1/24
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
what is a drug? (plants, herbs, supplaments, medicine)
is addiction a “Brain Disease”? A habit? Self-medication?
should we consider existence of “behavioral” addiction? (e.g., gambling, internet gaming, sex addiction)
should governments care/have a say in what substances their citizens use?
does culture matter? (e.g., religious practices)
should all (or some?) currently illegal drugs be legalized? decriminaled? medical? recreational? harm reduction or prohibition?
drug regulation: some history
Pure Food & Drug Act (1906) → required “patent” medicines to have labels, w/ contents
created the Food & Drug Administration (FDA)
Harrison Narcotic Tax Act (1914) → regulated & taxed cocaine & opiates - (fun fact → in 1921, cigarettes were illegal in 14 states)
Prohibition (1920-1933) → 18th Amendment to US constitution, prohibited production sale, & transport of “intoxicating liquors”
DID lower US drinking rate
repealed by 21st Amendment
Marijuana Tax Act (1937): outlawed non-medical (untaxed) possession of opium, morphine, heroin & marijuana
Controlled Subtance Act (C.S.A., 1970):
established D.E.A. (Drug Enforcement Administration), 5 drug “schedules”, based on medical use, abuse potential, risk of dependency
President Nixon declares the “War on Drugs”
Federal Analogue Act (1986): due to appearance of “designer drugs” altered molecules would be technically legal
this act closed the loophole; any chemical “substantially similar” to a Schedule I or II drug intended for human consumption would be treated as Schedule I
CSA & DEA Substances
Schedule I: Substances in this schedule have →
no currently accepted medical use in the US
a lack of accepted safety for use under medical supervision &
a potential for abuse
Schedule II: substances have a high potential for abuse, which may lead to severe psychological or physical dependence
Schedule III: Substances have less potential for abuse than substances in Schedules I or II & may lead to moderate or low physical dependence or high psychological dependence
Schedule IV: substances have a low potential for abuse relative to substances in Schedule III
Schedule V: substances have a low potential for abuse relative to substances listed in Schedule IV & consist primarily of preparations containing limited quantities of certain opiates
DEA Schedules: Shifting legality of “Kratom”
supposed to help w/ opiate addiction
what drugs are the most “dangerous”?
AD/LD vs. Dependence Potential
highest = heroin
lowest = LSD
Drugs harms beyond addiction - UK Drug Harms Study (2010)
high score = most harmful
ex: highest score → alcohol
HHS, SAMHSA, & the NSDUH
US Govt. Dept. of Health & Human Services (HHS)
has a division called Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)
& they produce the National Survey on Drug Use & Health (NSDUH)
“Downward Spiral” of Addiction Processes:
Preoccupation/Anticipation
Binge/Intoxication
Withdrawal
taken in large amounts than intended
preoccupation w/ obtaining
persistant physical or psychological problem
persistant desire
tolerance/withdrawal
social, occupational, or recreational activities compromised
spiraling distress
→ addiction
DSM-5: Substance USe Disorder
11 criteria → 2-3 = mild, 4-5 = moderate, 6+ = severe
taking the substance in larger amounts or for longer than meant to
wanting to cut down or stop using the substance but not managing to do so
spending a lot of time getting, using, or recovering from use of substance
cravings & urges to use the substance
^^ impaired control
not managing to do what you should do at work, home, or school, because of substance use
continuing to use, even when it causes problems in relationships
giving up important social, occupational, or recreational activities bc of substance use
^^ social impairment
using substances again & again, even when it puts you in danger
continuing to use, even when you know you have a physical or psychological problem that could have been caused or made worse by the substance
^^ risky use
needing more of the substance to get the effect you want (tolerance)
development of withdrawal symptoms, which can be relieved by taking more of the substance
^^ pharm dependence
Nucleus Accumbens (NAc), Motivation, & Addiction
(Mesolimbic DA System)
Olds & Milner (1954): rats allowed to self-stimulate their brain
medial forebrain bundle (MFB) → was a area they compulsively stimulated (hundreds of time/hr)
this bundle connects ventral tegmental area (VTA) to the →
nucleus accumbens (NAc): contains high # of DA receptors, this turned out to be the key brain area for this effects
“Reward”: pleasurable sensations or effects experienced from a substance or activity (e.g., food, sex, psychoactive drugs)
but NAc is NOT a “pleasure center” in the center
NAc is a motivation/seeking system
DA Levels in Response to Activities
50 n/dl = normal day
40 n/dl = worst day
100 n/dl = best day
94 n/dl = favorite food
92 n/dl = sex
Drugs & DA =>
100-300 n/dl = alcohol, THC, heroin
1,100 n/dl = metamphetamine
Dr. H. Research into Evo. of NAc
NAc: evolutionary old structure, some form of it present in all vertebrates (e.g., birds)
Mesolimbic Dopamine Systems in Addiction
“Reward Pathway”: brain systems underlying motivation to seek, & getting pleasurable sensations form, or activities or substances (e.g., sex, food, drugs)
two hypothesized phases of motivated behavior:
“Wanting” or Intcentive-Salience: stimuli that focus attention & trigger seeking behavior
“Liking or Hedonic Value: pleasurable sensations, satisfaction, euphoria
incentive → something to get you to do something
salience → something that stands out to get you to pay attention
hedonic → pleasurable
“Wanting” & “Liking” in the Addiction Process
Initial drug intake
experienced pleasure
repeated drug consumption
reduced pleasure (tolerance)
increased drug intake to acheive previous levels of “liking”
incentive sensitization of “wanting” circuits for drugs & their cues
Compulsive drug taking
abstinence/withdrawal
drug-associated cues act as potent trigger of craving & relapse
relapse
wanting (DA) ↔ liking (opiates, cannabinoids)
pharmacodynamics tolerance: role in withdrawal & tolerance
neurons dynamically respond to drug-induced… over-active synapses by desensitizing or down-regulating
or
under-active synapses by sensitizing or up-regulating “Hangover” symptoms & withdrawal are the brain trying to rebound back to homeostasis
Drug Craving, Cortical Glutamate & Relapse
craving = “learned wanting”
Prefrontal cortex, esp. Orbito Cortex (OFC): area in addicts becomes hypo-sensitive (less) to natural rewards, but hyper-sensitive (more) to drug-related cues
drug craving: drug experience memories & learned “triggers” lead to preoccupation w/ drug taking
driving cravings is OFC release of Glu, stimulating AMPA & mGluR receptors located on mesolimbic neurons (VTA & NAc)
Intoxication, Withdrawal, & Craving in the Brain
wanting (incentive-salience) → mesolimbic system; release of DA
liking (hedonic value) → mesolimbic system; release of endogenous opiods & cannabinoids
withdrawal → amygdala; dysphoria, anxiety; release of dynorphin [makes you feel unpleasant] & CRF (Corticotrophin-releasing factor - stress inducing substance)
craving (preoccupation, relapse): OFC & hippocampus; release of glutamate (stimulate Mesolimbic system)
is addiction a brain disease? label matter
“the message that addiction is a disease makes substance user less likely to seek help”
taking about addition as a disease => decrease self-efficacy
Prefrontal Cortex (PFC) & Addiction Risk
“at risk” PFC → genetic predisposition, prenatal drug exposure, early-life stress (ACEs - adverse childhood experience, neglect)
variables that promote relapse
in rat models of addiction, these factors lead to relapse (cocaine-seeking)
during cocaine = elevated reposne
during extinction = low or no response
during cocaine reinstatement = back to cocaine self-admistration response
increase chance of relapse:
cocaine-related cues
small dose IV cocaine
mild stressor (brief shock)
^^^ ex: cocaine or cue-induced reinstatement
agonists & antagonists drugs as treatment for SUD
substitution treatment (agnoist - ex: methodone)
act similarly to opitates
stimulate opiate reception
alleviate or stop cravings for opiates
do not produce a rush (except for morphine or heroin)
can produce or maintain physical dependence (eventually wean them off)
blocking or aversion treatment (antagonists)
block the action of opiates
block opiate reaction
do not produce a rush
do not produce physical dependence
pharmacologic approaches to drug use
drugs for detoxification
rescue from overdose and/or reduce withdrawal symptoms
e.g., benzodiazepines for alcohol detoxification (i.e., reduce risk of seizures)
agonist substitution
activate same drug pathways but less intensely, goal to “wean off” drugs
e.g., methadone for heroin
partial agonist substitution
similarly conceptually to using full agonist
e.g., varencline (Chantix) for nicotine
antagonists
block effects of abused drug, but may produce withdrawal, or unpredictable overdose in relapse
e.g., naltrexone for opioid or methamphetamine
treating addictions: naltrexone + buproprion for Meth Use Disorder
randomly drug test them
~5% of placebo participants had negative urine samples
~30% of naltrexone-bupropion had negative urine samples
pharm approaches to drug abuse
anti-craving approaches
GABA agonists, glutamate antagonists: potential for reducing reinforcement & cravings, relapse
e.g., topiramate (Topamax) off-label: alcohol, cocaine abuse
(originally anti-seizure medication)
“new directions in treatment”
vaccines: create drug-specific antibodies to “immunize” a person against relapse, prevent drug from crossing BBB
Psychedelic-Assisted Psychotherapy (e.g., psilocybin, ayahuasca) may potentially be helpful, but research is mixed on long-term benefits
GLP-1 → may also potentially help treat drug addiction
Treating Addictions: Topiramate for Cocaine Use Disorder
Placebo group → don’t change much from baseline
topiramate group → ~60% to ~75% → increase in recovery