1/13
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Budget Set
Given prices (P1, P2) and m, the budget set is the set of all affordable bundles. That is all (x1, x2) such that ((P1)(X1))+ ((P2)(X2)) is less than or equal to m.
Budget line
The set of bundles that cost exactly m.
Completeness
Any 2 bundles can be compared. Given any bundles (x1, x2) and (y1,y2), we assume that (x1, x2) ≿ (y1,y2) or (y1,y2) ≿ (x1, x2) or both. In which case the consumer is indifferent between them.
Reflexive
Any bundle is at least as good as itself: (x1, x2) ≿ (x1, x2), or (x1, x2) ~ (x1, x2).
Transitive
If (x1, x2) ≿ (y1,y2) and (y1,y2) ≿ (z1,z2) then (x1x2) ≿ (z1,z2).
Along with the previous assumptions, transitivity implies that when a consumer faces a list of bundles, they can rank-order the bundles. (XYZ)
Monotonicity
More is better —> If y1 ≿ x1, and y2 ≿ x2, and at least one of these inequalities is strict (≻), then it must be that (y1, y2) ≻ (x1, x2) → Indifference curves have a negative slope
Convexity
Given t between 0 and 1, if (x1, x2) ~ (y1, y2), then (tx1+ (1-t)y1, tx2 + (1-t)y2) ≿ (x1,x2) —> balanced bundle is better than extremes
Marginal rate of substitution
rate at which consumer can substitute between two goods while remaining indifferent
For well-behaved preferences, MRS is:
negative — consumer is willing to give up some of good one to get more of the other
diminishing — the less consumer has of Good 1, the more consumer is willing to give up of Good 2 to getmore of Good 1
Utility is ordinal
the utility number assigned doesn’t matter, we just compare utilities between bundles to see which is preferred
Normal good
more income, higher demand
Inferior good
more income, lower demand
Ordinary good
own price goes down, demand goes up
Giffen good
own price goes down, demand goes down