Australian Legal System: Common Law, Statutes, and Court Hierarchies

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/34

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

35 Terms

1
New cards

Common law

The legal tradition on which the Australian legal system is based.

2
New cards

Statute law

Written law made by Parliament (House of Representatives and Senate).

3
New cards

Case law

Law established by previous court decisions (precedents).

4
New cards

Plaintiff

The party that initiates the case in litigation.

5
New cards

Defendant

The party that responds in litigation.

6
New cards

Crown/State

The party involved in criminal cases.

7
New cards

'R' in cases involving the Crown

'R' stands for 'Rex' or 'Regina' (Latin for King or Queen).

8
New cards

Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions

It prosecutes criminal matters on behalf of the state.

9
New cards

Solicitor

A legal professional who prepares cases and may appear in court.

10
New cards

Barrister

A specialist advocate who presents cases in court.

11
New cards

Court hierarchy in NSW

Local Court → District Court → Supreme Court.

12
New cards

Court hierarchy in the Federal system

Federal Circuit & Family Court → Federal Court → High Court of Australia.

13
New cards

Precedent

A legal decision that guides future similar cases.

14
New cards

Binding precedent

Precedents that must be followed by lower courts.

15
New cards

Persuasive precedent

Precedents that may be considered but are not mandatory.

16
New cards

Constitution's division of powers

It grants exclusive powers to the Commonwealth and leaves residual powers to the states; federal law prevails in conflict.

17
New cards

Doctrine of the separation of powers

It separates powers into Legislative, Executive, and Judicial to prevent concentration of power.

18
New cards

Elements in a negligence claim

Duty of care; Breach of duty; Damage caused by the breach.

19
New cards

Test for breach of duty in negligence

Would a reasonable person have foreseen the risk and taken steps to avoid it?

20
New cards

Proving causation in negligence

Damage must not have occurred 'but for' the breach and must not be too remote.

21
New cards

Key elements to form a valid contract

Agreement (Offer + Acceptance); Intention; Consideration.

22
New cards

Offer

A proposal that ends when revoked, rejected, or after a reasonable time.

23
New cards

Exceptions to communicated acceptance

Ongoing business relationships; unilateral contracts; postal rule.

24
New cards

Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.

The case that established that advertisements are invitations to treat.

25
New cards

Intention to create legal relations

Determined by social/domestic = no intent; commercial = presumed intent.

26
New cards

Consideration in contract law

The price paid for a promise—money, goods, services, or forbearance.

27
New cards

Insufficient consideration examples

Vague promise; past consideration (Roscorla); prior legal duty (Stilk); part payment of a debt (Foakes v Beer).

28
New cards

Chappell v Nestle

Confirms that consideration need not be adequate, but it must be sufficient.

29
New cards

Steps in answering legal problem questions

Identify issue; Identify rules; Apply rules to facts; Reach conclusion.

30
New cards

Contract law's importance

It provides predictability, enforceable rights, and the framework for business transactions.

31
New cards

Silence as acceptance in contracts

No, unless exceptions apply (Carlill, ongoing relations, postal rule).

32
New cards

Contract void or voidable

Mistake; misrepresentation; duress; undue influence; unconscionable dealing.

33
New cards

Unconscionable conduct

Taking unfair advantage of someone's special disadvantage (Commercial Bank of Australia v Amadio).

34
New cards

Proving unconscionable conduct

Plaintiff had a special disadvantage; it impaired their decision-making; defendant knew or should have known; defendant exploited the disadvantage.

35
New cards

Protecting against unconscionability claims

Ensure independent legal advice, full disclosure, fair and reasonable terms.