an SCI from a fall
Geriatric
Does the cervical spine have adequate or poor mechanical stability
Poor
An injury to the cervical spine is (more/less) likely to result in cord damage
More
Cervical injuries account for __% of SCI
60
If a patient has damage to C1 and C2, are neuro deficits common? Why or why not
Usually have no neuro deficit due the C1 and C2 having an increased canal space
What vertebrae of the c-spine are especially susceptible to SCI
C5-C7
What forces at the c-spine usually cause SCI
Flexion, axial loading, distraction, and extension
-Can also be caused by rotation, lateral flexion, or shear
Thoracic injuries are (more/less) likely than cervical injuries and are more likely to me (complete/incomplete)
Less; complete
(Low/high) forces are often required to cause an SCI at the thoracic spine
High
Why are injuries at the thoracic spine considered to have less chance of motor or sensory return
Small vertebral foramen
Poor vascular supply of the upper thoracic spine
What level of the t-spine are common for SCI injury
T12-L1
What forces often cause injury to the t-spine
Flexion, axial loading, or a combo of flexion and rotation
Common causes of SCI at the thoracic spine
GSW
MVA
Falls
The lumbar spine is considered to have (low/intermediate/increased) stability
Intermediate
The lumbar spine is (more/less) flexible than the thoracic, and (more/less) than the cervical
More; less
What level is the caudal equina
Around L1/2
How is the caudal equina often damaged
Compression, stretching, avulsion, or tearing
What forces often cause injury at the lumbar spine
Flexion, axial loading, or flexion combines with distraction or rotation
Associated injuries with a traumatic SCI
Fractures
Pneumo/hemothorax
Head injury
Brachial plexus injury
Peripheral nerve injury
The spinal cord can sustain damage due to _________ injury, ________, or ______ ______
Vertebral; traction; direct insult
In both penetrating and non-penetrating injuries, the (more/less) severe the disruption of the spinal canal leads to more serve neuro damage
More
T/F: The spinal cord does not need to be severed for irreversible damage to occur
True
Non-traumatic causes of SCI
Spinal hematoma
Infection
Transverse myelitis
Radiation
Aortic aneurysm
Neoplasm
MS plaque in the SC
Primary injury
Neuronal damage caused by blunt trauma to the spinal cord
Secondary injury
Causes most of the damage to the cord affecting both neuronal and glial cells
How long does secondary injury last in SCI
Days to weeks to months after the initial injury
Longer that they las, the less function the pt tends to get back
As the primary and secondary reactions start to subside, the necrotic region of the spinal cord is replaced by ____ ______ _____ or ________
Scar tissue; cysts; cavities
Sx of spinal shock
LMN sx: areflexia/hyporeflexia, flaccidity, hypotonia
Predictors of neurological return after SCI
Degree of impairment
Preserved motor function and pin prick
Pattern of injury
Early return
Age (younger the better)
Neurological deterioration
Associated with secondary injuries; patient gets worse as time goes on after their SCI
Ex: AS, sepsis, bed bound
Discomplete injury
When, in chronic SCI, testing reveals a complete injury but neurophysiological testing reveals some remaining connectivity
Most neuro return after an SCI occurs _ to _ months post-injury
6;9
Pre-hospital care for Sci occurs where
The site of the injury
-Want to stabilize the spine
Fracture management for SCI
Non-surgical
Surgical
Spinal orthoses
Benefits of head cervical orthoses (HCO)
Semi-rigid and rigid plastics
Provide more rigid stabilization of the c-spine
Include occiput and chi to decrease ROM
Used in stable spine conditions
Complications of HCOs
-Supported chin and clavicle area are common areas for skin breakdown
-Long-term use associated with decreased muscle function and dependency
Structure of a Philadelphia collar
-Semi-rigid HCO with a 2-piece system of Plastazote foam
-Plastic struts ant and post for support
-Upper portion supports the lower jaw and occiput, lower portion cover upper thoracic region
-Difficult to clean
-Thoracic / can be added to increase motion restriction and treat C6-T2 injuries
What orthosis is the gold standard for HCOs
Miami J collar
Structure of Miami J collar
Semi-rigid 2-piece system made of polyethylene, with a soft, washable lining
Thoracic / can be added to increase support and treat C6-T2 injuries
Indications for a Miami J collar
Same as the Philadelphia collar
Why is it important to educate patients and their families about donning and doffing the Miami J
Needs to be tight around the neck in order to stabilize the C-spine
Cervical thoracic orthoses (CTOs) have (less or greater) motion restriction in the middle to lower cervical spine
Greater
Is it common to use CTOs with unstable fractures
Used minimally
What orthoses has the greatest reduction in cervical mobilization (~90-95%)
Halo cervical orthosis
Structure of halo cervical orthosis
Cranial ring escude to the skill using 4 metal pins
The ring attached by four metal bars to a plastic vest and is worn continuously
Function of the halo cervical orthosis
Provides distraction forces that aid in the stabilization and reducing the load of the head on the c-spine
Structure of Minerva orthosis
Thermoplastic custom orthosis
Encases the chin, posterior skill and extends down to the lower ribs
May extend to the pelvis
Headband holds skull in place
The Minerva orthosis is reported to have (better/worse) cervical stabilization compared to the halo (except at C1 and 2)
Better
Positives of using the Minerva orthosis
Allows good shoulder ROM - early mobilization
Fewer complications than the halo
Structure of the sternal-occipital-mandibular immobilizer (SOMI)
CTO with anterior chest plate extending to the aphid process and metal or plastic bars curve over the shoulder
Straps from the bars over the shoulder and cross to the opposite side of the anterior plate for fixation
2 poster CTOs start from the best plate and attach to the occipital component
Comfortable and proper adjustment is crucial for motion restriction
What population is the SOMI ideally used for
Bed bound patients because the orthsiss has no posterior rods
Indications for the SOMI
Controls flexion in the C1-3 segments better than a cervicothoracic brace
AA instability
Neural arch fractures of C2 (flexion causes instability)
Molded plastic body jacket structure
Fabricated with high-temperature copolymer plastics and is well fitted in order to restrict motion in all planes
Downside to molded plastic body jacket
Hot for the patient
Purpose of a molded plastic body jacket
Anterior and lateral trunk containment increases intra-cavitary press ion in the stomach and abdomen
Jewett structure
Prefabricated metal frame with suprapubic, sternal, and thoracolumbar pads
What motions are restricted and encouraged with the Jewett
Restricts flexion and encouraged hyperextension of the lower thoracic and upper lumbar spine
Some control of rotation and lateral flexion
Is the Jewett appropriate for a unstable spine
No
Knight Taylor orthosis structure
Rigid posterior frame with axillary straps and abdominal support
Requires cervical extension for motion restriction above T8
What motions are allowed and restricted with the Knight-Taylor orthosis
Effective restriction: lumbar fix/ext, lat fix; lumbosacral lat flx
Intermediate Restriction: Lumbar and lumbosacral rotation
Unrestricted: Lumbosacral flexion and extension
What systems can be affected by an SCI besides the neuro system
Urinary
Gastrointestinal
Cardiovascular
MSK
Elements of the ASIA exam
Sensory level
Motor level
NLI
Complete vs incomplete
Sacral sparing
Zone of partial preservation
What element of the ASIA exam is only performed for complete SCIs
Zone of partial preservation
How many key dermatomes are there
28
What sensations are tested on the ASIA exam
Light touch and pinprick
What area of the body is used as the control for testing sensation
The face behind the ear
What is the scale used for sensory testing on the ASIA exam
0 = absent
1 = impaired
2 = normal
NT = not tested
When would sensation be documented as not tested
Usually done when wearing a wand or have a brace that cannot be removed
Light touch sensory scoring procedure
Use a cotton tip applicator
Stroke across skin moving over a distance that is not > 1 cm
For light touch sensory testing of C6-8, what are of the body should be used
Dorsum of the proximal phalanx
Chest and abdomen points for light touch should be test in the _____________ line
Midclavicular line
Pinprick sensory scoring procedure
-Clean safety pin
-Use consistent pressure in each dermatome
-Poke one time only
If a patient can feel the sensation but cannot differentiate between light touch and pinprick, what sensory score are they given for the pinprick section
Absent
What dermatome represents the most caudal aspect of the spinal cord
S4/5
Deep anal pressure
On digital rectal exam patient is asked to report sensory awareness
Recorded as "present" or "absent"
Sensory level
The level where sensory function is normal on both sides of the body
(Most caudal section were they score 2s on both sides and above)
How many key muscle groups are tested on the ASIA exam
10
Procedure for motor exam on ASIA
Examine rostral to caudal
Tested in supine
0-5 scale
ASIA motor exam: 1
Muscle twitch/partial ROM in gravity eliminated
ASIA motor exam: 2
Full active ROM in gravity eliminated position
ASIA motor exam: 3
Full active ROM against gravity
ASIA motor exam: 4
Able to generate some resistance
ASIA motor exam: 5
Normal strength
ASIA motor exam UE myotomes
C5: Elbow flexors
C6: Wrist extensors
C7: Elbow extensors
C8: Finger flexors
T1: Finger abductors
ASIA motor exam LE myotomes
L2: Hip flexors
L3: Knee extensors
L4: Ankle dorsiflexors
L5: Great toe extensor
S1: Ankle plantarflexors
Voluntary anal contraction
Contraction of EAS around examiners finger
Graded as absent/present
If you can't test a muscle, what do you document
Empty or not tested
If muscles have only the rostral root intact they will likely have a ___/5 strength
If both roots are intact, they will likely have ___/5 strength
3/5; 5/5
Motor score on ASIA exam
Level at which strength is at least a 3/5 with all level above being a 5/5
Scored for each side, overall score is last normal for both
For the thoracic spine, what grade is given for motor when you only have sensory information
if sensation is a 2 for that dermatome, you assume that they have 5/5 strength
Neurological level of injury
The most caudal level at which both motor and sensory are intact on both sides of the body
-Motor at least 3/5 with all level above being 5/5
-Sensory intact (B) for LT and PP with all sensation above intact
If there is no key muscle for a segment that has sensory intact, the _______ level defines the ______ level and the NLI
Sensory; motor