JMU COB 318 McCarthy - Test 4

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/122

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

123 Terms

1
New cards

administrative state

congress doesn't have the time or capacity to form all laws + they lack specialization and expertise; so, the USA is an ____ ____ that is made up entirely of unelected bureaucrats

2
New cards

delegation, rule making, enforcement, adjudication

4 steps of Administrative Procedure Act (APA); D, RM, E, A

3
New cards

delegation

congress passes laws that enable agencies to make rules

4
New cards

judicial review

did administrative body exceed its delegated authority?

5
New cards

arbitrary and capricious standard

is the administrative agency "acting like a God" and/or saying "I'm in charge so I can do this..."

6
New cards

fair notice rule

administrative agencies have to give broad public notice before enforcing rules

7
New cards

legislative review

congress takes back delegated authority via a bicameral veto

8
New cards

bicameral veto

if congress wants to "undelegate" a power, it must go through the bicameral system (House and Senate) and presentment (President); it is a purposefully slow process

9
New cards

rulemaking

administrative agencies make their own rules

10
New cards

impetus, notice, comment period, issue final rule

4 steps of administrative rulemaking; I, N, CP, IFR

11
New cards

impetus

congress, the administrative agency itself, and private parties (industry) can act as the force between rulemaking

12
New cards

notice

the publishing of the newly proposed rule; federal register has all proposed rule, with 99% of proposed rules being on the gov't agency's website

13
New cards

comment period

the reasonable period of public comment during rulemaking process

14
New cards

issue final rule

publish the new rule in code of federal regulations

15
New cards

enforcement

administrative agencies enforce their own rules

16
New cards

site inspections

administrative agencies can look at physical plant and records on site

17
New cards

subpoena

administrative agencies give order to testify and disclose records

18
New cards

search warrants

in some instances, administrative agencies can do warrantless searches (mainly issued by administrative law judge) for highly regulated industries

19
New cards

adjudication

administrative agencies can judge their own rules; done through administrative law judges (ALJs; are a part of the agency and take an oath to remain unbiased)

20
New cards

strong deference/Chevron deference

when a federal court yields to an agency's interpretation, so long as its "reasonable"

21
New cards

Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)

allows public to request info from administrative agencies

22
New cards

national security concerns, confidential information, sensitive commercial/financial information, criminal investigation concerns

exemptions to FOIA requests: NSC, CI, SC/FI, CIC

23
New cards

Government in the Sunshine Act

established that all administrative agency meetings are open to the public except rulemaking meetings

24
New cards

Regulatory Flexibility Act and Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act

excludes small businesses from regulations designed for big companies (RFA and SBREFA)

25
New cards

administrative/regulatory capture

blurring the lines between gov't and industry such that industry acts as the gov't to regulate itself; when the industry infiltrates a regulatory agency and implements its own rules

26
New cards

corporate law's race to the bottom

orchestrated by robber barons who used New Jersey to change corporate laws; NJ cancelled the laws, so other states started to adopt the code; Delaware "won the race"; 2 steps: enable legislation and fuel regulatory capture

27
New cards

enabling legislation

legislation that allows administrative agencies to regulate itself

28
New cards

fueling regulatory capture

made up of lobbying and the revolving door; keeps regulatory capture going

29
New cards

lobbying

first amendment right to petition the government

30
New cards

revolving door

when people work for both the government and an administrative agency; ogs were Richard Olney and Leland Stanford

31
New cards

Kefauver-Harris Amendments to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

enabling legislation in "new race to the bottom"; drug approval process must include clinical trials that prove it's safe and effective; includes clinical bias (no data oversight) and publication bias (ghostwriting)

32
New cards

FDA Modernization Act

enabling legislation in "new race to the bottom"; deals with direct to consumer advertising, detailing/off-label prescriptions, and guidelines (ex: healthy blood pressure changed in 2005)

33
New cards

nonprosecution and deferred prosecution agreements

enabling legislation in "new race to the bottom"; NPAs and DPAs that allow administrative agencies to avoid legal consequences by paying a large fine

34
New cards

6 billion

amount of $ donated to pharmaceutical lobbying

35
New cards

Scott Gottlieb

door revolver; FDA commissioner to Pfizer

36
New cards

Steve Hahn

door revolver; FDA commissioner to Chief Medical Officer of Moderna

37
New cards

Robert Califf

door revolver; Duke professor who conducted clinical trials to FDA commissioner to Google Health back to FDA commissioner

38
New cards

Alex Azar

door revolver; CEO of Eli Lilly to Secretary of Health and Human Services

39
New cards

Julie Gerberding

door revolver; CDC Director to Merck

40
New cards

Curtis Wright

door revolver; FDA to Purdue Pharmaceuticals

41
New cards

Merck's Vioxx

killed 60-500k; entered NPA, paid $1 bil fine

42
New cards

GlaxoSmithKline's Paxil

linked with thousands of adolescent suicides; entered NPA, $3 bil fine

43
New cards

Purdue's Oxycontin

200-500k addicted; entered NPA, paid $11 bil fine

44
New cards

agency

is there a principal (employer) - agent (employee) relationship?

45
New cards

agreement, ratification, estoppal/apparent authority, operation of law

formation of agency (A, R, E/AA, O of L)

46
New cards

agreement

95-97% of formations; sometimes expressed (definite terms; written or oral, equal dignity doctrine) or implied (oral or conduct)

47
New cards

ratification

agreement when employee just starts working for employer and after certain period of time it is determined that the employee works for the employer

48
New cards

estoppal/apparent authority

fairness; formation when employer creates appearance that employee works for them

49
New cards

operation of law

formation when disaster happens; anyone who responds to disaster works for the company

50
New cards

compensation, reimbursement, indemnification, cooperation

principal's duties in agency (C, R, I, C)

51
New cards

performance, notification, loyalty, obedience, accounting

agent's duties in agency (P, N, L, O, A_

52
New cards

independent contractor

principal cannot dictate and control the specific details of work; employee is not an agent, has no employer liability, and gets no benefits

53
New cards

control details, close supervision, similar tasks, special skill, duration, regularity of payment

independent contractor test:

- can employer c___ d____

- is there c___ s___

- is person engaging in s___ t___ that an agent would

- is s____ s____ required

- what is the d___ of the task

- what is the r_____ of p____

54
New cards

never liable, both liable

Principal-Agent Contract Liability

- disclosed principal/employer: agent is ______ _____ under the contract

- undisclosed/partially disclosed principal/employer: agent and principal are _____ ____ under the contract

55
New cards

scope of employment, respondent superior, vicarious liability

Principal-Agent Tort Liability

- was agent within the ______

- derives from r____ s____/v___ l____

56
New cards

authorize, time/place/manner, routine, reasonably anticipate, advancing, interests, solely, agent, tools

scope of employment test:

- did principal a___ the act

- what was t__/p__/m___ of act

- was act r___

- could principal r____ a___ the act

- was act a____ principal's i____

- was act done s___ in a____'s interests

- does principal supply t___

57
New cards

no

is there such thing as principal-agent criminal liability?

58
New cards

wages/hours, Family and Medical Leave Act, income security, health insurance

employee rights/benefits:

- w/h

- F&MLA

- i___ s___

- h___ i___

59
New cards

Fair Labor Standards Act, 7.25, overtime, hourly, child labor

wages/hours:

- governed by FLSA

- federal minimum wage: $___

- o____ pay for h___ employees

- c___ l___ laws

60
New cards

maternity, sick, 12, unpaid, Federal Employees Paid Leave Act, 12, paid

Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)

- m___ and s___ leave: __ weeks of ___ leave

- FEPLA: federal employees get ___ of ___ leave

61
New cards

Social Security Act, retirement, Federal Unemployment Tax Act, laid off, workers compensation

income security: SSA

- r___

- FUTA for l___ o___ workers

- w____ c____: state law (scope of employment)

62
New cards

Social Security Act, medicare, 65+, medicaid, poverty, Affordable Care Act, 50+

health insurance: SSA

- m___ (age ___) and m____ (people below the p___ line)

- ACA: companies with ___ employees must provide health insurance

63
New cards

Title VII

deals with discrimination in employment context, derives from Civil Rights Act

64
New cards

race, gender, sincerely held religious belief, age, 40, recognized disability, sexual orientation, transgender

protected classes: people allowed to sue under Title VII

- discrimination based on:

- r_

- g_

- s_ h_ r_ b_

- a_ (elderly, _+)

- r_ d_

- s_ o_

- t_

65
New cards

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, action decision, reinstatement/hired, wages, compensatory damages, punitive damages

EEOC; employment discrimination claims begin here

1. File claim

2. EEOC makes a__ d__ (almost never happens)

3. File lawsuit in federal court if EOCC takes no action

- remedies:

- r_/h_, lost w_, c_ d_, p_ d_

66
New cards

intentional discrimination

disparate treatment

1. prima facie case

2. employer offer valid explanation

3. protected individual proves pretext (proves employer lied in step 2)

67
New cards

prima facie case

show you're protected, qualified, rejected, and other party was non-protected

68
New cards

unintentional discrimination

disparate impact, i.e. tests/qualifications

69
New cards

religious descrimination

must be discrimination against a sincerely held religious belief

- exemptions: religious orgs/schools

- reasonable accommodations: Sabbath, dress code, prayer schedules, food/dietary

70
New cards

quid pro quo

type of sexual harassment; "this for that"; trading something for some sort of romantic behavior

71
New cards

hostile work environment

type of sexual harassment; multiple instances of unwanted romantic behavior

72
New cards

Title VII retaliation

being retaliated against because of sexual harassment

73
New cards

business necessity, bona fide occupational qualifications, seniority system, after acquired evidence of misconduct, lack of discriminatory motive

Title VII defenses:

- b__ n__

- b__ f__ o__ q__

- s_ s_

- a_ a_ e_ of m_

- l_ of d_ m_

74
New cards

Americans with Disabilities Act

ADA; company must have 15+ employees and apply reasonable accommodations unless they require undue hardship

75
New cards

disability

physical/mental impairment that substantially limits 1+ major life activities; ex: alcoholism, obesity, HIV status

76
New cards

affirmative action

preferential hiring/promotion of a protected class (usually race and gender)

- CA, TX, WA, FL, MI have banned affirmative action

77
New cards

labor unrest

led to labor law being created; derived from Haymarket and Homestead riots, Pullman strike, and Great Depression

78
New cards

concerted action

original unions and strikes; yellow dog contracts, pinkertons, labor injunctions, blacklist

79
New cards

National Labor Relations Act; unionization, discriminate, retaliate, good faith bargaining

NLRA; forbids unfair labor practices

- company can't stop u___, d___ against unionizers, r__ against unionizers

- company must engage in g___ f___ b___

80
New cards

National Labor Relations Board

NLRB; impasse occurs, union can go on strike; company can hire replacements and if they don't, they must rehire the strikers

81
New cards

Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act

LMRDA; deals with internal union disputes

82
New cards

grangers, populists, silver movement

their protest led to creation of Sherman Antitrust Act; G, P, SM

83
New cards

section 1

Sherman Antitrust Act; can't have a contract/combination in restraint of trade; deals with agreements in restraint of trade

84
New cards

Eugene V. Debs

Who led the Pullman Strike?

85
New cards

per se violation

section 1 violation with no analysis required

86
New cards

rule of reason violation; purpose, implement, competition, restrictive

section 1 violation with required analysis:

- look at p__, market ability to i___, effect on c___, availability of less r___ means

87
New cards

horizontal restraints

agreements among competitors

88
New cards

price fixing, group boycott, market allocation, trade associations

the 4 horizontal restraints:

1. PF

2. GB

3. MA

4. TA

89
New cards

trade associations

which horizontal restraint is a rule of reason violation? ex: Almond Alliance

90
New cards

vertical restraints

when 1 company integrates all aspects of its business and tries to do everything itself

91
New cards

territorial distribution, resale price maintenance

the 2 vertical restraints (both rule of reason analysis)

1. TD agreements

2. RPM agreements

92
New cards

section 2

Sherman Antitrust Act; no monopolies, attempts to monopolize, or monopolistic behavior

93
New cards

monopoly power

entity has a dominant market share in relevant market and engages in anti-competitive acts/exhibits anti-competitive intent

94
New cards

attempted monopoly

anti-competitive conduct, intent to exclude, and dangerous possibility of success

95
New cards

international monopoly

dominant market share, company transacts business in USA with substantial effect on US commerce

96
New cards

Clayton Act

restricted using the Sherman Antitrust Act against labor unions

97
New cards

Sections 2, 3, 8, and 7

what 4 sections are we concerned with in terms of the Clayton Act?

98
New cards

Clayton Act Section 2

deals with price discrimination (unless bulk purchase), matching offers, and market fluctuations

99
New cards

Clayton Act Section 3

deals with exclusionary practices

100
New cards

exclusive dealing, tying arrangement

2 types of exclusionary practices allowed under Section 3 of Clayton Act (ED, TA)