Studied by 0 people
Outline 3 premises and 2 conclusions for Leibnz’’s argument for innate knowledge
P1. senses only give particular instances
P2. Collection of instances can never show necessity of a truth
P3. grasp and prove necessary truths such as maths
C1. necessary truth not derived by sense
C2. mind is source of necessary truths that are innate
d
d
dd
d
d
d
