1/33
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Reward-cost stage
grades 2-3
children expect friends to offer help, share common activities, provide stimulating ideas, be able to join in organized play, offer judgments, be physically nearby, and be demographically similar to them
Normative Stage
grades 4-5
children expect friends to accept and admire them, bring loyalty and commitment to the friendship, and express similar values and attitudes toward rules and sanctions
Empathic stage
grades 6-7
children begin to expect genuineness and the potential for intimacy in their friends they expect friends to understand them and be willing to engage in self-disclosure
They want friends to accept their help, share common interests, and hold similar attitudes and values across a range of topics (not just rules)
Peer group network
the cluster of peer acquaintances who are familiar with and interact with one another at different times for common play or task-oriented purposes
gang
a group of adolescents or adults who form an allegiance for a common purpose
crowd
a collection of people who others have stereotypes on the basis of their perceived shared attitudes or activities (ex: populars or nerds)
Collective efficacy
People's shared beliefs in their collective power to achieve a goal or produce a desired result
Pygmalion effect
a phenomenon in which teachers’ expectations that students will do well are realized
natural mentors
include extended family members, family friends, neighbors, teachers, coaches, after-school program staff, and religious group leaders
formal mentors
mentors associated with programs such as Big Brothers/Big Sisters
premoral stage
children show little concern or awareness for rules (under age 5)
Moral realism
when children are about 5 years old, they show great respect for rules, especially if they come from an authority figure, and apply them quite inflexibly (ex: it’s right because my dad said so)
Moral absolutism
rigid application of rules to all individuals regardless of culture or circumstance (ex: If asked whether kids in other countries could play marbles with different rules, children are sure they could not)
immanent justice
the notion that any deviation from rules will inevitably result in punishment or retribution
moral reciprocity
begins at 11 years old: children recognize that rules may be questioned and changed; in judging others’ behavior children consider the feelings and views of others, and believe in equal justice
Level 1 Preconventional Level
justification for behavior/moral judgment is based on the desire to avoid punishment and gain rewards
Stage 1 of Preconventional Level
avoid punishment
Stage 2 of Preconventional Level
seek rewards
Level 2 Conventional Level
moral judgment is based on the motive to conform, either to get approval from others or to follow society’s rules and conventions
Stage 3 Conventional Level
conform to get approval from others
Stage 4 Conventional Level
Conform with society’s rules, laws, and conventions such as duty to family, marriage vows, or the country
Level 3 Postconventional Level
moral judgments are controlled by an internalized ethical code that is relatively independent of approval of disapproval of others
Stage 5 of Postconventional level
morality is based on society’s consensus about human rights
Stage 6 Postconventional level
morality is based on abstract principles of justice and equality
Social Conventional Domain
An area of social judgment focused on social expectations, norms, and regularities that help facilitate smooth and efficient functioning in society
Psychological Domain
An area of social judgment focused on beliefs and knowledge of self and others
self-regulation
the ability to use strategies and plans to control one’s behavior in the absence of external surveillance including inhibiting inappropriate behavior and delaying gratification
Passive inhibition
resulting from fear and anxiety; unconscious
active inhibition
resulting from effortful control; conscious and deliberate
Level 1 Hedonistic
concerned with self-oriented consequences
decision to help or not help someone is based on consideration of direct gain to self, future reciprocity, and concern for people to whom the person is bound by affectional tied
Level 2 Needs-Oriented
Expresses concern for physical, material, and psychological needs of others even if they conflict with own needs
concern is expressed in the simplest terms without verbal expressions of sympathy, evidence of self-reflective role-taking, or guilt
Level 3 Approval Oriented
uses stereotypes images of good and bad persons and behaviors
consideration of others’ approval and acceptance in justifying prosocial or nonhelping behaviors
Level 4 Empathic
judgments include evidence of sympathetic responding, self-reflective role taking, concern with the other’s humanness, and guilt or positive affect related to the consequences of actions
Level 5 internalized
justifications for helping or not are based on internalized values, norms or responsibilities
the desire to maintain individual and societal contractual obligations, and the belief in dignity, rights, and equality of all individuals