Studied by 2 people
Kendler et al (2006) purpose
Investigated the genetic and environmental factors contributing to major depression, aiming to understand the relative influence of genetics and life events. The study used twin data to assess the interaction of these factors.
Kendler et al. (2006) research method
Kendler et al. (2006) examined 1,800 female twins from the Swedish Twin Registry to assess major depression. The study compared concordance rates of monozygotic (identical, sharing 100% genetic material) and dizygotic (fraternal, sharing 50%) twins to estimate genetic and environmental contributions to depression.
Kendler et al (2006) key findings
Kendler et al. (2006) found that genetic factors significantly influence the risk of major depression, with a heritability estimate of 38%. Genetic predisposition increases vulnerability to depression, especially after stressful life events, highlighting the interaction between genetics and environment in the onset of depression under the diathesis-stress model.
Kendler et al (2006) ethical considerations
Ethical issues in Kendler et al. (2006) include: Informed Consent - Participants were informed about the research and consented voluntarily; Confidentiality - Key to protect sensitive genetic and health data; Emotional Impact - Researchers ensured support for participants experiencing distress related to depression.
Kendler et al (2006) conclusion
Kendler et al. (2006) concluded that major depression results from a combination of genetic and environmental factors, highlighting that genetics significantly influence the risk of depression, while life stressors can trigger it in predisposed individuals. This study enhances understanding of the gene-environment interaction in depression and supports the biopsychosocial model of mental health, indicating that biological, psychological, and social factors contribute to mental disorders, leading to improved treatment approaches.
Maguire et al. (2000) purpose
Investigated how extensive experience with spatial navigation, particularly in London taxi drivers, affects brain structure, specifically the hippocampus, to determine if navigation experience leads to structural changes in areas involved in spatial memory.
Maguire et al (2000) research method
Maguire et al. (2000) used structural MRI to compare the hippocampal structures of 16 male London taxi drivers with a control group of 50 male non-taxi drivers. The taxi drivers were selected due to their extensive training in memorizing London’s complex street layout. MRI scans focused on the posterior hippocampus (related to spatial navigation) and the anterior hippocampus (related to general memory processes).
Maguire et al. (2000) key findings
London taxi drivers exhibited a larger posterior hippocampus associated with spatial memory and navigation, while their anterior hippocampus was smaller. The size of the posterior hippocampus increased with years of driving, indicating that extensive navigation experience may lead to structural changes, providing strong evidence for neuroplasticity.
Maguire et al (2000) ethical considerations
Participants gave informed consent and were made aware of study details and use of brain images. Confidentiality of MRI data and personal information was prioritized. Debriefing was conducted to ensure participants understood the study's purpose and findings.
Maguire et al (2000) conclusion
Maguire et al. (2000) provide evidence of neuroplasticity, showing that the posterior hippocampus in London taxi drivers is larger than in non-taxi drivers. This suggests that extensive spatial navigation experience leads to structural brain changes, emphasizing the hippocampus's role in memory and learning, with implications for therapeutic applications.
H.M overview
Henry Molaison, known as H.M., is a famous case study in psychology and neuroscience due to his significant memory changes following a 1953 surgery for epilepsy. His case revealed critical insights into the hippocampus's role in memory formation and the
H.M. Background
H.M. (born 1933) suffered from severe, medication-resistant epilepsy, leading to an experimental surgery at age 27 by Dr. William Scoville, which removed parts of his medial temporal lobes, including the hippocampus. The surgery successfully reduced seizures but resulted in severe memory impairment.
H.M. impact of surgery on memory
After surgery, H.M. suffered from anterograde amnesia, preventing him from forming new long-term memories, while his short-term memory and ability to perform basic tasks remained intact. He could recall new information only for a few minutes and did not recognize his reflection. Additionally, H.M. experienced retrograde amnesia, losing memories from shortly before the surgery but retaining earlier childhood memories. His procedural memory was functional, as he could improve in motor tasks despite not recalling the practice.
H.M. research on memory
H.M. was extensively studied by Brenda Milner to understand his memory deficits. Key findings include that his short-term memory remained intact, as shown by the Digit Span Task, while he demonstrated improvement in procedural memory through the Mirror Drawing Task, despite not recalling the task. H.M.'s case highlighted the hippocampus's essential role in consolidating new long-term memories and suggested that other brain regions, like the cortex, are involved in storing these memories.
H.M. ethical considerations
Ethical issues in H.M.'s case include: 1) Informed Consent: H.M. consented to surgery, but it is unclear if he fully understood its consequences; post-surgery, he couldn't consent to studies due to memory loss. 2) Confidentiality: His identity was protected using the pseudonym 'H.M.' ensuring privacy during research. 3) Long-term Impact: The surgery's significant effects on H.M.'s life raise ethical concerns about the justification of experimental medical procedures vs. their risks.
H.M. conclusion
H.M.'s case is pivotal in psychology and neuroscience, demonstrating the hippocampus's role in memory consolidation. It highlighted the differences between declarative memory (facts/events) and procedural memory (skills/actions). His impairment underscored neuroplasticity, showing the brain's capacity to adapt, as he could still learn new skills despite memory issues, fostering further research into memory mechanisms and the brain-behavior relationship
Savic et al 2001 purpose
Savic et al. (2001) conducted a pioneering study to explore the role of pheromones in human sexual behavior, specifically investigating whether androstadienone, a steroid present in human sweat, acts as a pheromone. The research aimed to examine how androstadienone influences brain activity related to sexual attraction and behavior, providing insights into the neurobiological mechanisms behind human sexual attraction.
Savic et al 2001 research method
Savic and colleagues used positron emission tomography (PET) to measure brain activity in response to androstadienone and control substances. The study involved 24 heterosexual participants (12 males and 12 females), with a focus on how the brain responds to androstadienone, a potential human sexual pheromone linked to male body odor. Participants were exposed to androstadienone and control odors (like lavender) during the PET scan to compare the brain's responses to sexual and non-sexual stimuli.
Savic et al 2001 key findings
The PET scans showed that exposure to androstadienone increased brain activity in regions linked to sexual attraction and arousal, including the preoptic area and anterior hypothalamus. These areas are known to play a role in sexual behavior, suggesting that androstadienone may influence sexual attraction. The anterior hypothalamus' activation further supports the idea that pheromones affect sexual attraction.
The study also found gender differences, with women showing a significantly stronger brain response to androstadienone compared to men. This suggests that pheromones may influence sexual attraction differently in males and females, with a more significant role in women's sexual behavior.
Overall, the findings indicate that androstadienone might function as a sexual and social pheromone, influencing attraction and behavior unconsciously. The study supports the idea that pheromones can affect human sexual behavior and mating.
Savic et al 2001 ethical considerations
Informed Consent:
As in most psychological research, the participants provided informed consent before participating in the study. They were made aware of the nature of the study, including the use of PET scans to observe brain activity and the exposure to chemical stimuli (pheromones).
Confidentiality:
Since PET scans involve imaging participants' brain activity, confidentiality was paramount. The data collected, including individual brain scans and responses, were kept anonymous and protected from public disclosure.
Debriefing:
After the study, participants would have been debriefed to ensure they understood the goals of the research and the findings. Ethical guidelines require that participants are provided with full information about the research and any potential impacts it may have had on them.
Psychological Harm:
The study exposed participants to specific scents, but there were no known risks of psychological harm associated with this. However, the researchers ensured that participants were comfortable and did not have any adverse reactions to the pheromones.
Savic et al 2001 conclusion
The study by Savic et al. (2001) provides strong evidence that androstadienone, a chemical found in human sweat, can act as a pheromone that influences brain activity associated with sexual attraction. The results show that exposure to androstadienone led to activation in brain areas linked to sexual arousal, supporting the idea that pheromones may play a role in human sexual behavior. This research contributes to our understanding of how chemical signals may influence attraction, suggesting that pheromones are an important yet often unconscious factor in sexual and social interactions.
The study also opens up new areas of research into human pheromones, especially in understanding their potential influence on attraction and behavior between the sexes. It highlights the complexity of human attraction, demonstrating that unconscious chemical signals may affect our behavior and responses in significant ways.
Explain ethical considerations when studying genetics and behavior with reference to kendler et al (2006)
When studying the relationship between genetics and behavior, ethical considerations are crucial to ensure that research is conducted in a responsible and respectful manner. One key study that illustrates these concerns is Kendler et al. (2006), which examined the genetic and environmental influences on the risk of major depression.
Ethical Issues in Kendler et al. (2006):
Informed Consent:
In studies involving genetics, informed consent is essential, especially when participants are asked to provide genetic data. In the Kendler et al. study, participants were informed about the study’s aims, which involved gathering information about both genetic predispositions and life events. They had to give consent for both psychological interviews and genetic testing.
There is an ethical duty to ensure that participants fully understand the potential implications of their involvement, including the potential discovery of genetic predispositions to mental illnesses like depression.
Privacy and Confidentiality:
Genetic data is highly sensitive, and there is a risk that personal or family genetic information could be misused. In the Kendler et al. study, maintaining confidentiality was crucial, as genetic data could reveal predispositions to mental health disorders, which could affect participants' privacy or social status.
Ethical research protocols need to include safeguards to protect this data from being used inappropriately, such as for insurance or employment discrimination.
Genetic Determinism:
A concern when studying the genetics of behavior is the potential for genetic determinism — the idea that genetic factors alone determine behavior. This can be problematic because it may lead to the reduction of complex behaviors, such as depression, to merely genetic factors, ignoring environmental and social influences.
Kendler et al. (2006) carefully considered the interaction between genetic predisposition and life events, highlighting the importance of environmental factors. By focusing on how genes interact with life experiences, the study avoided the trap of genetic determinism, though such studies can still risk misinterpretation.
Impact on Participants:
Discovering genetic risks for behaviors like mental illness can have emotional or psychological consequences for participants. Researchers must ensure that individuals are supported and counseled, especially if results suggest they are at a higher risk of developing depression or other conditions.
The ethical issue of whether participants should be informed of their genetic risks (such as predisposition to mental health disorders) is also significant, as this information could impact their psychological well-being and life decisions.
Conclusion:
The Kendler et al. (2006) study is a good example of how ethical considerations must be integrated into research that examines the interplay between genetics and behavior. Key ethical concerns include obtaining informed consent, maintaining privacy and confidentiality, avoiding genetic determinism, and addressing the potential emotional impact of revealing genetic predispositions to behavioral disorders. Ethical research practices ensure that the findings of such studies are used responsibly and with respect for participants' well-being.
Explain genetic similarities with reference kendler et al
Kendler et al. (2006) conducted a study that explored the genetic and environmental influences on the development of major depression, and it provides valuable insights into genetic similarities between individuals.
Study Overview:
In this study, Kendler et al. used a sample of twins (both identical and fraternal) to investigate how genetic and environmental factors contributed to the risk of major depression. They focused on understanding whether depression had a genetic basis, how much of it could be attributed to shared environmental factors, and how individual genetic predispositions interacted with life stressors.
Key Findings on Genetic Similarities:
Higher Concordance Rates in Identical Twins:
Kendler et al. found that identical twins (monozygotic twins) had higher concordance rates for major depression than fraternal twins (dizygotic twins). This indicates that genetic similarities play a significant role in the development of depression. Identical twins share 100% of their genes, while fraternal twins share only 50%.
The higher concordance rates for depression in identical twins suggest that genetic factors contribute to the likelihood of developing the disorder, as their greater genetic similarity increases the chance that both twins would experience the same condition.
Genetic Contribution to Depression:
The study also showed that genetic factors accounted for a significant proportion of the risk for major depression, with the estimated heritability of depression being around 38%. This means that about 38% of the variance in the likelihood of experiencing depression can be attributed to genetic factors, while the remaining variance is due to environmental factors.
The comparison of concordance rates between identical and fraternal twins illustrates the importance of genetic similarities in the risk of depression. Identical twins, who share more genetic material, are more likely to both experience depression compared to fraternal twins, supporting the idea that genetics plays a substantial role in this mental health condition.
Gene-Environment Interaction:
Kendler et al. also emphasized the interaction between genetic predispositions and life stressors in the development of depression. While genetic similarities are important, the study highlighted that environmental factors, such as stressful life events, can also trigger depression in individuals, especially those with a genetic predisposition. This suggests that while genetic similarities can increase the risk of depression, the interaction with life experiences is also critical.
Conclusion:
The findings from Kendler et al. (2006) highlight the role of genetic similarities in the development of major depression. The higher concordance rates of depression in identical twins, compared to fraternal twins, provide strong evidence for the genetic contribution to the disorder. However, the study also underscores the importance of the interaction between genetics and environmental factors, suggesting that genetic predispositions interact with life events to influence the likelihood of developing depression.
Explain how a research method was used, why and if it was the best method, to study the brain and behavior (experiments/ lab studies) with reference to maguire et al (2000)
Research Method Used to Study the Brain and Behavior in Maguire et al. (2000)
Maguire et al. (2000) conducted a study on the hippocampus in London taxi drivers, which is a classic example of how neuroimaging techniques can be used to study the brain and behavior. The study focused on how the brain's structure may change in response to experience and behavior, specifically the effects of navigating complex city streets on the hippocampus.
Research Method: Structural MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging)
Method Explanation:
Maguire et al. (2000) used structural MRI scans to compare the brain structures of London taxi drivers with those of a control group of non-taxi drivers. This technique allows for detailed, high-resolution images of the brain's anatomy.
The study aimed to investigate whether the hippocampus, which is associated with spatial memory and navigation, was larger in taxi drivers, who undergo extensive spatial navigation training, compared to non-taxi drivers.
Why This Method Was Used:
The structural MRI method was chosen because it provides a non-invasive and highly detailed way to observe brain anatomy without requiring surgical procedures or post-mortem analysis.
The hippocampus was of particular interest because it is believed to play a key role in spatial memory and navigation. Given that taxi drivers in London undergo years of training to memorize city layouts, Maguire hypothesized that their hippocampi might show structural changes as a result of their extensive navigation experience.
Is It the Best Method?:
Strengths:
Non-invasive: MRI allows researchers to examine brain structure in vivo (while the person is alive), without the need for surgery or injections, making it an ethical and safe approach.
High spatial resolution: MRI provides very clear, detailed images of the brain, which allows researchers to identify specific areas, such as the hippocampus, and measure their size with great precision.
Direct link between brain structure and behavior: The study allowed for a direct comparison between brain anatomy (hippocampus size) and behavior (navigation ability), linking structural changes in the brain to real-world behavior.
Limitations:
Causality: While the study found differences in the hippocampus size between taxi drivers and non-taxi drivers, MRI cannot establish causality. It shows that there is an association between brain structure and experience, but it does not prove that the brain changes were caused by navigation experience alone.
Cross-sectional nature: The study compared taxi drivers with control participants, but it did not track changes over time, so it’s unclear whether the hippocampus enlargement occurred due to the experience of being a taxi driver or whether taxi drivers had a naturally larger hippocampus to begin with.
Generalizability: The study focused specifically on London taxi drivers, so it may not apply to other populations or to people with different types of spatial navigation demands.
Conclusion:
The use of structural MRI in Maguire et al. (2000) was an appropriate and effective method for studying how behavior (navigational experience) can affect brain structure. The method's high spatial resolution allowed for a detailed analysis of the hippocampus, and the non-invasive nature of MRI made it a practical and ethical choice for studying live participants.
Although it provided compelling evidence of a relationship between spatial navigation experience and hippocampal volume, the method does not address causality or the potential influence of other variables. Despite these limitations, MRI remains one of the best tools for investigating brain structure in living humans, especially in studies like this one that seek to link brain changes to specific behaviors.
Explain how a research method was used, why and if it was the best method, to study the brain and behavior (psychological studies) with reference to H.M
Research Method Used to Study the Brain and Behavior in H.M. (Henry Molaison)
The case of H.M. (Henry Molaison) is one of the most famous in the history of neuroscience, providing profound insights into the relationship between brain structure and memory. H.M. had his hippocampus removed in an experimental surgery to treat severe epilepsy, and as a result, his memory and behavior were drastically altered. Researchers used a combination of neuropsychological testing, case study analysis, and brain imaging to investigate the effects of the surgery on his memory and behavior.
Research Method: Neuropsychological Testing and Case Study Approach
Method Explanation:
Neuropsychological testing was the primary research method used to study H.M.'s brain and behavior. This involved conducting a variety of cognitive and memory tests to understand the extent of his memory deficits, particularly his short-term memory and long-term memory abilities. Researchers also compared his performance on these tests before and after his surgery.
The case study approach provided a deep, detailed examination of H.M.'s unique neurological condition over an extended period. Researchers were able to observe how the removal of his hippocampus impacted his memory and other cognitive functions, such as language, intelligence, and perception.
Why This Method Was Used:
The neuropsychological testing method was essential because H.M.’s memory deficits were profound, yet he was still able to engage in conversation and perform other cognitive tasks normally. Researchers wanted to isolate his memory problems and determine whether his ability to form new long-term memories was specifically related to damage in the hippocampus.
The case study approach was particularly suitable for H.M.'s situation because he was a rare case. Only a small number of individuals undergo such specific brain surgery, and H.M.’s ongoing participation in research for over 50 years provided unique opportunities to understand the long-term effects of his brain injury. Detailed, longitudinal observation allowed researchers to gain insights that would have been impossible through a typical experimental design.
Is It the Best Method?:
Strengths:
Rich, detailed data: The case study of H.M. allowed for an in-depth analysis of his memory deficits. Researchers were able to observe the effects of brain damage on behavior in a way that would not have been possible in a controlled experimental setting.
Longitudinal perspective: The extended duration of the case study allowed researchers to track H.M.’s behavior and memory over time. This long-term observation led to groundbreaking insights into the nature of memory.
Insight into the role of the hippocampus: By studying H.M., researchers could isolate the role of the hippocampus in memory formation. H.M.’s inability to form new long-term memories suggested that the hippocampus plays a crucial role in memory consolidation, particularly in moving memories from short-term to long-term storage.
Limitations:
Lack of control: The case study method lacks the control of experimental research. It is difficult to isolate variables in a case study since the subject is one individual, and the results may not be generalizable to other people.
Ethical concerns: H.M.’s involvement in the study raises some ethical questions. He had undergone the surgery at a young age to treat his epilepsy, and it is unclear whether he fully understood the long-term impact of the surgery. However, H.M. did give consent to participate in the research, and it is important to note that the case study provided valuable insights into memory processes.
Individual differences: The results from studying one individual cannot be easily generalized to a broader population, especially since H.M.’s case was highly unique. This means that while the findings were groundbreaking, they must be interpreted with caution.
Conclusion:
The neuropsychological testing and case study approach used in H.M.'s research was the best method for studying the effects of brain damage on memory. Given that H.M. was a unique case, these methods allowed researchers to obtain a deep understanding of how specific brain regions, such as the hippocampus, are involved in memory processes.
While the case study method has limitations, such as a lack of generalizability and potential ethical concerns, it provided profound insights into the relationship between brain structures and behavior. H.M.'s case was instrumental in shaping modern theories of memory, especially regarding the distinction between short-term and long-term memory, and the role of the hippocampus in memory consolidation.
Identify and explain one pheromone with reference to savic
heromones are chemicals released by an individual that influence the behavior or physiological state of another individual of the same species. One well-known example of a pheromone that has been studied in humans is androstadienone, a compound believed to act as a human pheromone.
Study: Savic et al. (2001)
In their study, Savic et al. (2001) explored the role of androstadienone as a pheromone in human sexual behavior. The researchers aimed to investigate how this chemical compound, which is found in both men and women (but more concentrated in men), affects brain activity related to sexual attraction and arousal.
Method and Findings:
Savic et al. (2001) used positron emission tomography (PET) scans to measure brain activity in participants who were exposed to androstadienone and other control substances.
The study found that exposure to androstadienone led to specific changes in brain activity, particularly in areas of the brain linked to sexual attraction, such as the preoptic area and the anterior hypothalamus. These areas are known to be involved in sexual behavior and attraction, suggesting that androstadienone may influence human sexual attraction on a physiological level.
Explanation of Pheromone: Androstadienone
Androstadienone is a steroid compound that is often associated with male body odor, and it has been suggested to act as a social and sexual pheromone. In various animal species, pheromones play a key role in mating behavior, and studies like Savic et al. (2001) suggest that androstadienone may similarly influence sexual attraction in humans.
This chemical is present in human sweat and is often perceived unconsciously. It is thought to influence sexual attraction by altering brain responses to social or sexual cues, potentially affecting mood, behavior, and attraction without the individual being consciously aware of it.
Conclusion:
The study by Savic et al. (2001) provided strong evidence that androstadienone acts as a pheromone that can influence brain activity associated with sexual attraction. This study highlighted the potential role of pheromones in human behavior, showing that certain chemical compounds can have a physiological impact on how individuals perceive and respond to one another, particularly in sexual contexts.
Explain neuroplasticity with reference to maguire
Neuroplasticity refers to the brain's ability to reorganize itself by forming new neural connections in response to experience, learning, or environmental changes. This concept suggests that the brain is not a static structure but one that can adapt and change throughout life.
Study: Maguire et al. (2000) – London Taxi Drivers and the Hippocampus
Maguire et al. (2000) studied neuroplasticity by investigating the brains of London taxi drivers and their hippocampal structure. The study aimed to understand how extensive spatial navigation experience might lead to structural changes in the brain, specifically in the hippocampus, which is known to be involved in spatial memory and navigation.
Method and Findings:
Maguire et al. used structural MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) to compare the brain structures of London taxi drivers with a control group of non-taxi drivers. The study focused on the size and structure of the hippocampus, a region of the brain critical for navigation and memory.
The results revealed that the posterior hippocampus (the part of the hippocampus related to spatial memory and navigation) was significantly larger in the taxi drivers than in the control group. This suggested that the extensive spatial navigation required by taxi drivers in London, where they memorize complex street layouts, led to changes in the brain.
Interestingly, the study also found that the anterior hippocampus (which is involved in general memory processes) was smaller in taxi drivers, which indicates that the changes in hippocampal structure were likely related to the specific demands of their profession.
Neuroplasticity Explained:
The findings from Maguire et al. (2000) provide strong evidence for neuroplasticity because they demonstrate that the brain's structure can change in response to an individual’s environment and behavior. In this case, the repeated and prolonged experience of navigating the streets of London resulted in changes to the hippocampus, a brain region crucial for spatial navigation.
These structural changes are a direct result of the taxi drivers' learning experiences, supporting the idea that the brain is not fixed but can reorganize and adapt as we engage with the world around us.
Conclusion:
The study by Maguire et al. (2000) provides clear evidence of neuroplasticity by showing that the hippocampus can physically change in response to experience. The larger posterior hippocampus observed in London taxi drivers illustrates how the brain can adapt to the demands of a person's environment and tasks. This study underscores the brain's remarkable ability to reorganize its structure and function as a result of learning and experience, a hallmark of neuroplasticity.
Note 
Flashcard (111)