1/31
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
carrying capactiy
the maximum sustainable population for a species in a particular habitat
types of strategists
K and r strategists
K-strategists
organisms are more sensitive to abiotic factors and their populations increase slowly
What is the population size of K-strategists mostly determined by?
the carrying capacity (K)
r-strategists
organisms less sensitive to limiting factors and their population increases rapidly
What is the population size of r-strategists determined by
rate of reproduction (r)
Characteristics of K-strategists (8)
slow reproduction
slow development
late maturity
extended parental care
longer life
larger
secondary or tertiary colonisers
stable/favourable environments
Characteristics of r-strategists (8)
fast reproduction
fast development
early maturity
little/no parental care
shorter life spans
smaller
pioneer species
hostile/changeable environments
conservation
active and dynamic interventions by humans to maintain or improve biodiversity
preservation
attempting to keep habitats as they are, preventing change and eliminating human activit
reasons to conserve or preserve
economic
pollarding
preserves wood stocks and prevents grazing
coppicing
tree is cut close to ground level increases shoot growth at the base increasing yields
benefits of coppicing (4)
rapid new stem growth
varied light levels
variety of habitats
prevents soil erosion
Small scale timber management techniques (2)
coppicing
pollarding
Large scale timer management technique
FSC guidelines
Aims of the FSC guidelines
end clear felling
re-forestation
ecological functionality
benefit local
MSC
marine stewardship council
What are the MSC’s three principles
sustainability (fish maintain carrying capacity)
ecosystem impacts (not damage habitats)
good management (legal restrictions and adapting to change)
Legal restrictions for fishing made by the MSC (6)
annual quotas
mesh sizes
restrict certain species
boat sizes
sailing duration
monitoring & inspections
criticisms of MSC (4)
fishing zones too large to monitor so not enforced
monitoring expensive
false reporting of catch size
fish die when thrown back if over quota
Problems with aquaculture
higher risks of parasites, ugly, pollutes waterways
problems with consuming krill
passes problem to another trophic level and changes to eating habits are slow as people are resistant
Examples of how ecosystems can be managed to balance the conflict between conservation/preservation and human needs (3)
Masai Mara region of Kenya
Terai region of Nepal/India
peat bogs
wildlife conservancies
collaborations between many land owners around the Masai Mara and tourism companies where land owners receive incomes to promote conservation, de-fence
Human-wildlife conflicts in the Terai region of Nepal (6)
humans attacked by wildlife
cattle killed by wildlife
crop raids by wildlife
chemical fertiliser use
forest wood used as fuel
poverty driving poaching
How has local conservation in the Terai region of Nepal and India happened? (6)
local communities permitted to exploit forest whilst looking after it
seek to reduce human-wildlife conflicts
solar powered electric fences
wildlife migration corridors
anti-poaching patrols
biogas plants
How have they conserved the Masai Mara in Kenya? (3)
local population lead anti-poaching efforts
conservancies set up where locals manage the land so it benefits domesticated and wild organisms
managing tourism
Peatbogs
wetlands that contain partially decomposed biomass due to anaerobic conditions that are sites of high biodiversity (mosses and birds)
What does drying peat bogs do?
releases carbon dioxide and increases risks of flooding and fires
What does draining peat bogs with ditches and afforestation do?
dries landscape for other uses
Examples of environmentally sensitive locations that require limits over human activities (4)
The