informed consent

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/10

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

lectures 1-5

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

11 Terms

1
New cards

what 2 types of claims are there for informed consent with supporting cases?

  1. trespass - battery → intentional and direct physical contact with P without consent (Collins v Wilcock [1984])

  2. negligent failure to warn → failure to warn P about risks that could materialise or alternative treatments (Chatterton v Gerson [1981])

2
New cards

what is the standard of proof?

on the balance of probabilities

3
New cards

what remedies could be available to the P?

  • compensation/damages for the harm suffered

4
New cards

what are the 3 aspects of consent for the acceptance and rejection of treatments?

  1. mental capacity → P must be able to make decision and can be impaired by e.g. psychiatric conditions

  2. informed → information given to P by D must reach standard

  3. voluntary → must be no external force, e.g. coercion, acting on P

5
New cards

what case looks at informed consent in relation to (1) mental capacity?

Kings College Hospital NHS Trust [2015]

  • capacitous adult has sovereignty over own body and mind including right to refuse treatment

6
New cards

what case looks at the (2) informed element of consent in relation to the test of real consent?

Chatterton v Gerson [1981]

  • once P is broadly informed of nature of procedure and consents, consent is real

7
New cards

what case looks at the (3) voluntary element of consent in relation to self-determination?

Secretary of State for Home Department v Robb [1995]Fam 127

  • principle of self-determination requires respect to be given to P’s wishes

8
New cards

what case looks at the extent of liability of D in relation to battery?

Wilson v Pringle [1987]

  • D is liable for all direct consequences even if unforeseeable and D intended to touch but not injure as D voluntarily made contact

9
New cards

what is a defence to battery and what case supports this?

St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust v S [1999]

  • valid consent to medical treatment is defence to battery

10
New cards

what case looks at mistaken belief that P consents in relation to battery?

Schweizer v Central Hospital (1974)

  • D is liable if consent for procedure is based on wrong information and D carried out procedure

11
New cards