Antarctica Case Study - IGOs & NGOs

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/14

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

AQA A-Level Geography - Global systems and Governance

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

15 Terms

1
New cards

Whta is the Antarctic Treaty system?

  • Signed 1959 → bans military activity, nuclear testing and mineral mining

  • 12 countries origionally signed up - now any UN member can (52 so far)

2
New cards

What are the advantages of the ATS?

  • encourages scientific cooperation - all research must be shared internationally

  • Protects the environment - Madrid protocol added strong environmental safeguards

3
New cards

What are the disadvantages of the ATS?

  • Bans on resource exploitation - limits economic opportunities

  • Tourism/human impact increasing - risks such as pollution & wildlife disturbance

4
New cards

What is the Madrid Protocol?

  • 45 nations signed it in 1991

  • It agrees to:

    • A ban on mineral resource activity

    • Exploraion of the continental shelf

    • Ban on introducing non-native species

    • Waste management rules

5
New cards

What are the advantages of the Madrid Protocol?

  • 45 nations signed it: big reach & influential/lots of countries following it

  • Actual difference made

6
New cards

What are the disadvantages of the Madrid Protocol?

  • No legal consequence for breaking it - done by trust - may not be effective

  • Antarctica is massive - hard to keep track of all activity

7
New cards

What are the impacts of the UN/UNEP to the governance of antarctica?

  • Any UN member can sign the AT - doesn’t manage it but recognises the importance

  • UN bodies such as the UNEP provide expertise and guidance

  • Works with the scientific committee on antarctic research (SCAR) to provide scientific assessments relevant to Antarctica

8
New cards

What is the CCAMLR?

  • Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources

  • 1982

  • The convention applies to all marine living resources which form part of the Antarctic marine ecosystem

9
New cards

What is the IWC?

  • Set up under the international convention for the regulation of whaling in 1946

  • Its roles include:

    • Setting catch limits & hunting restrictions

    • Working with scientific committee to study and research whaling

    • coordinating conservation work

    • Providing funds for conservation and research

10
New cards

What are the criticisms of the IWC?

  • No penalties for countries who decide to leave e.g. Japan 2018

  • Some countries don’t abide by the rules - e.g. Norway & Iceland still comercially take whales

  • Countries can exploit loopholes → Japan used the reason ‘scientific research’ to commercially whale

11
New cards

What is the Whaling Moratorium?

Introduced 1982 → banned all comercial whaling on all species and populations

12
New cards

What is ASOC?

  • Founded 1978 → Coalition of over 30 NGOs

  • Is the only NGO dedicated full time to protecting antarctica and the southern ocean

  • Key Work: established Marine Protocol Areas (MPAs) in regions like the ross sea

  • Highlights threats from fishing & climate change + promotes Antarctica as a vital climate research zone

13
New cards

What work does Greenpeace do in antarctica?

  • It isn’t part of the formal governance structure but have helped bring awareness

  • What they have done:

    • 1950s → built the World Park Base to draw attention to the continent’s fragility

    • Campaigned for the 1989 ban on mining in Antarctica

    • Advocates for continued enforcement of environmental protection under the Antarctic Treaty (1959) and the Protocol on Environmental Protection (1991)

14
New cards

What are the positives to NGOs combined power for Antarctica?

  • Stronger impact & power

  • Backed by science and research

  • More awareness e.g. joint campaigns

15
New cards

What are the negatives to NGOs combined power for Antarctica?

  • May lack enforcement power - can raise awareness - but unable to directly stop harmful activities themselves (require governments support to make meaningful changes)