Analysis of Questionnaires

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/295

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

296 Terms

1
New cards

Questionnaire

a set of printed or written questions with a choice of answers, devised for the purpose of a survey or statistical study, main data collection tools in social sciences

2
New cards

item

statement or question and the response alternatives

3
New cards

aim of items

to give an incomplete description of reality

often consist of different scales (coherent, often fixed set of items)

measure not-directly observable items (IQ)

4
New cards

Validity

indicates whether a study’s findings are trustworthy

5
New cards

Reliability

is about precision and repeatability of measurement

6
New cards

Content of questionnaires

Behaviour

Beliefs

Opinions/values/attitudes

Demographics

7
New cards

Features of Questionnaires

  1. mode of administration

  2. question type

8
New cards

mode of administration

Interactional; with interviewer of self-administered technological; telephone, paper-and-penicil or mixed!

9
New cards

question type

open-ended

close-ended

10
New cards
construct L2
Abstract summary of related characteristics, behaviors, and attitudes (latent).
11
New cards
heuristic approach L2
Moves from nominal definition to dimensions, then to operational definition based on empirical measures.
12
New cards
construct method L2
Deductive method based on theory and nomological network to derive items.
13
New cards
construct method step 1 L2
Start with a conceptual/theoretical framework.
14
New cards
construct method step 2 L2
Develop a nomological network (link construct to related variables).
15
New cards
construct method step 3 L2
Define variables operationally (what to measure, how).
16
New cards
construct method step 4 L2
Test for construct validity: convergent and divergent (via MTMM, CFA, etc).
17
New cards
construct method step 5 L2
Final goal: homogeneous item set covering all construct aspects.
18
New cards
nomological network L2
Theoretical map showing how a construct relates to other constructs and variables.
19
New cards
facet design method L2
Deductive method using mapping sentence and facet classification to ensure content validity.
20
New cards
facet design step 1 L2
Identify essential behavioral features or processes.
21
New cards
facet design step 2 L2
Define facets (e.g., situational, behavioral, answer-type).
22
New cards
facet design step 3 L2
Define elements for each facet (called structs).
23
New cards
facet design step 4 L2
Cross-classify all facets; each unique combo = structuple.
24
New cards
facet L2
A relevant dimension of the construct, like situation or behavior.
25
New cards
struct L2
A specific element within a facet.
26
New cards
structuple L2
A unique combination of struct elements, used to generate scale items.
27
New cards
content validity L2
Extent to which an instrument covers all relevant parts of a construct.
28
New cards
rational method L2
Intuitive method relying on expert or respondent judgment without formal theory.
29
New cards
rational method key feature L2
Relies heavily on face validity (does it "look" like it measures the construct?).
30
New cards
face validity L2
How much an item appears to measure what it claims to measure on the surface.
31
New cards
prototypical method L2
Uses act nomination to identify typical behaviors of a construct (act frequency approach).
32
New cards
prototypical method step 1 L2
Ask a sample to nominate typical behaviors (acts).
33
New cards
prototypical method step 2 L2
Large sample rates how typical each behavior is.
34
New cards
prototypical method step 3 L2
Select most typical behaviors as items for your construct.
35
New cards
prototypical method key goal L2
Represent the most prototypical expressions of a construct in measurement.
36
New cards
process validity L2
Whether behaviors used in measurement reflect real-world processes.
37
New cards
internal method L2
Data-driven method using empirical item relations (e.g., factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha).
38
New cards
internal method step 1 L2
Select large number of items from item banks or existing questionnaires.
39
New cards
internal method step 2 L2
Compute correlations between items.
40
New cards
internal method step 3 L2
Use factor analysis to identify homogeneous item clusters.
41
New cards
internal method step 4 L2
Assess internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha, item-rest correlations.
42
New cards
factor analytic method L2
Technique to derive latent dimensions based on inter-item correlations (EFA, PCA).
43
New cards
external method L2
Items are selected based on their relationship with an external criterion (e.g., job performance).
44
New cards
external method step 1 L2
Define relevant external criterion (must be practical or theoretically grounded).
45
New cards
external method step 2 L2
Collect a heterogeneous set of items related to that criterion.
46
New cards
external method step 3 L2
Select items that correlate highly with criterion, but low with each other.
47
New cards
criterion validity L2
Association between scale scores and an external criterion variable.
48
New cards
concurrent validity L2
Correlation with a criterion measured at the same time.
49
New cards
predictive validity L2
Correlation with a criterion measured in the future.
50
New cards
formulating questions L3
Principle of writing items clearly, precisely, and without bias or complexity.
51
New cards
no interpretation questions L3
Avoid items that require reading or interpretative skills above age 12.
52
New cards
short and simple wording L3
Use short sentences and easy words, like contingency items.
53
New cards
double-barreled questions L3
Avoid asking about two things in one question.
54
New cards
leading questions L3
Avoid questions that suggest a particular answer.
55
New cards
loaded questions L3
Avoid items that assume something untrue or controversial.
56
New cards
double negatives L3
Avoid confusing negations like "not unhappy".
57
New cards
indicative vs contra-indicative L3
Use a balance of positively and negatively phrased items.
58
New cards
same meaning for all L3
Ensure words mean the same thing to every respondent.
59
New cards
conditional first L3
Start questions with the conditional phrase (if necessary).
60
New cards
conformity bias L3
Tendency to answer in socially desirable ways.
61
New cards
non-response bias L3
Failure to respond to certain items or entire survey.
62
New cards
acquiescence L3
Tendency to agree (or disagree) regardless of item content.
63
New cards
nay-saying L3
Tendency to answer all items negatively regardless of meaning.
64
New cards
mutually exclusive L3
Answer options should not conceptually overlap.
65
New cards
collectively exhaustive L3
Answer options must cover all possible categories.
66
New cards
logical order L3
Place alternatives in a meaningful sequence (e.g. − to +).
67
New cards
same response options L3
Use consistent response formats across items.
68
New cards
avoid open-ended L3
Prefer closed-ended questions for clarity and analysis.
69
New cards
avoid multiple answers L3
Prefer single-option responses to avoid ambiguity.
70
New cards
bipolar answers L3
Measures intensity in both directions (e.g., strongly disagree ↔ strongly agree).
71
New cards
unipolar answers L3
Measures intensity in one direction from zero to maximum.
72
New cards
symmetry L3
Equal positive and negative answer options around a neutral midpoint.
73
New cards
balance L3
Equal intervals between answer options to allow meaningful averaging.
74
New cards
introductory part L3
Introduces the questionnaire, explains purpose, time, and confidentiality.
75
New cards
instructions section L3
Explains how to fill in sections or respond to specific types of items.
76
New cards
order of questions L3
Organize by topic and avoid fatigue or response bias.
77
New cards
layout L3
Design should be clean, readable, and use helpful formatting cues.
78
New cards
concluding part L3
Thanks participants and ends the questionnaire appropriately.
79
New cards
80
New cards
likert scale L3.5
A group of Likert items forming one continuous scale.
81
New cards
likert item L3.5
A statement the respondent evaluates using fixed response options.
82
New cards
covariance L3.5
Measures linear relationship strength between two quantitative variables; unstandardized.
83
New cards
covariance formula L3.5
cov(X,Y) = Σ(xi - x̄)(yi - ȳ) / (n - 1)
84
New cards
standardization L3.5
Needed because covariance depends on unit of measurement.
85
New cards
pearsons r L3.5
Standardized index of linear association between two continuous or dichotomous variables.
86
New cards
r range L3.5
Pearson’s r ranges from −1 to +1.
87
New cards
low correlation meaning L3.5
Low r values indicate high scatter around the regression line.
88
New cards
ecological fallacy L3.5
Mistakenly drawing conclusions about individuals based on group-level data.
89
New cards
linear combination L4
Sum of variables each multiplied by a constant (e.g., ax + by + cz).
90
New cards
univariate outlier L4
Extreme value on one variable (X or Y).
91
New cards
bivariate outlier L4
Unusual X-Y combination (e.g., rich + unhappy = Bill Gates).
92
New cards
restriction of range L4
Narrow value range for X or Y; lowers r.
93
New cards
sample selection bias L4
Biased sample causes restricted range.
94
New cards
group-specific correlation L4
Correlation differs within groups vs. total sample.
95
New cards
pearson r formula L4
r = cov(X,Y) / (sx * sy).
96
New cards
linear relation only L4
Pearson’s r only detects linear, not curved trends.
97
New cards
measurement error L4
Random error reduces reliability, thus lowers r.
98
New cards
low reliability L4
Leads to low observed correlation (attenuation).
99
New cards
dimensionality reduction L4
Reduces number of variables while preserving info.
100
New cards
factor analysis L4

Method to find latent structures; superordinate term.

help in minimizing information loss and dimensionality reduction and are used to examine the internal structur